IATF 16949:2016 Clause Prioritization

Organisations are required to analyse and evaluate appropriate data and information arising from monitoring and measurement activities.The results of the analysis must be used to evaluate the following:

  1. The conformity to requirements of products and services provided,
  2. Customer satisfaction,
  3. The performance and effectiveness of the organisations management system,
  4. If planning activities have been implemented effectively,
  5. If actions taken to address risks and opportunities have been effective,
  6. The performance of external providers (EG: suppliers / subcontractors),
  7. The need for any improvements required to the management system,

It is also noted that methods used for the analyse of data could include statistical techniques.Data collection systems exist to provide data to the function/department responsible for analyzing and reporting issues related to the effectiveness of the Quality Management System and overall quality improvement. You should expect to see that the organization has developed a process (method, techniques, format, etc.) to identify, collect and analyze and evaluate data and information from both internal and external sources (i.e. quality records, monitoring and measuring results, process performance results, objectives, internal audit findings, customer surveys and feedback, 2nd or 3rd-party audit results, competitor and benchmarking information, product test results, complaints, supplier performance information, etc.).This ‘input’ (information and data) should reflect upon the adequacy, suitability and effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes. The ‘output’ (result of the analysis) must provide information (understanding, insight, awareness, confidence, knowledge of, etc.). The analysis output must provide insight to:

  1. Achievement of Quality objectives
  2. Customer satisfaction and perception;
  3. Product conformance;
  4. Process performance;
  5. Product and process characteristics;
  6. Trends in products and processes;
  7. Opportunities for preventive action;
  8. Suppliers and subcontractors.
  9. Need for corrective action;
  10. Opportunity for improvement;
  11. Competition. Prioritization

Trends in quality and operational performance shall be compared with progress toward objectives and lead to action to support prioritization of actions for improving customer satisfaction.

The analysis and evaluation of quality objectives are closely linked to improving customer satisfaction. When organizations effectively assess their quality objectives and align them with customer needs, they can drive continuous improvement initiatives that lead to enhanced customer satisfaction. During the process of defining quality objectives, organizations take into account customer requirements and expectations. This helps ensure that the objectives are aligned with what customers value most. Quality objectives are often associated with specific KPIs that measure different aspects of product or service quality. Regular monitoring and analysis of these KPIs provide insights into the organization’s performance and its impact on customer satisfaction. The analysis of quality objective data allows organizations to make data-driven decisions. They can identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement based on factual evidence rather than assumptions. If there are deviations from quality objectives or customer satisfaction metrics, root cause analysis helps identify underlying issues. Addressing root causes leads to more effective corrective actions and long-term improvements. The evaluation of quality objectives drives continuous improvement efforts. Organizations use the analysis results to prioritize improvement initiatives that directly impact customer satisfaction. Customer feedback, complaints, and suggestions are valuable inputs during the evaluation process. Integrating customer feedback into the analysis helps identify specific pain points and opportunities for better customer experience. Organizations compare their performance against industry benchmarks and best practices during the evaluation process. This allows them to identify areas where they can excel and learn from industry leaders to enhance customer satisfaction. Analyzing quality objectives through the lens of customer satisfaction encourages a customer-centric approach to quality management. It fosters a culture where meeting customer needs and expectations is the primary focus. The analysis and evaluation results are communicated across the organization. This helps align all employees with customer-centric goals and reinforces the importance of customer satisfaction. Quality objectives that are well-aligned with customer satisfaction goals contribute to overall business success. Higher customer satisfaction often leads to increased loyalty, repeat business, and positive word-of-mouth referrals. Leaders play a crucial role in the evaluation process by setting the tone for customer focus and driving improvement initiatives. Their involvement demonstrates the organization’s commitment to enhancing customer satisfaction. By conducting a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of quality objectives, organizations can identify opportunities for improvement and prioritize actions that directly impact customer satisfaction. A continuous focus on customer needs, data-driven decision-making, and a culture of improvement contribute to creating a positive customer experience and building lasting customer relationships.

The process of comparing trends in quality and operational performance with progress toward objectives is crucial for driving continuous improvement and enhancing customer satisfaction in any industry, including the automotive sector. By conducting this comparison, organizations can identify areas that require attention and prioritize actions to address potential gaps or opportunities for improvement. Here’s how this process works:

  1. Establishing Objectives: The organization sets specific and measurable objectives related to quality and operational performance. These objectives align with the organization’s overall goals and customer requirements.
  2. Monitoring Quality and Operational Performance: The organization regularly monitors key performance indicators (KPIs) related to quality and operational performance. These KPIs may include product defect rates, process capability, on-time delivery, customer complaints, lead times, and other relevant metrics.
  3. Data Analysis: Statistical tools and data analysis techniques are used to analyze the collected data and identify trends and patterns over time. This analysis helps in understanding performance trajectories and potential areas of concern.
  4. Comparing with Objectives: The trends observed in quality and operational performance are compared with the established objectives. This comparison helps assess whether the organization is making progress toward achieving its goals.
  5. Action Planning: Based on the comparison results, the organization identifies any gaps between actual performance and the desired objectives. Action plans are developed to address these gaps and improve performance in areas where targets are not being met.
  6. Prioritization of Actions: The organization prioritizes actions based on the significance of the gaps and the potential impact on customer satisfaction. Critical areas that directly affect customer experience are given priority.
  7. Continuous Improvement: The action plans are implemented as part of the organization’s continuous improvement initiatives. Teams work collaboratively to implement corrective actions and make the necessary improvements.
  8. Performance Review and Feedback: Regular reviews of performance data and progress toward objectives are conducted. The organization seeks feedback from customers to gauge their satisfaction and identify areas for further improvement.
  9. Customer-Centric Approach: The organization keeps customer needs and expectations at the forefront of its improvement efforts. Customer feedback is used to fine-tune processes and enhance customer experience.
  10. Adjustment of Objectives: As the organization progresses in its improvement journey, objectives may need to be adjusted or refined based on new insights and changing customer requirements.

By continually comparing quality and operational performance with objectives, organizations can identify early warning signs, address challenges, and proactively take corrective actions. This data-driven approach empowers organizations to improve customer satisfaction, deliver consistent quality products and services, and maintain a competitive advantage in the market.

Leave a Reply