ISO 21502:2020 Clause 6.5.4 Initial project justification

Project Management 16 Minutes

The initial justification for the project should build on the rationale in the preliminary justification from the pre-project activities. This justification should be documented in a business case. The business case can be developed over a number of project phases as work progresses and should be updated to reflect significant changes in the project’s context and scope.
The business case should demonstrate the fit to the organization’s strategy, financial viability, commercial viability, and practicality of delivery within an acceptable level of risk. Alternative options for the approach to be taken and solution to be selected should be assessed and reasons for rejection given. If a project is part of a program, its business case can be included within the program’s business case.
NOTE While the document justifying the undertaking of a project is often referred to as a “business case”, the actual name used can vary from sector to sector or the method used.

The initial project justification, often referred to as the project justification or business case, is a crucial document that provides the rationale for undertaking a project. This document is typically created during the early stages of project initiation and serves as a foundation for decision-making, resource allocation, and project planning. The initial project justification is a dynamic document that evolves as more information becomes available and as the project progresses through different phases. It is a foundational document that guides project initiation, planning, and execution and ensures that the project is aligned with organizational goals and objectives. Here are key components typically included in the initial project justification:

  1. Executive Summary: A concise overview of the project justification, highlighting the key reasons for undertaking the project and its potential benefits.
  2. Project Objectives: Clearly defined and measurable project objectives that align with organizational goals. These objectives articulate what the project aims to achieve.
  3. Problem Statement or Opportunity Statement: A description of the problem the project addresses or the opportunity it seizes. This section helps stakeholders understand the need for the project.
  4. Market Analysis (if applicable): For projects with external impacts, a market analysis may be included to assess the demand, competition, and potential risks or opportunities in the market.
  5. Feasibility Study: An assessment of the project’s feasibility, considering factors such as technical feasibility, operational feasibility, economic feasibility, legal and regulatory compliance, and scheduling feasibility.
  6. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An evaluation of the expected costs associated with the project against the anticipated benefits. This analysis helps determine the financial viability and return on investment (ROI) of the project.
  7. Risk Analysis: Identification and analysis of potential risks that may impact the success of the project. This includes both internal and external factors that could affect project outcomes.
  8. Alternatives Considered: Discussion of alternative approaches or solutions that were considered before selecting the proposed project. This provides context for why the chosen project is the preferred option.
  9. Strategic Alignment: Explanation of how the project aligns with the overall strategic goals and objectives of the organization. This helps demonstrate the project’s importance in the broader organizational context.
  10. Resource Requirements: A preliminary assessment of the resources needed to complete the project, including financial resources, human resources, technology, and other assets.
  11. Timeline and Milestones: An initial project timeline outlining key milestones and deliverables. This provides a high-level overview of the project’s expected duration and major milestones.
  12. Dependencies and Constraints: Identification of dependencies on other projects or external factors, as well as any constraints that may impact the project’s execution.
  13. Recommendations and Conclusions: Summarizes the key findings and recommendations based on the analysis. This section provides a clear rationale for why the project should proceed.
  14. Approval Signatures: Sign-off from key stakeholders, indicating their agreement with the project justification. This may include signatures from project sponsors, executives, or other decision-makers.

The initial justification for the project should build on the rationale in the preliminary justification from the pre-project activities.

the initial project justification is a critical element in the project initiation phase and should be built on the foundation laid during the preliminary justification in pre-project activities. This justification serves as the basis for moving the project forward and gaining approval from key stakeholders, including project sponsors and decision-makers. The initial project justification serves as a crucial document to secure support and resources for the project. It provides a compelling case for why the project is necessary, viable, and aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives. Regularly revisiting and updating the justification throughout the project life cycle ensures that the project remains on track and continues to deliver value to the organization. Here are key considerations when building the initial project justification:

