The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Handling, Storage, Preservation and Issue of Material in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process of Handling, Storage, Preservation and Issue of Material .
2.0 Turtle diagram of of Process of Handling, Storage, Preservation and Issue of Material .
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Validation of Process in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process of Validation of Process.
2.0 Turtle Diagram of of Process of Validation of Process.
3.0 Annual Plan for Process Validation
Company Name
YEAR
S.No.
Process Name
Dept.
Planned vs. Actual
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
Oct-10
Nov-10
#####
Jan-11
Feb-11
Mar-11
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Approved BY :
4.0 MANUFACTURING PROCESS VALIDATION /REVALIDATION /CRITERIA
Validation/RevalidationCriteria
S.No.
ProcessName
Dept.Name
NameofInstrument(IfAny)
New Equipment in Use/ Major MaintenanceCarried outin theexisting Equipment
Modifications inTooling / MajorMaintenanceCarried out
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process for Measurement System Analysis (MSA) in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process for Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
2.0 Turtle Diagram of Process for Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
3.0 MSA PLAN
MSA PLAN
DATE ;
Sr. No.
Instrument
Dept.
Least Count
Range
Code
Schedule
Remarks
Apr-18
May-18
Jun-18
Jul-18
Aug-18
Sep-18
Oct-18
Nov-18
Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
Mar-19
Prepared by
Approved by
4.0 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS (MSA) PLAN / STUDY RESULTS
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of In-process and Final Inspection in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process for In-Process and Final Inspection
2.0 Turtle diagram of Process for In-Process and Final Inspection
3.0 Deviation Request Form:
DEPT. PROCESS/AREA : DATE: TIME: MACHINE : PART DESCRIPTION : PART NO: CUSTOMER: IR NO: DEV. QTY: LOT NO : MRN NO: MATERIAL: GRADE/FINISH :
NATUREOF DEVIATION
REASON
S.NO.
PARAMETER
SPECIFICATION
ACTUAL
REQUESTEDBY:
DETAILSOF ATLEAST 3 PREVIOUS LOTS
S.No
SuppliedQty
ActeptedQty.
RejQty.
Deviationif Any
CORRECTIVEACTIONSUGGESTED
ACTIONPLAN
RESP.
TG.DATE
SIGN
CORRECTION & DISPOSTION: ACCEPTED UNDER DEVIATION WITH /WITHOUT REPAIR: TO BE REWORKED /CHANGED: REGRADED FOR ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION: REJECTED OR SCRAPPED: TO BE SORTED NOW/ LATER STAGE:
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Incoming Inspection in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process for Incoming Inspection
2.0 Turtle Diagram of Process for Incoming Inspection
3.0 Supplier Quality Performance Rating
Month
Total Qty Received
UOM
Lot Qty Reject
Total Lot Received
Lot Direct Pass
Lot Reject
FTPR (% age
Line rejection
LRN (PPM)
Qty Accepted
Quality Rating (% age)
Prepared By
Approved by
4.0 Receiving Inspection Report
CompanyName
IR. No:MRNNo.:T.C No. :Lab:Date:
Lot No.
RECEIVINGINSPECTIONREPORT
ITEM NAME : SIZE/SPECIFICATION :SUPPLIERNAME : CODE :TOTAL QTY.: QTY CHECKED :REF. STD. NO : P.O. NO :
S.NO.
CHECK PARAMETER
REQD. SPEC. WITHTOLR.
OBSERVED RANGE
REMARKS
TOTAL NO. OF DEFECTIVES : LOT STATUS :ACC./REJ.NOTE: IF REJECTED THEN SEGREGATION (IN CASE OF EMERGENCY ONLY).
TOTAL QTY.
QTY. ACC.
QTY. REJ.
QTY ACC.(U/C)
CHECKED BY APPROVEDBY
5.0 Sampling plan
CompanyName
SR NO.
LOTSIZE
SAMPLESIZE
ACCEPTENCENO.
WITH GAUGE
WITHINSTRUMENT
1
2-9.
2
2
0-1
2
10-15.
2
2
0-1
3
16-25.
3
3
0-1
4
26-50.
5
5
0-1
5
51-90.
5
5
0-1
6
91-150.
8
5
1- 2.
7
151-280.
13
5
1- 2.
8
281-500.
20
5
1- 2.
9
501-1200.
32
5
2- 3.
10
1201-3200.
50
5
3-4.
11
>3200
50
5
4-5.
