Example of documentation template for Customer Satisfaction Measurement Process in IATF

The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Customer Satisfaction Measurement Process in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. ​​If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.

1.0 Process Approach for Customer Satisfaction Measurement Process

2.0 Turtle Diagram of Customer Satisfaction Measurement Process

3.0 CUSTOMER ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

    SR.NO  NAME OF THE CUSTOMER  PARTS BEING SUPPLIED  CUSTOMER SATISFACTION EVALUATED ON  NEXT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION EVALUATION DUE ON    REMARKS
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
  NOTE:- CUSTOMER SATISFACTION  EVALUATION TO BE CARRIED ONCE IN A YEAR

4.0   Customer Satisfaction Assessment Form

Customer Name :   Period Under Review:  
  Sl. #  Criteria DescriptionRating  Comments (If any)
12345
Dissatisfied   Fully Satisfied
1Quality
1.1Consistency in Product Quality to meet specified requirement / needs      
a)Chemical Properties      
b)Mechanical Properties      
c)Dimensional      
d)Draw Ability      
e)Appearance      
f)Product Performance      
1.2Knowledge about the products being supplied      
1.3Response time for attending quality problems and timely corrective action taken for avoiding recurrences      
1.4Line Disruptions / Stoppage due to Quality / Delivery problems      
1.5Field Returns / Warranty Issues      
1.6Supplies are mostly cleared for direct use      
1.7Any Notification / Penalty imposed due to Quality / Delivery Problems      
2Cost
2.1Fair pricing / transparency in dealings      
2.2Competitive prices and minor inflation’s absorbed through productivity      
3Delivery
3.1Supplies are made as per customer releases      
3.2Products supplied as per agreed packing norms.      
3.3Supplies are properly identified.      
3.4Defective supplies/ rejections are negligible.      
3.5Response to customer’s production schedule changes      
3.6Correctness of documentation.      
3.7Timely receipt of documentation      
3.8Timely information (Delivery status)      
3.9Premium freight paid if any      
4Management
4.1Supports customer’s vision and goal      
4.2Solution oriented approach      
4.3Attitudes of our employees to your needs      
4.4Accessibility of key personnel      
4.5Positive management attitude to your needs      
5Any other, (Please specify)RANK
 A (Top )BCDE (Poor ) 
6How do you rank Our Company as compared to other similar Suppliers?      
6.1If our rank as is lower, please suggest areas for improvements 
7Any other suggestions? 
Kindly specify any Specific Dis-satisfaction Indicators or Improvements required by you
Dis-satisfaction Indicators (Suggested by Customers)Dis-satisfaction Indicators observed above (If no indicators are suggested by Customer )
  
Signature:Name: Andrew Wilson
Date: 06/04/2019Designation: Quality Lead Tech
Thanks  you for sparing your valuable time

5.0 Internal Assessment For Customer Satisfaction

Customer Name  : —        Assessment  Year :-
  S.No.  Criteria Description  APR  MAY  JUN  JUL  AUG  SEP  OCT  NOV  DEC  JAN  FEB  MAR
  1Total No of lots Supplied            
  2No. of complaints in supplied lots (Q.A)            
  3No of lots with less quantity  supplied from schedule            
  4No. of lot supplied after scheduled delivery            
  5No. of lot supplied at premium freight            
  6Internal Customer Satisfation Index 
  Formula : 100- (0.2*Less qty. supplied from schedule +0.3No. Of lot supplied delay + 0.2 * No. of complaints in supplied lots + 0.2 lots rejected internaly of respective customer + 0.1 * No. of lot supplied at premium freight.

Example of documentation template for process of Contract Review in IATF

The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Contract Review in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. ​​If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.

1.0 Process Approach for process of Contract Review

2. Turtle Diagram for Contract Review

3. Contract Review

Customer Name ;           ………………………………………………….

Purchase Order No./ Dt;  ………………………………………………….

Part Name / No.             ………………………………………………………

Any Instruction               ………………………………………………………..

Check Points:

  Points  OkNot Ok
Price    
Quantity    
Specification    
Delivery Terms    
Packing    

Contract Accepted ………………………………………………….

Refer to customer for Clarification ( Given Details ) ………………………………………………….

Remarks                                                                                                                                                            Approved by

4.0 Order Amendment Sheet

Date : Order No:
Customer         : From                :
Product            : To                    :
Part Number     : Amendment Effective From :
Model               :  
Details Of Earlier OrderAmendment Details
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
                                                                                                    Signature / Date
ACTION TAKEN





