API Specification Q1 Tenth Edition 5.4.8 Design Changes

QMS for Oil and gas 10 Minutes

Design changes shall be identified. The changes shall be reviewed, verified, and validated, as appropriate, and approved before implementation. The review of design changes shall include evaluation of the effect of the changes on the product and their component parts in affected stages of product realization, as well as product already delivered. The review of design changes shall include an evaluation to determine if customer notification is required when design changes negatively affect the specified performance capability of the product. Design changes, including changes to design documents, shall be in accordance with the organization’s procedure. Records of design changes, reviews of those changes, and any necessary actions shall be maintained.

In API Q1, a design change refers to any modification, alteration, or revision made to the design of a product, system, or component after it has been approved. Here’s an overview of API Q1 requirements related to design changes:

  1. Definition of Design Change: API Q1 defines a design change as any alteration to a previously approved design, including changes to specifications, materials, dimensions, processes, or other design parameters.
  2. Evaluation of Design Changes: Before implementing a design change, organizations are required to evaluate the impact of the change on product quality, safety, reliability, and compliance with specifications, standards, and regulatory requirements.
  3. Approval of Design Changes: Design changes must be approved by competent individuals, other than those who developed the original design, to ensure objectivity and thoroughness in the evaluation process.
  4. Documentation of Design Changes: Organizations are required to maintain records of all design changes, including details of the change, rationale for the change, evaluation results, approval documentation, and any associated actions or follow-up activities.
  5. Communication of Design Changes: Any approved design changes must be communicated to relevant stakeholders, including production personnel, quality assurance personnel, suppliers, customers, and regulatory authorities, as applicable.
  6. Verification of Design Changes: After implementing a design change, organizations must verify the effectiveness of the change through testing, inspection, or other verification activities to ensure that the modified design meets specified requirements and functions as intended.
  7. Validation of Design Changes: In some cases, design changes may require validation to confirm that the modified design continues to satisfy customer needs, regulatory requirements, and other applicable standards.
  8. Control of Design Changes: Organizations are required to establish procedures for the control of design changes, including the identification, review, approval, implementation, and verification/validation of changes, as well as the management of associated documentation and records.

Overall, API Q1 emphasizes the importance of carefully managing and controlling design changes to ensure that they are evaluated, approved, implemented, and verified in a systematic and controlled manner, with appropriate consideration given to their potential impact on product quality, safety, reliability, and compliance.

Design changes shall be identified.

During the designing processes, organizations must identify any design changes that occur. This means that as the design process progresses, if any modifications, alterations, or revisions are made to the design of a product, system, or component, they must be recognized and documented. Identifying design changes is essential for ensuring that the design remains accurate, up-to-date, and compliant with specifications, standards, and regulatory requirements throughout the development process. Additionally, identifying design changes enables organizations to evaluate the impact of these changes on product quality, safety, reliability, and compliance, and to take appropriate actions, such as obtaining approval from competent individuals, implementing verification/validation activities, and updating relevant documentation. Overall, the identification of design changes is a critical aspect of design management in API Q1, contributing to the overall effectiveness and integrity of the design process.

The changes shall be reviewed, verified, and validated, as appropriate, and approved before implementation.

In accordance with API Q1 requirements, before implementing any design changes, organizations must ensure that they undergo thorough review, verification, and validation processes, as appropriate, and obtain approval from competent individuals. Here’s a breakdown of these steps:

  1. Review: Design changes should undergo a comprehensive review process involving relevant stakeholders, such as design engineers, project managers, quality assurance personnel, and other subject matter experts. During the review, the proposed changes are assessed for their feasibility, potential impact on product quality, safety, reliability, and compliance, as well as alignment with project objectives and requirements.
  2. Verification: Verification involves confirming that the design changes have been implemented correctly and accurately. This may include conducting inspections, tests, or analyses to ensure that the changes have been incorporated into the design documentation and that they meet specified requirements. Verification helps identify any discrepancies or errors in the implementation of the changes before they are approved for implementation.
  3. Validation: Validation is the process of confirming that the design changes achieve their intended purpose and are effective in addressing the identified need or problem. This may involve testing the modified design under simulated or real-world conditions to assess its performance, functionality, and compliance with requirements. Validation ensures that the design changes meet customer needs, regulatory requirements, and other applicable standards.
  4. Approval: Once the design changes have been reviewed, verified, and validated, they must be approved by competent individuals who are separate from those who proposed or developed the changes. Approval ensures that the changes have been properly assessed, evaluated, and deemed suitable for implementation. It also provides accountability and ensures that decisions regarding design changes are made objectively and in the best interest of the organization.

By following these steps, organizations can ensure that design changes are thoroughly evaluated, verified, and validated before they are implemented, minimizing the risk of introducing errors, defects, or non-conformities into the design. This systematic approach helps maintain the integrity and quality of the design process, ultimately leading to the delivery of products or systems that meet customer expectations and regulatory requirements.

The review of design changes shall include evaluation of the effect of the changes on the product and their component parts in affected stages of product realization, as well as product already delivered.

API Q1 emphasizes the importance of thoroughly reviewing design changes to assess their impact not only on the current stage of product realization but also on previously delivered products and their component parts. Here’s why this comprehensive evaluation is necessary:

  1. Product Integrity: Reviewing the effect of design changes on the product and its component parts ensures that the integrity of the entire product is maintained. It helps identify any potential interactions or dependencies between different components and ensures that changes do not compromise the functionality, reliability, or safety of the product.
  2. Supply Chain Management: Assessing the impact of design changes on component parts helps organizations manage their supply chain effectively. It ensures that suppliers are informed of any modifications that may affect the materials, specifications, or processes they provide, allowing them to adjust their processes accordingly and maintain consistency in product quality.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: Many industries, including the oil and gas sector, are subject to regulatory requirements that govern the design, manufacture, and delivery of products. Reviewing design changes helps ensure compliance with these regulations by identifying any changes that may impact product safety, environmental impact, or other regulatory considerations.
  4. Customer Satisfaction: Considering the effect of design changes on previously delivered products helps maintain customer satisfaction. It ensures that customers receive consistent and reliable products, even if changes are made to the design over time. Additionally, it allows organizations to proactively address any issues or concerns that may arise from changes to previously delivered products.
  5. Risk Management: Evaluating the effect of design changes on all stages of product realization helps organizations manage risks effectively. It allows them to identify potential risks associated with implementing the changes and develop mitigation strategies to minimize their impact on product quality, delivery schedules, and customer satisfaction.

By including an evaluation of the effect of design changes on the product and its component parts in affected stages of product realization, as well as previously delivered products, organizations can ensure that changes are thoroughly assessed and managed to maintain product integrity, regulatory compliance, and customer satisfaction. This proactive approach helps mitigate risks and ensures the continued success of the organization’s products and services.

The review of design changes shall include an evaluation to determine if customer notification is required when design changes negatively affect the specified performance capability of the product.

Ensuring that design changes are thoroughly reviewed to determine if customer notification is required is crucial, especially when changes may negatively affect the specified performance capability of the product. Here’s why this evaluation is necessary:

  1. Transparency and Trust: Customer notification demonstrates transparency and fosters trust between the organization and its customers. It allows customers to stay informed about changes that may impact the performance or functionality of the products they use, enabling them to make informed decisions and take appropriate actions.
  2. Customer Satisfaction: Promptly notifying customers of design changes that negatively affect product performance helps maintain customer satisfaction. It shows that the organization values its customers’ interests and is committed to providing high-quality products that meet their needs and expectations.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: In many industries, including oil and gas, there are regulatory requirements or industry standards that mandate customer notification when design changes impact product performance. By evaluating whether customer notification is required, organizations can ensure compliance with these regulations and standards.
  4. Risk Mitigation: Customer notification helps mitigate the risk of negative impacts resulting from design changes. By promptly informing customers of changes that may affect product performance, organizations can minimize the risk of product failures, safety hazards, or other adverse consequences that could lead to customer dissatisfaction or legal liabilities.
  5. Customer Feedback and Collaboration: Customer notification provides an opportunity for organizations to engage with customers, gather feedback, and collaborate on solutions. It allows customers to express concerns or preferences regarding the changes and provides valuable insights that can inform future design decisions and improvements.
  6. Brand Reputation: Effective customer notification practices contribute to a positive brand reputation. Organizations that prioritize transparency, communication, and customer satisfaction are more likely to build strong relationships with their customers and enhance their brand image in the marketplace.