NOTE:-Samplingplan based on IS 2500 Part 1 2000GeneralInspectionLevel-1AcceptanceQualityLevel-2.5ApprovedBy
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Purchasing and Supplier Quality System Development in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process of Supplier Quality System Development
2.0 Turtle Diagram of Process of Supplier Quality System Development
3.0 Purchasing Policy
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this procedure is to lay down defined guidelines for Delegation of Purchase Order processing & procurement of materials by defining authority levels for P.O clearance for smooth running of production.
SCOPE:
This procedure is applicable to Procurement of all types of materials required to run Production smoothly.
RESPONSIBILITY:
HOD Purchasing is overall responsible for this procedure
KEY PROCESS INDICATORS (KPI’s)
Internal Customer Complaints ( Nos.)
Cost Savings ( Rs.)
Loss of production due to non availability of material ( Rs.)
Line Stoppages due to non- availability of material ( Nos.)
Physical v/s ERP Inventory variation ( %age)
Material Stock Ledger for Consumables & Raw Material
PROCESS FLOW
Procedure of Material procurement for various categories is as follows:
Raw Material & BOP’s: As per customer schedule, raw material planning is done by considering the Raw Material inventory, Defined Buffer Stock, WIP of every line and Finished Goods inventory. Accordingly, indents are raised by Purchase Department for approval as per Authority Level defined in Annexure – 1. After approval of indents, P.O. is generated by Purchase Department and sent to respective suppliers through fax, mail or by hand. Once the P.O is sent to the supplier, Purchase Department regularly follows up with the supplier to receive the material as per delivery schedule to ensure there are no line stoppages and defined buffer stock is maintained.
Job Work related to Production: As per the production requirements, the material is sent to the supplier through Excise Annexure. Subsequently, the Purchase Department regularly follows up with the supplier to receive the material as per delivery schedule. After completion of material as per the Annexure, the bill is raised by the supplier.
Job Work related to Tool Room / Maintenance:Requirement is generated by Tool Room & Maintenance departments for different types of Job Work such as Slot Cutting, Spline Cutting, Shaper, Temper, Wire Cut, EDM, Grinding, CNC Milling, Gear Cutting etc. After confirming the rates, Purchase department raises the indents for approval as per Annexure – 1 and after generation of PO, material is sent to supplier, and after completion of work, the material is received back from the supplier along with proper invoice. Rates for Temper, Wire Cut and EDM are fixed as per Qty/Hrs and for Slot Cutting and other operations, the purchase department takes the rates from different suppliers as per the job.
Packing Material: As per production planning, requirement of packing material is generated and after approval as per Annexure – 1, Purchase order is generated and sent to supplier. Subsequently, Purchase department follows up with the supplier to get the material on-time.
Consumables: There are two sub categories in this,
Items in Minimum Level
Requirement for items in Minimum Level are generated by Purchase department on daily basis to maintain the stock for the same. After approval of indents, PO is generated and sent to supplier to get the material.
Items required by different departments as and when reqd.
Respective departments fill a “Requirement Form” against their requirements and sends to the purchase department. Purchase department generate the indents after confirming the prices i.e. whether that item has been procured in the past or else, locates the suppliers and take quotations. After comparison and negotiation, Purchase department raises the Request for Rate Approval to higher authority. Once the rates are approved, indent and PO is generated
Capital Goods: For all thecapitalmachinery and other costlyequipments, prices are negotiated by Directors and/or G.M Operations. Purchase Department only generates the Draft PO’s as per finalized terms and sends them to respective suppliers after necessary approvals. Subsequently, Purchase department follows up with suppliers for getting the material on-time.
Purchase Order Amendment: P.O Amendment is raised in some cases due to following reasons:
Change in prices in Raw Material PO’s
Change in P.O. quantity in some PO’s
All Purchase Order Amendments are approved as per authority levels defined in ………………and after approval sent to supplier by purchase department.
4.0 Purchase Intent
ABCPvt.Ltd.
User ID.:
Print Date :
Page No.:
IndentNo
ItemName
Size
UM
Min.Level
Rep. Qty.
Stock
OrderQty
Req. Qty
Rate
Supplier
RequiredFor
Remarks
Approved By:-
5.0 Price Comparative Statement
Sub : Approval for purchase of required for indent No._
S.No.