  1. Review Preliminary Justification: Start by revisiting the preliminary justification from the pre-project activities. This may include the identification of a business need, an opportunity, a problem to be addressed, or a strategic goal that the project aims to achieve.
  2. Refinement of Project Objectives: Clearly articulate the specific objectives and goals of the project. Define what the project is expected to accomplish and how it aligns with the overall strategic priorities of the organization.
  3. Alignment with Organizational Strategy: Highlight how the project aligns with the broader organizational strategy and goals. Emphasize the contribution the project makes to the overall success and objectives of the organization.
  4. Benefit Analysis: Conduct a thorough analysis of the expected benefits and outcomes of the project. Quantify and qualify the potential positive impacts the project will bring to the organization, such as increased revenue, cost savings, improved efficiency, or enhanced customer satisfaction.
  5. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Evaluate the anticipated costs associated with the project and compare them with the expected benefits. A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis helps in assessing the project’s financial viability and return on investment.
  6. Risk Assessment: Identify and assess potential risks and uncertainties associated with the project. Discuss how these risks will be managed and mitigated to minimize their impact on project success.
  7. Feasibility Study: Conduct a feasibility study to evaluate the technical, operational, and economic feasibility of the project. This includes assessing the availability of resources, technology, and expertise required for successful project implementation.
  8. Alternative Solutions: Explore and present alternative solutions or approaches to achieving the project objectives. Compare the pros and cons of each option and provide a rationale for selecting the proposed solution.
  9. Stakeholder Analysis: Identify and analyze key stakeholders who will be affected by or have an impact on the project. Consider their interests, expectations, and potential contributions to the project’s success.
  10. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the project aligns with legal and regulatory requirements. Clearly articulate how the project will comply with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards.
  11. Strategic Fit: Emphasize the strategic fit of the project within the organizational context. Highlight how the project aligns with the organization’s mission, vision, and long-term goals.
  12. Presentation of Findings: Compile the findings and justifications into a clear and concise document or presentation. Communicate the rationale for the project, its objectives, anticipated benefits, and the overall justification for proceeding.
  13. Approval and Authorization: Seek approval and authorization from relevant stakeholders, including project sponsors, senior management, or decision-making bodies. Ensure that they understand and endorse the initial project justification.

This justification should be documented in a business case.

Documenting the initial project justification in a business case is a best practice in project management. A business case serves as a comprehensive document that outlines the rationale, objectives, benefits, risks, and overall justification for initiating a project. It provides a structured and thorough analysis that helps decision-makers assess the feasibility and desirability of proceeding with the proposed project. Creating a well-structured and persuasive business case is crucial for securing the necessary support and resources to move the project forward. It serves as a reference document throughout the project life cycle, ensuring that all stakeholders are aligned with the project’s objectives and expected outcomes. Regular updates to the business case help in adapting to changes in project conditions and maintaining alignment with organizational goals. Here’s a breakdown of key components typically found in a business case:

  1. Executive Summary: A concise overview of the business case, summarizing key points for quick understanding. It includes the purpose of the project, key objectives, and expected benefits.
  2. Introduction: Provides background information on the business problem, opportunity, or need that the project aims to address. It may reference findings from the preliminary justification.
  3. Objectives and Goals: Clearly defines the specific objectives and goals the project intends to achieve. This section outlines the desired outcomes and the reasons for pursuing the project.
  4. Strategic Alignment: Demonstrates how the project aligns with the organization’s strategic priorities, mission, vision, and long-term goals. This helps emphasize the strategic significance of the project.
  5. Options Analysis: Evaluate alternative solutions or approaches to achieving the project objectives. This includes a comparison of different options, considering their advantages, disadvantages, and associated risks.
  6. Benefits and Value Proposition: Articulates the anticipated benefits and value the project will bring to the organization. Benefits may include increased revenue, cost savings, improved efficiency, enhanced customer satisfaction, or strategic advantages.
  7. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Quantifies the expected costs of the project and compares them to the anticipated benefits. A thorough cost-benefit analysis helps decision-makers assess the financial viability and return on investment.
  8. Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Identifies potential risks and uncertainties associated with the project. It outlines strategies and plans for mitigating and managing these risks to minimize their impact on project success.
  9. Feasibility Study: Assesses the technical, operational, and economic feasibility of the project. It considers factors such as resource availability, technology requirements, and the overall viability of the proposed solution.
  10. Stakeholder Analysis: Identifies key stakeholders and analyzes their interests, expectations, and potential impact on the project. This section helps in understanding and addressing stakeholder concerns.
  11. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Outlines how the project will comply with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards. Ensures that the project is conducted within legal and ethical boundaries.
  12. Implementation Plan: Provides a high-level overview of the project implementation plan, including major milestones, timelines, and resource requirements.
  13. Recommendation and Conclusion: Offers a clear recommendation on whether to proceed with the project. Summarizes the key findings and conclusions presented in the business case.
  14. Approval and Sign-off: Includes a section for stakeholders and decision-makers to officially approve and sign off on the business case. This signifies their endorsement of the project and its justification.