By including an evaluation to determine if customer notification is required when design changes negatively affect the specified performance capability of the product, organizations can demonstrate their commitment to customer-centricity, regulatory compliance, risk management, and brand reputation. This proactive approach helps maintain customer trust, satisfaction, and loyalty, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of the organization.

Design changes, including changes to design documents, shall be in accordance with the organization’s procedure.

Adhering to the organization’s established procedures is crucial when implementing design changes, including modifications to design documents. Here’s why:

  1. Consistency: Following established procedures ensures consistency and uniformity in how design changes are managed and implemented across the organization. This consistency helps maintain the quality and integrity of the design process and ensures that all changes are handled in a systematic and controlled manner.
  2. Compliance: Organizational procedures are often developed in alignment with industry standards, regulatory requirements, and best practices. Adhering to these procedures helps ensure compliance with relevant regulations and standards governing the design and development of products.
  3. Risk Management: Procedures typically include steps for assessing the impact of design changes, evaluating risks, and implementing appropriate controls. By following these procedures, organizations can effectively manage the risks associated with design changes and minimize the likelihood of errors, defects, or non-conformities.
  4. Efficiency: Established procedures provide a structured framework for managing design changes, streamlining the change management process, and reducing the likelihood of delays or disruptions. This promotes efficiency and productivity in the design and development process.
  5. Documentation and Traceability: Procedures typically require documentation of design changes, including the rationale for the change, evaluation results, approval documentation, and any associated actions. This documentation ensures traceability and provides a clear audit trail of all changes made to the design.
  6. Accountability: By following established procedures, organizations can assign clear roles and responsibilities for managing design changes. This promotes accountability and ensures that individuals involved in the change management process understand their roles and obligations.
  7. Continuous Improvement: Procedures are often periodically reviewed and updated to incorporate lessons learned, feedback from stakeholders, and changes in regulatory requirements or industry standards. By following these procedures, organizations can contribute to continuous improvement in their design and development processes.

Overall, adhering to the organization’s procedures when implementing design changes is essential for maintaining consistency, ensuring compliance, managing risks, promoting efficiency, documenting changes, fostering accountability, and driving continuous improvement in the design and development process. This systematic approach helps organizations effectively manage change and deliver high-quality products that meet customer needs and regulatory requirements.

Records of design changes, reviews of those changes, and any necessary actions shall be maintained.

Maintaining records of design changes, reviews, and any necessary actions is critical for ensuring traceability, accountability, and compliance with API Q1 requirements. Here’s why these records are essential:

  1. Traceability: Records of design changes provide a clear audit trail of all modifications made to the design over time. This traceability allows organizations to track the evolution of the design, identify when and why changes were made, and understand the rationale behind each modification.
  2. Compliance: Maintaining records of design changes ensures compliance with API Q1 requirements, which mandate the documentation of all changes to design documents and associated reviews. These records serve as evidence of the organization’s adherence to regulatory standards and industry best practices.
  3. Quality Management: Records of design changes and reviews facilitate quality management by enabling organizations to monitor the effectiveness of their change management processes. By reviewing these records, organizations can identify trends, patterns, or recurring issues related to design changes and take corrective actions to improve their processes.
  4. Decision Making: Design change records provide valuable information for decision-making purposes. They allow stakeholders to assess the impact of proposed changes, evaluate the effectiveness of previous decisions, and make informed choices about future modifications to the design.
  5. Risk Management: Design change records help organizations manage risks associated with modifications to the design. By documenting the review process and any actions taken in response to identified issues or concerns, organizations can mitigate the potential negative impacts of design changes on product quality, safety, and compliance.
  6. Continual Improvement: Analyzing records of design changes and reviews can identify opportunities for continual improvement in the design process. By identifying areas where the process can be optimized or enhanced, organizations can drive efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance the overall quality of their products.