      
PLANT Manager / DATEINCHARGE – PLANNING

5.0 CUSTOMER NEEDS ASSESSMENT FORM

Customer Name:Date:
Customer Representative Name: 
Part Description:Part No.:
Sl #Check PointsStatus / Description
1Drawing Received from Customer. (If Yes,  Drg No. with Rev / Amendment No:)YES / NO
2Is Drawing adequate? Discuss with Head (Engg) and record.YES / NO
3Does Customer want the approval of company transformed Drawings /  Spec / FMEA / Control Plan / PCS? Tick (3) as applicable.YES / NO
4Is / Are sample(s) received from Customer? If yes, mention Sample Number:YES / NO
  5  Finished Product Quantity Required :Per Day:
Per Week:
Per Month:
Per Year:
6Does customer have any approved suppliers of materials / components? If yes, provide details:YES / NO
7Will customer inspect the materials at Supplier end before the same are used at company end? If yes, provide details:YES / NO
  8Will Customer be supplying any materials (e.g. Raw Materials, Components, Packing Materials / Bins / Pallets, Tools, checking Gauges) for use / incorporation in product? If yes, provide details:  YES / NO
9Is there any customer requirement for Product Traceability? If yes, provide upto what extent:YES / NO
10What is the recommendation of customer for Lot Size of initial production run and number of samples for submission?Prodn Trial Run  =
Samples  =
11Is Ppk and / or Cpk desired by Customer? If Yes, provide Characteristics & values.Ppk  =
Cpk  =
12Does customer define any MSA manual? If Yes, Provide details:YES / NO
13Does customer specify any CAR response time ?Days =
14Does Customer have any Packaging Standard and / or requires any special markings / labels on the packing / product? If Yes, Provide details:YES / NO
  15Are there any Product Characteristics (fit,form,fuction ,durabilty etc referred in drawing /Spec )which are Safety Related / Critical / Major in view of the customer. If yes, provide details: 
16Are there any Govt / Statutory Regulations applicable on the product? If yes, details of same: 
17Will customer or his representative inspect each lot of the products prior to their release?YES / NO
18Is Test certificate required by the customer along with each supply sent to them?YES / NO
19Who will bear the transportation of Finished Product :Company / Customer
20Which Product Quality Planning (PQP) manual is recommended by customer (e.g. APQP (level required); Project Management etc.)?APQP/PJM/Customer Defined
    21Any Details available for competitor’s Product being supplied to Customer:
Rejection:
Rework:
Customer Returns:                        Line Rejections:                                   Warranty:                    Reliability:                                 
22Any specific records to be retained by the company and their period of Retention: (Provide Details)
23Other special Instructions (If any from customer?
24Are there any specfic manuals of Customer?
Signature:                                                                                     Date:
Name:                                                                                           Designation:

6.0 Customer Enquiry Register

Customer Decision Legend:
a) Dead Customer did not get the Order  b) Awarded : Tech Auto awarded the Project   c) Response Awaited : Customer still Awaiting Response from Customer d) Not Competitive : Tech Auto quote not competitive and project awarded to someone else
Sl. #Date of Enquiry  Part #  Project Description  Customer NameEnquiry Review DetailQuote DateQuote Details LocationCustomer Decision  P.O. #  P.O. DateContract Review DateContract Review Details  Remarks
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              
              

7.0 Feasibility Check List

Customer Name   :-Part No : Date: 
Part Description   :-Annual Volume: Per Day Volume:0
  Sl.#   Check Point  Assessment (Yes / No)  Any Clarifications reqd.  Responsibility  Target Date
  A   FEASIBILITY EVALUATION Feasibility factor No                                          Yes   
12345
1 Is Drawing Received for Quote  adequate ?        
2 Can existing raw material be used for new product.        
3 Are all specified tests, methods, equipment and acceptance criteria clearly defined and understood?        
4 Can specified requirements be evaluated by using known inspection techniques?        
5 Has all special characteristics been identified?        
6 Will all product testing be done in house?        
7 If not, is it done by an approved subcontractor ?        
8 Is the specified test sampling size and / or frequency feasible?        
9 Has material characteristics requiring inspection been identified?        
10 Will characteristics be checked in-house?        
11 Is a similar component being manufactured in the plant presently/previous        
12 Is test equipment available?        
13 Can the product be manufactured with available existing external Sources ?        
14 Can we assure for accurate results without any new Training ?        
15 Will outside laboratories be used?        
  16 Has following material requirements been considered:    
(a)Handling?        
(b)Storage?        
  17 Has lists been prepared identifying    
(a)New equipment, Tools, Gauges, Jig & Fixtures etc        
(b)New test equipment?        
18 Has process characteristics been identified?        
19 Were special product characteristics used in determining acceptance criteria?        
20 Has the customer approved the packing specification ?        
21 Do we have capacity for production?        
22 Is price of product known / costing details worked out?        
Feasibility Score0Out of total score of 1200.00%
  B   RISK ANALYSISRisk factor Low                                                                                                          High
12345678910
1 Is it all together a new product or with minor modification of existing products?          
2 Is it for a new ( High) or existing ( Low) customer?          
3 Does it require a new material or material already being used (New Material ( High) / Existing Material( Low))?          
4 Is investment in new machine required (Low / High) ?          
5 In case the enquiry is for a similar existing product, what is the present rejection level (Low / High)?          
Total Risk Factor (out of score of 50)0
Overall Assessment:
a) Design and Manufacturing – Feasible / Not Feasible (> 70 – Feasible)Not Feasible
c) Risk Involved                          – High / Low  (> 30 – High Risk)Low
Over all Comments (if any):
CFT Members:
Signature:Date
Person Name:Designation:
Below section to be filled in by Marketing Department only:
Decision Taken:              Send Quotation / Send Quotation Conditionally / Send Regret Letter / Negotiate with customer for better terms
Signature:Date:
Name:Designation: Director & VP Business Development

8.0 PREMIUM FREIGHT REGISTER

  S.NO  CUSTOMER  PART NAME /PART NO.  P.O NO. AT DATE  SCHEDULED DELIVERY DATEMODE OF TRANSPORT USED TO GET THE MATERIAL ON DUE DATEPREMIUM FREIGHT PAID TO GET THE MATERIAL ON SCHEDULE (EXCESS AMOUNT THAN WHAT IS MENTIONED IN  P.O)  REMARKS
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
 

Example of documentation template for process of customer complaint handling in IATF

The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of customer complaint Handling in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. ​​If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.