Item
Qty/Unit
Party’s Name
Rate
Party’s Name
Rate
Party’s Name
Rate
Party’s Name
Rate
General Terms:- 1. F.O.R 2. Packing & Forwarding 3. Taxes 4. Delivery Period 5. Payment Terms 6. Discount 7. Validity of Quotation Kindly accord your approval to place our order on M/S General Terms:- 1. F.O.R 2. Packing & Forwarding 3. Taxes 4. Delivery Period 5. Payment Terms 6. Discount 7. Validity of Quotation Kindly accord your approval to place our order on M/S [Prepared by) [Approved By]
DOCUMENT No.
PREPARED BY
REVIEWED BY
APPROVED BY
DATE
PAGE
HOD Materials
MS
Director
1 OF 1
6.0 Material Requisition slip
From………………… No.To: store MATERIAL REQUISITION SLIP
Please issue the following material:
S.NO.
PARTICULARS
STOCK NO.
UOM
QUANTITY
REMARKS
Reqd.
To be filled by store department
Issued
Available
To be procured
(Shop Incharge) Issued by:
7.0 Purchase Order – Verbal
PURCHASEORDER – VERBAL
Date :
S.No.
ItemDescription
MaterialSpecification
Unit
Quantity
Rate/Unit
Supplier Name
Delivery Date
PreparedBy
ApprovedBy
8.0 List of ISO / Non ISO Certified Suppliers
S.NO
SUPPLIERNAME
ADDRESS
ISO
NONISO
PREPARED BY
APPORVED BY
9.0 YEARLY PLAN FOR SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT
S.NO.
SUPPLIERSNAME
MONTH(s)
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
March
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Approved Not Approved If not approved, attach reasons for the same
Management Representative
ImplementationDate:
PREPAREDBY:
APPROVEDBY:
SUPPLIERAUDITCHECKSHEET
ScoreEvaluation Criteria
“2” = Documented System & Full Compliance“1” =Documented System & Partial Compliance-(Actionplan required)“0” =No Documented System-(Actionplanrequired)“NA” = Not Applicable
Supplier:
AuditDate:
Auditor/s:
Auditee/s:
ReasonforAudit:
Sr#
Areaof Evaluation
KeyCheckpoints(Guidelinesto be referred)
Observations/Notes
Score
%
A
GeneralOrganisation& Management Structure
1
The Mangement Structure and resource allocation sufficient to support all necessary disciplines
Organization Chart with key positions filledResources appear adequate to fulfill all tasks
2
Responsibilities and authority are defined and evidence supports effective employee training
Job descriptions for all levels of the organizationEmployee training defined & implementedSkill matrix
3
Management defines quality and performance objectives that promote Continuous Improvement
Goals defined in the Business PlanGoals reflect continuous improvementMinutes of Management Review MeetingsEvidence of Cost of Poor Quality analysis
4
Workplace Health, Safety, Cleanliness, and Environmental Protection practices are in place and are consistently adhered to
Plant is clean, orderly and well lit5S disciplines are in placeAppropriate machine guarding and safeties are evidentNo signs of visible pollution or spills
System in place to define approved packaging for storage and preservation of product
Approved packaging plans Warehouse is clean & orderlyPackaging ensures protection of product
2
Product Realization Process provides clear linkages between Product and Process Design and Control Methods
Presence of PFD, PFMEA & Control Plans – Linkage between PFMEA, Control Plan and inspection/control methods
3
Organization is equipped to support necessary verification, validation and monitoring of characteristics
Presence of critical inspection equipment (i.e. CMM, laboratory equipment, etc.)Availability of 3rd party certified test facilitiesInspection/test records to validate testingResponses to out of specification conditions
The continuous conformance of purchased product is ensured
Requalification documents Incoming inspection recordsCorrective actions to non-conformancesThird-Party validation of material certificates
2
An adequate and effective Supplier Management Process is in place
– Supplier performance records Records of supplier response to non- conformancesSupplier Development of poor suppliersProcess to ensure use of customer approved suppliers, when appropriate
3
Process & System are regularly audited to ensure compliance and continuous improvement
Internal Audit recordsAudit schedule based on process requirements
-Gauge Identification ‘-Master List of Gauges & Instruments ‘-Calibration Certificates
6
Work Instructions are implemented for all employees affecting product quality, including repair and re-work operations
Evidence of Work Instructions posted on lineRe-Work Instructions are aveilable
7
Production planning and control
-Planning of production and interlink with customer requirements and sub suppliers schedules. Capacity V/s Actual UtilizationProduction Plan V/s AchievedDelivery performance is monitored
8
There is an effective Predictive & Preventive equipment maintenance system
‘-Preventive maintenance schedule & records, including downtime analysis Master List of MachinesVisual condition of equipmentNo leaks, excessive grease, etc.