Overall, maintaining records of design changes, reviews, and any necessary actions is essential for effective design management, regulatory compliance, quality assurance, risk management, and continual improvement. These records provide transparency, accountability, and valuable insights that support the organization’s objectives and contribute to the delivery of high-quality products and services.

Change Record
Change Number: DC-001
Date of Change: May 1, 2024
Description of Change: Updated material specification for component X from stainless steel to carbon steel to reduce manufacturing costs.
Reason for Change: Cost reduction initiative to improve competitiveness in the market.
Impact Analysis:
– Reviewed potential impact on product performance, durability, and corrosion resistance.
– Conducted cost analysis to assess savings from material change.
Review and Approval:
– Reviewed by design engineering team, manufacturing department, and quality assurance.
– Approved by design manager and manufacturing director.
Actions Taken:
– Updated engineering drawings and specifications to reflect material change.
– Notified procurement department to update vendor contracts and sourcing agreements.
– Initiated requalification testing to ensure compliance with performance requirements.
Implementation Date: June 1, 2024
Follow-up Actions:
– Monitored manufacturing process to ensure proper implementation of material change.
– Conducted post-implementation review to evaluate effectiveness of cost savings and any unforeseen impacts on product quality or performance.

Published by Pretesh Biswas

Pretesh Biswas has wealth of qualifications and experience in providing results-oriented solutions for your system development, training or auditing needs. He has helped dozens of organizations in implementing effective management systems to a number of standards. He provide a unique blend of specialized knowledge, experience, tools and interactive skills to help you develop systems that not only get certified, but also contribute to the bottom line. He has taught literally hundreds of students over the past 5 years. He has experience in training at hundreds of organizations in several industry sectors. His training is unique in that which can be customized as to your management system and activities and deliver them at your facility. This greatly accelerates the learning curve and application of the knowledge acquired. He is now ex-Certification body lead auditor now working as consultancy auditor. He has performed hundreds of audits in several industry sectors. As consultancy auditor, he not just report findings, but provide value-added service in recommending appropriate solutions. Experience Consultancy: He has helped over 100 clients in a wide variety of industries achieve ISO 9001,14001,27001,20000, OHSAS 18001 and TS 16949 certification. Industries include automotive, metal stamping and screw machine, fabrication, machining, assembly, Forging electrostatic and chrome plating, heat-treating, coatings, glass, plastic and rubber products, electrical and electronic equipment, assemblies & components, batteries, computer hardware and software, printing, placement and Security help, warehousing and distribution, repair facilities, consumer credit counseling agencies, banks, call centers, etc. Training: He has delivered public and on-site quality management training to over 1000 students. Courses include ISO/TS -RAB approved Lead Auditor, Internal Auditing, Implementation, Documentation, as well as customized ISO/TS courses, PPAP, FMEA, APQP and Control Plans. Auditing: He has conducted over 100 third party registration and surveillance audits and dozens of gap, internal and pre-assessment audits to ISO/QS/TS Standards, in the manufacturing and service sectors. Other services: He has provided business planning, restructuring, asset management, systems and process streamlining services to a variety of manufacturing and service clients such as printing, plastics, automotive, transportation and custom brokerage, warehousing and distribution, electrical and electronics, trading, equipment leasing, etc. Education & professional certification: Pretesh Biswas has held IRCA certified Lead Auditor for ISO 9001,14001 and 27001. He holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Mechanical Engineering and is a MBA in Systems and Marketing. Prior to becoming a business consultant 6 years ago, he has worked in several portfolios such as Marketing, operations, production, Quality and customer care. He is also certified in Six Sigma Black belt .

Published

Leave a Reply