1.0 Process Approach of the process of Customer Complaint Handling.

2.0 Turtle Diagram of of the process of Customer Complaint Handling.

3.0 Customer Complaint Register

  Sr. No.  CUSTOMER  NATURE OF COMPLAINTDATESSTATUS
Complaint ReceiptForwarded to CFTAction TakenClosed / DateOpen
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        

4 CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTION ( 8-DISCIPLINE REPORT)

Part Name Model 
Part No. Supplier part No. 
Drg. Ref. Drg. Modification status 
Date Feedback form 
(1) PROBLEM AWARENESS
Problem ScopeProblem SeverityProblem Source                                           % Defect
  New Safety   
Regulatory 
Functioonal   
  Existing Aesthetic 
Reliability   
  Reopened 
Others   
(2) PROBLEM DEFINITION
 
(3) CONTAINMENT ACTION / SHORT TERM ACTION
NO.Immediate Action TakenCompletionResponsibleDate
     
     
(4) ROOT CAUSES (ttached root cause analysis Sheet -Fish Bone, Brainstorming,Pareto analysis,Why-Why analysis etc.)
 
(5) CORRECTIVE ACTIONS VERIFICATIONDATEMETHODRESULTS
  TARGETEFFECTIVE  
     
     
     
     
     
     
(6) PREVENTION (6) VERIFICATIONDATEMETHODRESULTS
 RESPONSIBILITYTARGETEFFECTIVE  
     
     
     
     
     
(7) REVIEW -DOCUMENTS / SYSTEM(Attach copies of all revised documents)
No.QMS DOCUMENTIF YESRESPONSIBLEPLANNED DATEACTUAL DATESTATUS
1Control Plan     
2Process sheet     
3Drawing / Process flow diagram     
4PFMEA / DFMEA / PPAP     
5Process Map     
6Acceptance Standard     
7PM checklist     
8Work Instruction / Calibration Plan     
(8) PROBLEM CLOSURE & SIGN-OFF
PROBLEM PROGRESS SUMMARYCLOSURE SIGN-OFF
S.No.PhaseStart dateEnd dateTeam MemberAreaSign-off
1Problem Definition     
2Containment action     
3Root cause analysis     
4Corrective action     
5Solution confirmation     
6Closure     
MANAGEMENT VERIFICATION & CLOSURE
Sign     
Date     
Name     
HeadManufacturing ChiefQuality ChiefDesign chiefmanagement RepresntativePlant Head

Example of documentation template for process of Dispatch of Finished products in IATF

The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for Process of Dispatch of Finished products in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. ​​If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.

1. Process Approach for process of Dispatch of finished Products

2) Turtle Diagram for process of Dispatch of finished Products

3) Domestic Dispatch Plan

DAILY CUM WEEKLY DISPATCH PLAN
  S. No  Customer Part No.  Part Description  Firm Schedule  Actual Dispatch  Balance  Disp %  Plan Vs ActualDispatch Plan(Date wise)
01.Apr02.Apr03.Apr04.Apr05.Apr06.Apr07.Apr08.Apr09.Apr10.Apr11.Apr12.Apr13.Apr14.Apr15.Apr16.Apr17.Apr18.Apr19.Apr20.Apr21.Apr22.Apr23.Apr24.Apr25.Apr26.Apr27.Apr28.Apr29.Apr30.Apr
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                
                                       
                                
                                

2) Export Dispatch Plan

Exports Dispatch Plan    DATE:
  Sr N o  Assy.    Part #    DescriptionReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.ReleaseDate of Disp.
  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty  Date  Qty
                               
            
            
            
            
            
            
                               
            
                               
                      
                      
                      
                               
                               
                               
                               
                               
                              
                              
                              
                               
                               
                            
                               
                               
                               
                               
                               
 

3) Stock Register

    Stock Register
Month:
  S.No.  DateComponent Name  Part No  Quantity  Remarks
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
PREPARED BY  Approved By

4) List of Approved Transporters

  LIST OF APPROVED TRANSPORTERS
  S.No.TRANSPORTER NAMEAPPROVED CRITERIACONTACT PERSONTELEPHONE NUMBER
LANDLINEMOBILE
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
  PREPARED BY                                                                  APPROVED BY

5) Daily dispatch Statement

    Daily Dispatch Statement
Month:   Customer Name :-
  S.No.  Inv No  Invoice Date  ASN No.  Part No  Part Name  Quantity  Case  GR WT  Vehicle No  Transport  Remarks
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
  PREPARED BY       Approved By

6) Monthly Dispatch Summary

        Sr.# 
Monthly Dispatch Summary
  Item Code  Item Name  Customer Name  Dispatch QtyBasic Amount  GSTFreight AmountTotal Amount
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
PREPARED BY   APPROVED BY

Example of documentation template for HR process in IATF

The following document templates (tool kits) are provided totally complimentary, free of charge to use as a starting point for HR process in IATF. As each business is different, additional documents or revisions would be required to meet your organization’s specific needs, requirements, context, risk profile, etc. ​​If after reading through all of these documents, you feel like you still need a consulting partner to help you develop your new documents – Contact Us. We’re always looking for interesting new clients and projects.