Effective material identification and control is in place. Lack of visible bottlenecks or material constraints or tight and strict control of those. Material identified at all stages of operation
Suspect material identified and segragated in a secure and segregated areaProper storage of raw & finished materialsEvidence of FIFOSystem to monitor inventory levels and to drive stock size reduction
2
Material and lot traceability is implemented
Lot traceability records Receiving records with lot numbers recordedShipping records indicating lot numbersIn-process material with lot numbersShipped product can be traced back to received materialBar code labelling
3
System ensures preservation of Customer Tooling
Proper tool storage facilitiesTool maintenance records -Preventive maintenance schedule & records, including downtime analysis Master List of Tools
4
Plant capacity planning is up to date & Emergency strategies are available
-Current capacity studies and resource planning Evidence of contingency plansPotential bottlenecks identificationsafety stock identification
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Supplier Selection, Evaluation and Monitoring in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Process of Supplier Selection, Evaluation and Monitoring.
2.0 Turtle Diagram of Process of Supplier Selection, Evaluation and Monitoring.
3.0 Supplier Performance Rating
MONTH:
S.No
Supplier Name
Total Qty Supplied
Total Qty Received (QR)
Total Qty Accepted (QA)
Quality Rating QA/QRx100
Delivery Rating DR=Quantity Received in a specific time/Quantity Scheduled
Prepared By: Supplier Performance in % = (0.50QR+ 0.20 DR + 0.15 OR+ 0.15 QS )
4.0 Supplier Assessment Form
5.0 Supplier Registration form
Date:
Company Name:
Address:
Supplier No:
Phone:
1. Contact Person:
Cell #
Fax:
2. Contact Person:
Cell #
Email:
3. Contact Person:
Cell #
Note:Failure to send the enclosures (documents of proof) will be treated as non-compliance in that area. Type: Manufacturing Unit Trading Ownership:Proprietorship Private Limted Limited ForManufacturingUnits:CompetencyMatrixof the Workforce:
Total No of Employees
SSC (10th)
HSC (12th)
Diploma
Graduate
Post Graduate
Years of Experience
Education Base
Section
Up To 5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
> 25
Total
Manufacturing Capacity Total Production Capacity: Shifts/Day: Day / Night / Both Manufacturing Facilities Available: (Attach Separate Sheet, if reqd. )
Financial Strength Turnover of the Company (In Lacs): Are there any Expansion Plans: (Attach Separate Sheet, if reqd. )
Quality System
Do you have a Third Party Certified Quality Management System? Yes No If yes, which certification? ISO 9001:2015 IATF16949 : 2016 ISO14001:2015 (Please enclose a copy of your certificate)? If no, do you have plans for any of the Certifications ? Yes No (If yes, please enclose activity time-plan for Certification)
Customer Dependency (Indicate following data for top 5 customers)
CustomerName
Location
% Turnover
# of years associated with them
SUPPLIERREGISTRATIONFORM
Page 2 of 2
Environment & Safety The unit is registered under Factory Act? Yes No
If yes, Reg. #
List the applicable Legal Requirement/Standard/Code of Practices:
Number of Prosecutions, if any: No. of Reportable Accidents / Fatalities: Major Minor
Are you aware of all existing and impending legislation influencing your business with us. (Please Attach the list).
Under which category, does your Products/Processing Activities fall under the preview of Pollution Control Boards? Red Green
Please indicate your Source of Energy: Electricity/ Captive Generation / Both
Inspection & Testing Facilities
Give details of all Inspection & Testing Facilities available: ( Equipment name, year of mfg, LC, range, supplier, cal frequency, calibrated from etc )
EquipmentName
LeastCount
Range
Supplier
CalibrationFrequency
CalibrationFrom(Internal / External)
Company Rubber Stamp (Stamp below): Authorized Signatory: Designation: Date & Place:
6.0 List of Approved Supplier
S. No.
Name
Approved for Part No. / Description
Address
Contact Person
PhoneNo.
Mobile No.
Landline No.
PreparedBy
ApprovedBy
7.0 WORK INSTRUCTION FOR CALCULATING SUPPLIER RATING
1.0 PURPOSE:
To generate instructions for calculating supplier rating to improve the performance & to ensure Customer Satisfaction.
2.0 SCOPE:
Applicable to all raw material / job work suppliers.