The business case can be developed over a number of project phases as work progresses and should be updated to reflect significant changes in the project’s context and scope.

the development of a business case is an iterative process that evolves throughout the project life cycle. It is not a one-time document but a living and dynamic tool that should be revisited and updated as the project progresses and new information becomes available. By treating the business case as a dynamic document that evolves with the project, organizations can adapt to changing circumstances and make informed decisions throughout the project life cycle. Regular updates help maintain the relevance and accuracy of the business case, ensuring that it continues to serve as a valuable tool for project governance and decision-making. Here are key considerations regarding the continuous development and updating of the business case:

  1. Progressive Elaboration: Develop the business case progressively as more information becomes available during different project phases. Initially, the business case may contain high-level information, and as the project advances, more detailed and refined data can be added.
  2. Early-Stage Business Case: In the early stages of the project, the business case might contain preliminary information based on the initial project justification. It sets the foundation for the project and provides a basis for seeking approval to move forward.
  3. Detailed Business Case: As the project progresses through planning phases, the business case can be enriched with more detailed information. This includes refined cost estimates, detailed risk assessments, and a more comprehensive analysis of benefits and alternatives.
  4. Scope Changes and Adjustments: The business case should be updated to reflect any significant changes in the project’s scope. This could include changes in project objectives, deliverables, or other elements that impact the project’s justification.
  5. Risk and Issue Management: Regularly review and update the business case in response to new risks or issues that may arise during the project. This ensures that decision-makers are informed about potential impacts on the project’s success.
  6. Benefits Realization: Track and update the business case as the project progresses toward completion. Provide evidence of benefits realization and validate the accuracy of the anticipated benefits outlined in the initial business case.
  7. Adapting to Stakeholder Needs: Consider feedback from stakeholders and incorporate their input into the business case. As stakeholder expectations evolve, the business case should remain aligned with their needs and priorities.
  8. Decision Points and Gate Reviews: Use decision points and gate reviews as opportunities to review and update the business case. These checkpoints allow project stakeholders to assess the project’s progress and determine whether it remains viable and aligned with organizational goals.
  9. Financial Updates: Regularly review and update financial information in the business case, including cost estimates, budget allocations, and financial forecasts. This is particularly important in dynamic projects where financial considerations may change.
  10. Governance Approval: Seek governance or steering committee approval for major updates to the business case, especially when there are substantial changes in project context, scope, or key assumptions.
  11. Communication Tool: Use the business case as a communication tool to keep all stakeholders informed about the project’s justification, progress, and any changes. Transparent communication helps build trust and ensures alignment among stakeholders.
  12. Lessons Learned: Capture lessons learned from project experiences and incorporate them into the business case. This continuous improvement ensures that future projects can benefit from insights gained during the current project.

The business case should demonstrate the fit to the organization’s strategy, financial viability, commercial viability, and practicality of delivery within an acceptable level of risk.

A well-developed business case provides a comprehensive and persuasive argument for the initiation and ongoing support of a project. It helps stakeholders make informed decisions, understand the potential benefits and risks, and ensures that the project remains aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives throughout its lifecycle.. Let’s delve into each aspect:

  1. Fit to Organization’s Strategy: The business case should clearly articulate how the project aligns with the organization’s overarching strategy, mission, vision, and long-term goals. Demonstrating strategic fit ensures that the project is in line with the organization’s strategic priorities and contributes to its overall success. This alignment is crucial for gaining support from key stakeholders and decision-makers.
  2. Financial Viability: An essential aspect of the business case is the financial analysis, which includes a thorough assessment of costs and benefits. The financial viability section should outline the expected costs associated with the project, including initial investments and ongoing operational costs. Simultaneously, it should highlight the anticipated benefits, such as increased revenue, cost savings, or improved efficiency. A robust cost-benefit analysis helps in determining the financial feasibility of the project.
  3. Commercial Viability: Commercial viability considers the market dynamics, customer demand, and the potential for the project to generate revenue or contribute to the organization’s business model. It involves assessing market conditions, competition, and the project’s unique value proposition. This analysis is particularly relevant for projects with external-facing outcomes, such as product development or market expansion.
  4. Practicality of Delivery: The business case should address the practical aspects of delivering the project, considering factors such as available resources, technology requirements, and project complexity. This section outlines the project implementation plan, including key milestones, timelines, and resource needs. It ensures that the project is feasible and can be realistically executed within the organization’s capabilities.
  5. Acceptable Level of Risk: Acknowledging and managing risk is a critical element of the business case. The document should provide a comprehensive risk assessment, identifying potential challenges and uncertainties that could impact project success. Additionally, the business case should outline risk mitigation strategies and plans for addressing unforeseen issues. Demonstrating an understanding of risk and its management contributes to the project’s overall resilience and success.
  6. Continuous Updating: As the project progresses through different phases, the business case should be a dynamic document that evolves with the project. Regular updates are essential, especially when there are significant changes in the project’s context, scope, or external factors. This ensures that the business case remains relevant, accurate, and aligned with the evolving needs of the organization and the project itself.