1) Process Approach of Employee Motivation

2. Process Approach of Training

3. Turtle Diagram for Employee Motivation and Training

3) Induction Program

 Date:Induction Programme  
All concerned HOD are requested to attend the new joinee for their Induction Training as per schedule given below:-
Name: 
Designation :
  S.N0  Department  TopicPerson to be contacted  Date  TimeSign of induction authority  Remarks if any
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
Prepared by:Approved by:

4) Employee Satisfaction Assessment Form

  .                                                                                SATISFACTION ASSESMENT FORM
DESIGNATION:( Mgr /Engineer/Operator) PERIOD UNDER REVIEW
1.0Please put (  X  )  in appropriate Box
 DescriptionRATINGRemarks
1 (low)2345 (high)
1.1Knowledge & support provided by Head of Deptt. (HOD)      
1.2Attitude of HOD towards me      
1.3Freedom to take initiatives      
1.4Recognition of my initiatives & work      
1.5Authority to carry out the responsibilities      
1.6Approach of HOD in case of mistakes      
1.7Training and Awareness about : Organizational Goals : Quality Systems   : Related Job      
     
     
     
1.8Motivation by management for innovation and Continual improvement      
1.9Awareness about the appraisal system & its effectiveness      
1.10FeeI to share my views without any fear      
1.11Freely sharing of information with in the organization/team      
1.12Job security in the organization      
1.13Salary paid on specified/fixed date      
1.14Cleaneless of the wash rooms      
1.15Implementation of statutory and regulatory requirments      
2.0    Answer the following      
2.1Are you aware of your departmental objectives? Can you name at least one 
2.2What was the major achievement of your Deptt. during last year ? 
2.3What are the major issues which affect the performance of your Deptt. ? 
2.4What are your major Responsibilities ? 
2.5How many suggestions you have made in the last one year ? 
2.6How do you rate your efficiency on a scale of 1-100 ? 
2.7Do you think efficiency can be improved  ? If yes, how ? 
2.8How many KAIZENS you have implemented during the last one year 

5) Annual Training Calendar (Internal)

 
        S.NO  ANNUAL TRAINING CALENDAR (INTERNAL/ External)
  TRAINING TOPICS  DEPTT.  FACULTY VENUEPL. VS ACH.  Total no to be TrainedPositionMonth
  Managers  Engineers  Supervisors  Operators    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    12    1    2    3
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
      PL.                 
  ACH.                 
  Prepared by:   Approved by:
 

6) Kaizen Suggestion slip

    DATE :
KAIZEN SUGGESTION SLIP
Suggested By :Deptt /MF :-Desgination :
Suggestion Detail :

























Accepted /Not AcceptedSign HOD  Sign Co- Ordinator

7) Kaizen Sheet

ProductivityQualityCostDeliverySafetyMethodEnergy
Kaizen  Theme :





Idea Originator:
Team Member’s :
Department:
Effectiveness (Y/N)
Problem Status :Results / Benefits :  Before Improvement :
Problem Analysis :Standardization :




After Improvement :




Why :.
Why ;
Root Cause :.Action taken :
Idea to Eliminate Root Cause :


Horizontal Deployment:


8) Training Attendance Sheet

TRAINING ATTENDANCE SHEET
  Faculty Name & Sign:
    S.No.    Participant Name    Date    Topic    Duration    Signature
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
PREPARED BYApproved By:

9) Training Feedback Form

Date:  TRAINING FEEDBACK FORM
TRAINING TOPIC : DATE TRAINING FACULTY:
PLEASE TICK THE APPROPRIATE
S.NOTITLETO GREAT EXTENTAVERAGETO SOME EXTENTNOT EFFECTIVELY
1.0Was the training useful ?    
2.0Was the training topic appropriate ?    
3.0How was the Presentation given by the faculty ?    
4.0Was the faculty able to commuicate properly ?    
5.0Were you given an opportunity to discuss yours problems?    
6.0Please give yours observation on duration of training programmeToo LongGoodAverageShort
    
7.0Name the topic which you feel needed greater stress/elaboration 
8.0Your’s comments on overall impact of Programme. 
  
9What suggestions do you have for improving the program? 
  
  Name of Participant
  Signature
  Deptt.

10) Training History Card

Name:Age:Qualification:Department:
Joining Date:Total Work Exp (in yrs):Date:from
S. NoCourse AttendedDateDurationFaculty/ Training AgencyRemarks
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

11) Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form (Managment)

Training TopicE.CodeNameTrg. DateDurationVenueInt./Ext.Conducted by
        
Training Objectives / Purpose
 
Comments by Faculty
  Class Room Evaluation by Faculty ( Marks obtained or observation if any ) 
    To be filled by TraineeWere you given a chance to implement the learning of the training on job?YesNoSignatature of Trainee  Remarks
Please list down at least 2 projects/Areas in which you have used the learning?
   