QUALITY RATING (QR)-
QR=QA/QRX100
QA=Quantity Accepted
QR=Quantity Received
Qty accepted under deviation/ After Rework/ Rejected at Incoming
Stage shall be treated as Rejection.
DELIVERY RATING (DR)-
DR=QT/QSX100
QT=Quantity Received In Specific Time
QS=Quantity Scheduled
OTHER ISSUE RATING (OR)-
OR= (OR1+OR2+OR3+QR4) X20
OR1=Internal Line Disruption due To Supplier Fault
MARKS
None during Period 2
Once during Period 1
More than Once During Period 0
OR2=Customer disruption/Field/Customer return due to supplier Fault
MARKS
None during Period 1
Once or More during Period 0
OR3 =Premium Fright Rating
MARKS
None during Period 1
Once During Period 0
OR4 = Stock updation on weekly Basis by supplier end
MARKS
Stock update on weekly basis 1
Stock not update on weekly basis 0
QUALITY SYSTEM RATING (QS)-
The score achieved by the supplier during the Quality System audit would get the 0.15 weightage.
SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE IN %= (0.50QR+0.20DR+0.15OR+0.15QS)
CATEGORIZATION OF SUPPLIER–
SPR- ABOVE 90 – CATEGORY ‘’OUTSTANDING’’
SPR-> 80 < 90 – CATEGORY ‘’EXCELLENT’’
SPR-> 70 < 80 – CATEGORY ‘’GOOD’’
SPR-> 60 < 70 – CATEGORY ‘’SATISFACTORY’’
SPR- < 60 – CATEGORY ‘’UNSATISFACTORY’’
If Supplier Is categorized as ‘’Satisfactory’’ Inform to supplier to Improve and closely Monitor the Vendor Performance.
If Supplier Is Categorised as ‘’Unsatisfactory’’ Send Two Month Notice cum-Warning Letter
to supplier and monitor the supplies.
If after two months No Improvement are evident, Disqualify the same and delete from ‘’List of Approved Supplier’’
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Production Process in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach of Production process
2.0 Turtle Diagram of Production process
3.0 COMMUNICATION MATRIX
CompanyName
DEPT;
ASON DATE:
S.NO.
DESCRIPTIONOFCOMMUNIQUE
MODEOFCOMMUNICATION
RESPONSIBILITY
FREQUENCY
COMMUNICATIONRECD.FROM
COMMUNICATEDTO
4.0 Cost of Poor Quality
Detailsof Costs for calculating Cost of Poor Quality
Costof Raw Materials
Costof Press Strokes /Machining/ Welding
Costof BOP Parts
Sl.#
Description
Price
Description
CostperStroke
Description
Price
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Note:The above indicated costs are for Cost of Poor Quality Calculation purposes only. These are not actual costs.
ApprovedBy:
DAILY DATA COLLECTION SHEET FOR COST OF POOR QULAITY
DATE :-
Rejection Cost
Rework Cost
S. NO.
PART NAME
FailureProcessNAME
Raw MaterialCost Rs./Nos.
ProcessCost (Rs.)
Total Cost (Rs.)
Reject Qty ( No.)
Rejection
Rework
ReworkQty (No.)
Rework
Remarks
Cost OfPoor Quality (Rs)
ProcessCost (Rs)
Cost OfPoor Quality (Rs)
5.0 Engineering Change Request
PartName:
Date:
PartNumber/DrgNumber:
Deptt:Name;-
Requestto Dept.Name
S.No.
ExistingDimensions/Part
ChangesRequired
Reasonsof changes
RemarkIfany
REQUESTED BY
APPROVED BY
6.0 Daily Production Report
Date
Shift(A/B)
MachineNo
Operator
PartNo
Operation
Production
TimeLosses
Remarks
PlanQty
Ok Qty
Rework
Rejection
Man
Machine
Material
Method
Measurement
Short
Absent
leave
B/Down
Setting
Internal
External
TotalTrails
Fixture B/D
Samples
Decision
Prepared By : Approved By:
7.0 Disposal Note cum Rework Data
Deptt.:-
Period:-
S.No.
PartName
Prod
Rej Pcs.
PPM(Rej.)
Natureof Rej.
Root cause
ActionPlan
ReworkPcs.
PPM(Rew.)
NatureofRework.
Root cause
ActionPlan
Remarks
Prepared By
VerifyBy
Approved by (DGM)
Approved by ( Director )
8.0 Competence Matrix
DEPTT:
DOC.REF.
DEPTT/COMPETENCE MATRIX
DATE:
REVISION:
00:
Page : 1 of 1
Sr. No.