Alternative options for the approach to be taken and solution to be selected should be assessed and reasons for rejection given.

The assessment of alternative options and providing reasons for the rejection of certain options is a crucial aspect of a thorough decision-making process in project management. This process is typically part of the options analysis within a business case or feasibility study. Here’s how you can approach this:

  1. Identification of Alternative Options: Begin by identifying various alternative approaches or solutions to address the business problem, opportunity, or need that the project aims to resolve. These alternatives could include different technologies, methodologies, vendors, or strategies.
  2. Criteria for Evaluation: Establish clear criteria against which each alternative will be evaluated. These criteria should align with the project objectives, organizational goals, and other relevant factors. Common criteria include cost, time, feasibility, risk, and alignment with strategic objectives.
  3. Evaluation of Alternatives: Assess each alternative against the established criteria. This evaluation should be thorough and consider both quantitative and qualitative factors. It may involve cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, technical feasibility, and alignment with organizational strategy.
  4. Reasons for Rejection: Clearly articulate the reasons for rejecting specific alternatives. This is a critical step in the decision-making process, as it provides transparency and helps stakeholders understand why certain options were deemed less favorable. Reasons for rejection may include cost considerations, technical limitations, high risk, or lack of alignment with strategic goals.
  5. Documentation of Findings: Document the findings of the assessment, including the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative. This documentation serves as a valuable reference for stakeholders and decision-makers, providing a basis for the final decision.
  6. Comparative Analysis: Present a comparative analysis of the remaining viable options. Highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each, emphasizing how the selected option outperforms the rejected alternatives in meeting project objectives.
  7. Stakeholder Involvement: Involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. Their input can provide valuable perspectives and insights, ensuring that the decision-making process is well-informed and aligned with the needs of the organization.
  8. Risk Assessment: Consider the potential risks associated with each alternative and factor them into the decision-making process. This helps in understanding the potential challenges and uncertainties that may arise during project implementation.
  9. Final Decision and Justification: Based on the assessment, make a final decision on the approach or solution to be adopted. Justify the decision by clearly articulating how the selected option aligns with the project’s objectives, provides the best value, and minimizes potential risks.
  10. Regular Review and Updates: Recognize that the project landscape may change over time. Regularly review and update the assessment, especially when new information becomes available or the project context evolves.

By following these steps, you ensure a systematic and transparent process for evaluating alternative options, making informed decisions, and providing stakeholders with a clear understanding of the rationale behind the chosen approach. This approach enhances the likelihood of project success and aligns with the principles of effective project management.

If a project is part of a program, its business case can be included within the program’s business case.

This is an important considerations in project management, particularly when it comes to assessing alternative options and understanding the relationship between individual project business cases and a program’s business case. Let’s break down these concepts:

  1. Assessing Alternative Options:
    • It’s a best practice to thoroughly assess alternative options when defining the approach and selecting a solution for a project. This process involves considering different strategies, methodologies, technologies, or solutions that could potentially address the identified problem or opportunity. Each alternative should be evaluated against predefined criteria, such as feasibility, cost, benefits, risks, and alignment with organizational objectives.
    • Reasons for rejecting specific alternatives should be clearly documented in the business case. This documentation helps in providing transparency and justifying why the chosen approach or solution is the most suitable for achieving the project’s objectives. This information is crucial for stakeholders and decision-makers to understand the decision-making process.
  2. Inclusion of Project Business Case in a Program’s Business Case:
    • When a project is part of a larger program, it is common to include the individual project’s business case within the program’s overarching business case. The program’s business case provides a strategic view, outlining how the combined efforts of multiple projects will contribute to achieving the program’s objectives.
    • Benefits of including project business cases in the program’s business case include:
      • Holistic Perspective: It provides a comprehensive view of how each project contributes to the program’s overall goals and objectives.
      • Resource Allocation: Helps in effective resource allocation across multiple projects within the program.
      • Alignment: Ensures that individual project goals align with the broader program strategy.
    • This approach allows for better coordination, alignment, and governance across the projects within a program. It helps in managing dependencies, optimizing resource utilization, and ensuring that the overall program delivers the intended value to the organization.

In summary, a thorough assessment of alternative options and the clear documentation of reasons for rejecting certain alternatives are crucial for informed decision-making in project management. Additionally, integrating individual project business cases within a program’s business case provides a cohesive and strategic view of how multiple projects collectively contribute to the organization’s objectives.