Review by Dept. Head
Has the employee been able to implement the learning on the job? If yes, please explain how, if no then why?
1st Review Ratings2nd Review Ratings        Remarks 
  Date:  Date:
Signatature of  Immediate Supervisor 
Signatature of  Dept Head 
For HR Use
Overall Rating Signatature of  HR  Head 
Further evaluation required / Retraining Yes No 
Note:
The ratings would be based on five points scale namely, 1=Poor, 2=Average, 3=Good, 4=Very Good and 5=Outstanding1st Review will be done at the end of the one month from the date of training, 2nd review shall be done after 6 monthsThis evaluation format to be used only for staff level employees.
Prepared by:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Approved by:

11A) Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form (General)

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form.
    Training Topic:   Trg.Date:
    Evaluation Date:   Trg.Faculty:
    Name:  
    Code:  
    Department:  
Effectiveness check
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
    Overall Rating:       HOD SIG :
    The ratings would be based on five point scale namely,1=Poor(20%-40%),2=Average(41%-50%),3=Good(51%-60%),4=Very good(61%-80%),and 5=Outstanding(81%-90%)
  For HR use only
  Further Evaluation Required/Retraining: 
NOTE1.Effectiveness will be find out within 3 month from the date of training.
2.Retraining is requried if overall rating is below 60%

12) On Job Training

  DATE                                                                                             TOPIC
  S.No.  Participant Name  Existing/New employee  DEPTTSIGNATURE OF PARTICIPANT  REMARKS OF TRAINER
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
SIGNATURE OF TRAINER 

13) Job Description Format

Job Details
  Job Title   Department 
Reporting to Grade 
Jobs Reporting Into Location/Unit 
  No. of Reportees (Direct & Indirect) 
Job Objective
 
  Primary Responsibilities
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
Key Result Areas (KRAs) & Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
 
    
  
  
  
Key Interfaces
InternalExternal
¢¢
  Desired Qualifications, Experience & Competencies
  Desired Qualifications 
  Desired Experience 
  Knowledge & Skills 
    Competencies 
  PREPARED BY:  APPROVED BY:

14) Action for Motivation/ Improvement

  FUNCTION / DEPARTMENT:
S.NO.IMPROVEMENT AREAACTION PLANNED /REQUIREDRESPONSIBILITYTARGET DATESTATUS
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
  PREPARED BY  APPROVED BY

16) Skill Matrix

17.0 Competence Matrix

DEPTT:   
DOC.REF.DEPTT/COMPETENCE MATRIXDATE:
REVISION:00:Page :   1   of   1
Sr. No.Level of PersonnelEducational QualificationExperience RequiredSkill Required (If any)Remarks
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
        
      

18.0 Responsibility Matrix

                                 RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX
DEPTT:              
DOC.REF.DEPTT/RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX  DATE:
`REVISION:00:Page :   1   of   1
S.NO.Name of PersonDesignationResponsibility
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

IATF 16949:2016 clause 5.3.1 Organizational roles responsibilities and authorities and 5.3.2 Responsibility and authority for product requirements and corrective actions

Top Management is defined as the person or group of people who directs and controls an organization at the highest level (within the scope of the quality management system). Top Management has the power to delegate authority and provide resources within the organization. Top management must ensure that the responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles are assigned, communicated, and understood within the organization. The top management must primarily take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS and understand that its success or failure depends on them. Defining the Quality Policy and objectives is a task that cannot be fulfilled without the engagement of the top management, as both the policy and the objectives must be aligned with the context and strategic direction of the organization.  The QMS must be integrated with the business processes of the organization, and this is also a responsibility of the top management. The provision of resources for QMS operation is also part of the top management responsibilities, as, without the appropriate resources, the QMS cannot work. Promoting the use of the process approach and risk-based thinking, along with communicating the importance of the effectiveness of the QMS and compliance with the requirements. Engaging, directing, and supporting personnel to contribute to the effectiveness of the QMS, and supporting other management roles to demonstrate leadership in their areas of responsibility. Defining the corporate responsibility policy, which needs to include an anti-bribery policy, the employees’ code of conduct, and an ethics escalation policy (whistle-blowing policy). Identifying process owners who will be in charge of managing the processes and related outputs. Conducting management reviews in order to assess the condition and performance of the QMS and define necessary actions for improvement.

In addition to the roles and responsibilities that the top management must take,  the top management must assign to the mid-management and other employees within the organization:

  • Conformity of the QMS to the requirements of the standard – one or more persons in the organization needs to be responsible for the overall conformity to the standard.
  • Process effectiveness – the top management must assign responsibilities to ensure that the processes are delivering the intended outcomes; this is in close relation with the requirement to assign process owners.
  • Reporting on QMS performance – some person within the organization must be in charge of reporting to the top management on the performance of the QMS and opportunities for improvement.
  • Ensuring the QMS integrity during maintenance and changes in the system – this person will have to be responsible for ensuring that compliance with the standard and other requirements is preserved during maintenance or changes made to the QMS.
  • Compliance with customer requirements – considering the importance of the customer requirements in an IATF 16949-based QMS, it is no wonder that the standard requires the top management to assign responsibility for ensuring and documenting customer requirements.
  • Stopping the production and shipment in case of nonconformity – the top management must assign authority to relevant people to stop the production or prevent the shipment of non-conforming products to the customers.
  • Responsibility for corrective actions – the persons with this authority must be informed about any nonconformity regarding products or processes, so they can prevent the shipment of nonconforming or potentially nonconforming products to the customers.
  • Conformity to product requirements – the top management must ensure that all processes and shifts include adequate personnel who are in charge of the product’s conformity to the requirements.