Level of Personnel
Educational Qualification
Experience Required
Skill Required (If any)
Remarks
9.0 Identification and Monitoring of Work Environment
PROCESS NAME :
NAME OF DEPT :
HEAD OF DEPT:
AS ON DATE: REVISION NO.:
Monitoring Details
Name
Date
Sign
S. No.
Environmental Parameters
Controlling Means(If any)
Resp.
Qty.
Goods Conditions
Remarks
Reqd.
Avail.
OK
Not OK
A.
TEMPERATURE
B.
LIGHTING
C.
NOISE
D.
HUMIDITY
E.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENTS
1.
MASK
2.
HELMATE
3.
APREN
4.
GLOVES
5.
GOGGLE
6.
SHOES
7.
EAR PLUG
8.
SHIELD
F.
HOUSE KEEPING
NOTE: IN CASE, ANY OF WORK ENVIRONMENT PARAMETER IS NOT SUITABLE TO MEET PERFORMNACE INDICATORS, MAKE ACTION PLANS WITH TARGET DATE AND RESPONSIBILITY
(HOD) (UNIT HEAD)
10.0 Identification and Motoring of Work Environment
PROCESS NAME :
NAME OF DEPT : DEPT. HEAD:
AS ON DATE: REVISION NO.:
Monitoring Details
Name
Date
Sign
S. No.
Environmental Parameters
Controlling Means(If any)
Resp.
Qty.
Goods Conditions
Remarks
Reqd.
Avail.
OK
Not OK
A.
TEMPERATURE
B.
LIGHTING
C.
NOISE
D.
HUMIDITY
E.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENTS
1.
MASK
2.
HELMATE
3.
APREN
4.
GLOVES
5.
GOGGLE
6.
SHOES
7.
EAR PLUG
8.
SHIELD
F.
HOUSE KEEPING
NOTE: IN CASE, ANY OF WORK ENVIRONMENT PARAMETER IS NOT SUITABLE TO MEET PERFORMNACE INDICATORS, MAKE ACTION PLANS WITH TARGET DATE AND RESPONSIBILITY
(HOD) (UNIT HEAD)
11.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN
Department :
As On Date: / /
S.No.
Stage
Type of Contingency
Action Required
Responsibility
Note : All contingencies like Utility Failures; Heavy Absenteeism, Key Machine Failures; Field Returns (Warranties); non-availability of raw materials / tools / consumables be considered.
(Signature)
12 Responsibility Matrix
DEPTT:
DOC.REF.
DEPTT/RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX
DATE:
`REVISION:
00:
Page : 1 of 1
S.NO.
Name of Person
Designation
Responsibility
13.0 WI FOR REJECTED MATERIAL DISPOSAL
Shop HOD to prepare weekly rejection & rework material disposal note and handover to quality HOD.
Quality HOD will examine all shop rejection & get it signed from DGM manufacturing and Director.
Same signed disposal note to be handed over to dedicated person at scrap yard. Ownership of quantity verification is with HOD quality.
The dedicated person will physically check the rejected quantity by counting as mentioned in disposal note and put in defined scrap area under lock and Key.
If any mismatch observed in quantity, informed to DGM manufacturing.
Only locked area rejection to be scrapped as parts/Assys. This is responsibility of security supervisor
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Plant Maintenance Process in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for layout Inspection in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.
1.0 Process Approach for layout Inspection Process
2.0 Turtle of for Layout Inspection
3.0 Layout Inspection Plan
LAYOUTINSPECTIONPLAN
Year:-
S.No.
Section
Component Name
Customer Name/Code
Planned vs. Actual
Months
Remarks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Prepared By:-Aproved By:-
4.0 Layout Inspection Report
LAYOUTINSPECTIONREPORT
S.NO. DATE:
PART NAME : SAMPLE QUANTITY: PART NO: LOT SIZE: SUPPLIER NAME : DATE OF INSPECTION:
S.NO
SPECIFIED DIM.
TOL
INSTRUMENT USED
OBSERVED DIMENSIONS
REMARKS
1
2
3
4
5
INSPECTED BY: APPROVED BY:
I’m excited to share the book I have authored:
Standard for Integrated Management System for Quality, Environment & Health & Safety
ISBN: 978-8199763272 Published by Brown Books Publications
This book provides a practical, risk-based framework to integrate Quality, Environmental, and Occupational Health & Safety systems into one streamlined management system — helping organizations eliminate duplication, improve efficiency, and drive continual improvement.