While the document justifying the undertaking of a project is often referred to as a “business case”, the actual name used can vary from sector to sector or the method used.

While the term “business case” is widely used and recognized in project management, the actual name of the document can vary based on factors such as the industry, organizational preferences, or the specific methodology employed. Different sectors or methodologies may use unique terminology to describe the document that justifies the undertaking of a project. Here are a few examples:

  1. Project Proposal: In some sectors or organizations, especially those focused on non-profit or public sector initiatives, the document justifying a project might be referred to as a “project proposal.” This document outlines the purpose, scope, objectives, and expected outcomes of the project.
  2. Investment Proposal: In financial or investment-oriented contexts, the document may be called an “investment proposal.” This emphasizes the financial aspects of the project, including costs, expected returns, and the overall return on investment.
  3. Project Justification Document: Another term used in some contexts is “project justification document.” This term underscores the need to justify why the project is necessary and how it aligns with organizational goals.
  4. Feasibility Study: In cases where a detailed analysis of technical, operational, and economic feasibility is a primary focus, the document might be referred to as a “feasibility study.” This emphasizes the examination of whether the project is practically and economically viable.
  5. Strategic Case: In alignment with a strategic approach, the document might be named a “strategic case.” This highlights the connection between the project and the broader organizational strategy.
  6. Project Brief: Some methodologies, such as PRINCE2, use the term “project brief” to describe a document that provides a summary of the project’s justification, objectives, and scope.
  7. Business Justification: In methodologies like PRINCE2, the term “business justification” is used interchangeably with “business case.” It emphasizes the need to provide a solid business rationale for undertaking the project.
  8. Project Initiation Document (PID): In PRINCE2 methodology, the document that includes the business case is often called the Project Initiation Document (PID). The PID encompasses various aspects of project initiation, including the business justification.

The key is to understand the purpose and content of the document, regardless of its specific name. It should clearly communicate why the project is being undertaken, what it aims to achieve, and how it aligns with organizational goals. Standardizing terminology within an organization or industry can help improve clarity and consistency in communication.

Published by Pretesh Biswas

Pretesh Biswas has wealth of qualifications and experience in providing results-oriented solutions for your system development, training or auditing needs. He has helped dozens of organizations in implementing effective management systems to a number of standards. He provide a unique blend of specialized knowledge, experience, tools and interactive skills to help you develop systems that not only get certified, but also contribute to the bottom line. He has taught literally hundreds of students over the past 5 years. He has experience in training at hundreds of organizations in several industry sectors. His training is unique in that which can be customized as to your management system and activities and deliver them at your facility. This greatly accelerates the learning curve and application of the knowledge acquired. He is now ex-Certification body lead auditor now working as consultancy auditor. He has performed hundreds of audits in several industry sectors. As consultancy auditor, he not just report findings, but provide value-added service in recommending appropriate solutions. Experience Consultancy: He has helped over 100 clients in a wide variety of industries achieve ISO 9001,14001,27001,20000, OHSAS 18001 and TS 16949 certification. Industries include automotive, metal stamping and screw machine, fabrication, machining, assembly, Forging electrostatic and chrome plating, heat-treating, coatings, glass, plastic and rubber products, electrical and electronic equipment, assemblies & components, batteries, computer hardware and software, printing, placement and Security help, warehousing and distribution, repair facilities, consumer credit counseling agencies, banks, call centers, etc. Training: He has delivered public and on-site quality management training to over 1000 students. Courses include ISO/TS -RAB approved Lead Auditor, Internal Auditing, Implementation, Documentation, as well as customized ISO/TS courses, PPAP, FMEA, APQP and Control Plans. Auditing: He has conducted over 100 third party registration and surveillance audits and dozens of gap, internal and pre-assessment audits to ISO/QS/TS Standards, in the manufacturing and service sectors. Other services: He has provided business planning, restructuring, asset management, systems and process streamlining services to a variety of manufacturing and service clients such as printing, plastics, automotive, transportation and custom brokerage, warehousing and distribution, electrical and electronics, trading, equipment leasing, etc. Education & professional certification: Pretesh Biswas has held IRCA certified Lead Auditor for ISO 9001,14001 and 27001. He holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Mechanical Engineering and is a MBA in Systems and Marketing. Prior to becoming a business consultant 6 years ago, he has worked in several portfolios such as Marketing, operations, production, Quality and customer care. He is also certified in Six Sigma Black belt .

Published

Leave a Reply