A good audit system is also imperative. At any time an audit report is carried out, a number of variables have to be investigated in order to permit certification. This is the reason that it’s crucial to select a really good provider of an audit management system. The efficiency of an audit investigation is significant to an operation’s longevity. Thus, ensure that each audit investigation is undertaken as professionally as it can be.

5.3 Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

For explanation click here. 

5.3.1 Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities – supplemental

Top management has to choose personnel with the responsibility who will make sure that customer requirements are taken care of. They need to document these personnel. Customer requirements includes things like selecting special characteristics, setting quality quality, providing training, corrective and preventive action, product design and development, planning how much can be made, sharing information about logistics, using customer scorecards, and customers portals.

5.3.2 Responsibility and authority for product requirements and corrective actions

Top management needs to make sure that the people in charge of making sure products meet the requirements have the power to halt shipping and production if there are quality issues to correct them. If stopping production right away isn’t possible because of process design, the problematic batch should be kept separate, and sending it to the customer should be stopped. People who can fix problems need to know right away that the product or process does not meet the requirements. . They need to ensure that those product that do not meet the requirement doesn’t get sent to the customer and that any possible problems are found and controlled. Each shift during production should have someone in charge of making sure the products meet the requirements.

Top management must establish the organization necessary to deploy the QMS. It must define the structure, hierarchy and lines of reporting. Additionally perhaps, through the assistance of the Human Resources function, it must ensure that the duties, responsibilities and authority of all personnel are defined and communicated. All personnel must be clear on their duties, responsibilities and authority in meeting customer and regulatory requirements. Organization charts, job descriptions, procedures, work instructions, etc, are some of the many ways that top management may use to define and document this. These must be communicated and deployed, as applicable, throughout the organization. Orientation packages, appointment postings, sign-off on job descriptions, training on procedures and work instructions, etc, are some of the many ways in accomplishing this. The organization structure and lines of reporting; responsibility and authority of managerial functions and departments may be established by top management (business planning) and the responsibilities and authorities for the rest of the organization may be established by the HR function working with various process owners. Again, this would depend on the size, complexity and culture of the organization. The communication process must ensure timely reporting of serious product or process to higher-level staff with authority and responsibility for decision making and provision of resources for taking corrective action. When product or process problems occur, the process for handling nonconformities must include a review of what actions, decisions, responsibilities, timing, etc, were involved in causing the problem to arise. Accountability across all shifts, for the actions taken as a result, should be reviewed. The Control Plan must also be reviewed in terms of its effectiveness or inability to prevent nonconformity. The responsibilities, authority, rules and conditions under which production is stopped to correct quality problems must be carefully defined. Contingency planning to minimize delivery disruptions to customers must be taken into consideration. Ensure that any staff delegated with responsibility for product quality is adequately trained and is available on site or if off-site, is quickly available or accessible to verify product quality. The objective here is not to disrupt shift operations or cause shipping delays by creating a backlog of the product requiring inspection for the next shift. The performance indicators for the business planning, HR process and QMS processes may be used to determine the effectiveness of planning and managing the organizational structure, responsibilities and authorities. IATF 16949 focuses heavily on meeting customer and regulatory requirements and enhancing customer satisfaction. The MR must likewise promote this focus through all processes that are directly and even indirectly involved in achieving this. There are many ways of doing this including the use of training, cross-functional teams, customer-focused project teams, project milestone reviews, designated customer representative, electronic interfaces with the customer, use of PPAP, FMEA’s, Control Plans, customer specifications, customer product-specific work instructions, etc. The designated customer representative and their specific responsibilities must be clearly defined.  They must ensure that customer requirements are fully understood and addressed. A good way to address this, is for the customer representative to participate in the entire APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) process. Review specific requirements for the customer representative at OEM customer or IATF websites.  The effective fulfillment of the customer representative’s responsibilities may be demonstrated by their participation in milestone and decision points related to production release ie engineering release and other related activities linked to customer requirements.

Responsibility and authority

The requirements on responsibility and authority are in two parts: one general and the other relating to people with particular roles

Identifying Process that affects the quality

The responsibility, authority, and interrelation of personnel who manage, perform and verify Processes affecting quality is to be defined and documented. The key to this requirement is determining what affects quality; i.e. if you can identify any Processes that does not affect quality, you are not obliged to define in your quality system the responsibilities and authority of those who manage, perform, or verify it. In principle, every process affects the quality of the products and services supplied by the organization, some directly, others indirectly. The process can be divided into result-producing, support, and housekeeping activities. All are essential to the business but only the result-producing and support activities affect the quality of the products and services supplied. The result-producing activities are those which directly bring in revenue and which contribute to results, such as sales, marketing, development, manufacture, and maintenance. The support activities are usually those which set standards, create the vision, produce information needed by the result-producers, provide teaching, training, and advice, such as research, computer services, quality assurance, training, and personnel. Housekeeping activities are those which do not contribute to results but their malfunction could harm the business, such as health and safety, security, catering, travel, medical, general maintenance, etc.

Apart from result-producing activities, there are several other activities that could affect quality:

  • A failure to observe government health and safety regulations could close a factory for a period and hence result in late delivery to customers.
  • Health and safety hazards could result in injury or illness, place key personnel out of action for a period, and hence result in work not being done or being done by personnel who are not competent.
  • A failure to take adequate personnel safety precautions may put the product at risk.
  • A failure to safely dispose of hazardous materials and observe fire precautions could put the plant at risk.

If there are personnel involved with the identification, interpretation, promulgation, and verification of such regulations then their responsibilities and authority will need to be defined in the quality system.

What is “responsibility and authority”?

Responsibility is in simple terms an area in which one is entitled to act on one’s own accord. It is the obligation of staff to their managers for performing the duties of their jobs. It is thus the obligation of a person to achieve the desired conditions for which they are accountable to their managers. If you caused something to happen, you must be responsible for the result just as you would if you caused an accident — so to determine a person’s responsibility, ask “What can you cause to happen?”

Authority is in simple terms the right to take actions and make decisions. In the management context, it constitutes a form of influence and a right to take action, to direct and coordinate the actions of others, and to use discretion in the position occupied by an individual, rather than in the individual themselves. The delegation of authority permits decisions to be made more rapidly by those who are in more direct contact with the problem.

It is necessary for management to define who should do what in order that the designated work is assigned to someone to carry out. It is not cost-effective to have duplicate responsibilities or gaps in responsibility as this leads to conflict or tasks being overlooked. A person’s job can be divided into two components: actions and decisions. Responsibilities and authority should therefore be described in terms of the actions assigned to an individual to perform and discretion delegated to an individual: that is, the decisions they are permitted to take along with the freedom they are permitted to exercise. Each job should therefore have core responsibilities, which provide a degree of predictability, and innovative responsibilities, which in turn provide the individual with scope for development. In defining responsibilities and authority there are some simple rules that you should follow:

  • Through the process of delegation, authority is passed down within the organization and divided among subordinate personnel, whereas responsibility passes upwards.
  • A manager may assign responsibilities to a subordinate and delegate authority, however, they remain responsible for the subordinate’s use of that authority.
  • When managers delegate responsibility for something, they remain responsible for it. When managers delegate authority they lose the right to make the decisions they have delegated but remain responsible and accountable for the way such authority is used. Accountability is one’s control over the authority one has delegated to one’s staff.
  • It is considered unreasonable to hold a person responsible for events caused by factors that they are powerless to control.
  • Before a person can be in a state of control they must be provided with three things:
    1. Knowledge of what they are supposed to do: i.e. the requirements of the job, the objectives they are required to achieve.
    2. Knowledge of what they are doing, provided either from their own senses or from an instrument or another person authorized to provide such data.
    3. Means of regulating what they are doing in the event of failing to meet the prescribed objectives. These means must always include the authority to regulate and the ability to regulate both by varying the person’s own conduct and by varying the process under the person’s authority. It is in this area that freedom of action and decision should be provided.
  • The person given responsibility for achieving certain results must have the right (i.e. the authority) to decide how those results will be achieved, otherwise, the responsibility for the results rests with those who stipulate the course of action.
  • Individuals can rightfully exercise only that authority which is delegated to them and that authority should be equal to that person’s responsibility (not more or less than it). If people have authority for action without responsibility, it enables them to walk by problems without doing anything about them. Authority is not power itself. It is
    quite possible to have one without the other! A person can exert influence without the right to exert it.
  • In the absence of the delegation of authority and assignment of responsibilities, individuals assume duties that may duplicate those duties assumed by others. Thus jobs that are necessary but unattractive will be left undone. It also encourages decisions to be made only by top management, resulting in an increasing management work-load and engendering a feeling of mistrust in the workforce.

Defining responsibilities and authority

The actual documentation of responsibilities within your QMS is as important as the planning and decisions that go into the process. Though there is no specific mention of “documented information” in terms of roles and responsibilities, the standard says that the organization should maintain documented information “determined as being necessary for QMS effectiveness.” Great care must be taken to ensure that, when delivered to an employee, roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, clearly measurable, have a clear definition of time periods relevant to the activities, and are aligned to the capabilities of the employee. When roles and responsibilities are documented so specifically, clear review and action periods can be set. The organization can then readily identify how much progress is being made, maintaining clarity in terms of the responsibility for the delivery of activity important to the QMS. Ensure that your roles and responsibilities are correctly allocated, defined, and documented, and the business of ensuring continual improvement for your QMS will become much more achievable The responsibilities and authority should be documented in addition to being defined, as one can define such things in dialogue with one’s staff without documenting them. This is indeed a common way for staff to discover their responsibilities. Sometimes you may not be aware of the limits of your authority until you overstep the mark. By documenting the responsibility and authority of staff, managers should be able to avoid such surprises.

There are four principal ways in which responsibilities and authority can be documented:

  • In an organization structure diagram, or organigram
  • In job descriptions
  • In terms of reference
  • In procedures

The standard does not stipulate which method should be used. In very small companies a lack of such documents defining responsibility and authority may not prove detrimental to quality provided people are made aware of their responsibilities and adequately trained. However, if you are going to rely on training, there has to be some written material which is used so that training is carried out to consistent standards. Organigrams are a useful way of showing interrelationships (see below) but imprecise as a means of defining responsibility and authority. They do illustrate the lines of authority and accountability but only in the chain of command. Although organigrams can define the area in which one has authority to act, they do not preclude others having responsibilities within the same area; for example, the title “Design Manager — Computer Products” implies the person could be responsible for all aspects of computer product design when in fact they may not have any software, mechanical engineering, or reliability engineering responsibilities. Titles have to be kept brief as they are labels for communication purposes and are not usually intended for precision on the subject of responsibilities and authority. One disadvantage of organigrams is that they do not necessarily show the true relationships between people within the company. Horizontal relationships can be difficult to depict with clarity in a diagram. They should therefore not be used as a substitute for policy.

Job descriptions or job profiles are useful in describing what a person is responsible for. However, it rather depends upon the reason for having them as to whether they will be of any use in managing quality. Those produced for job evaluation, recruitment, salary grading, etc. may be of use in the quality system if they specify the objectives people are responsible for achieving and the decisions they are authorized to take. Terms of reference are not job descriptions but descriptions of the boundary conditions. They act as statements that can be referred to in deciding the direction in which one should be going and the constraints on how to get there. They are more like rules than a job description and more suited to a committee than an individual. They rarely cover responsibilities and authority except by default. Procedures are probably the most effective way of defining people’s responsibilities and authority as it is at the level of procedures that one can be specific as to what someone is required to do. Procedures specify individual actions and decisions. By assigning actions or decisions to a particular person you have assigned to them a responsibility or given them certain authority. Procedures do present problems, however, it may be difficult for a person to see clearly what his/her job is by scanning the various procedures because procedures often describe tasks rather than objectives. When writing procedures never use the names of individuals as they will inevitably change. The solution is to use position or role titles and have a description for a particular position or role that covers all the responsibilities assigned through the procedures. Individuals only need to know what positions they occupy or the roles they perform. Their responsibilities and authority are clarified by the procedures and the position or role descriptions.

Within IATF 16949 there are several requirements for an assignment of responsibility. These include  but not limited to the responsibility and authority for:

  • Defining the quality policy and objectives
  • Determining customer satisfaction
  • Representing the needs of the customer
  • Stopping production to correct quality problems
  • Assigning trained personnel
  • Appointing the management representative
  • Reviewing business plans
  • Promoting quality awareness
  • Promoting safety awareness
  • Conducting the management review
  • Quality planning
  • Assigning the project manager
  • Reporting product realization measurements to management
  • Conducting project reviews
  • Carrying out FMEA
  • Performing process studies
  • Performing process design verification
  • Developing control plans
  • Submitting product approval requests
  • Accepting contracts
  • Reviewing product designs
  • Performing product design verification and validation
  • Reviewing product design changes
  • Reviewing and approving documents and changes thereto
  • Evaluating and selecting subcontractors Subcontractor assessment
  • Reviewing and approving purchasing documents
  • Verifying product at subcontractor’s premises
  • Reporting lost or unsuitable customer supplied product to customers
  • Planning production, installation, and servicing processes
  • Verifying job set-ups
  • Verifying product
  • Performing layout inspection
  • Checking comparative references
  • Calibrating inspection, measuring, and test equipment
  • Notifying customers of nonconforming product shipment
  • Reviewing and disposing of nonconforming product
  • Obtaining authorization to deviate from customer approved specifications
  • Handling customer complaints
  • Investigating the cause of nonconforming product
  • Determining corrective and preventive actions
  • Receiving product into and dispatching product from storage areas
  • Issuing shipment notifications to customers
  • Planning, conducting, and reporting on internal quality audits
  • Identifying training needs and providing training
  • Reviewing training effectiveness
  • Reporting that servicing meets requirements
  • Identifying the need for statistical techniques

In organizations that undertake projects rather than operate continuous processes or production lines, there is a need to define and document project-related responsibilities and authority. These appointments are often temporary, being only for the duration of the project. Staff are assigned from the line departments to fulfill a role for a limited period. To meet the requirement for defined responsibility, authority, and interrelationships for project organizations you will need Project Organization Charts and Project Job Descriptions for each role (such as Project Manager, Project Design Engineer, Project Systems Engineer, and Project Quality Engineer). As project structures are temporary, there needs to be a system in place that controls the interfaces between the line functions and the project team. Such a system would include:

  • Policies that govern the allocation of work to projects
  • Policies that govern the allocation of work to staff on these projects
  • Job descriptions for each role, stating responsibilities, authority, and accountability
  • Procedures that identify the roles responsible for each task and for ensuring that information is conveyed to and from these staff at the appropriate time
  • Procedures that consolidate information from several disciplines for transmission to the customer when required
  • Monitoring procedures to track progress and performance
  • Procedures that ensure the participation of all parties in decisions affecting the product and its development and production
  • Procedures for setting priorities and securing commitment
  • Procedures that include the management of subcontractor programs during development and deal with the transmission of information to and from the subcontractors, what is to be transmitted, by whom, in what form, and with whose approval

Some organizations have assigned responsibility for each element of the standard to a person, but such managers are not thinking clearly. For some elements, the assignment of responsibility may appear possible, as in the case of  Design control and Purchasing, but when you come to examine it more closely you will find that the task is not so easy. If we look at purchasing we find that it is made up of many actions and decisions, such as defining the technical requirement, evaluating the supplier, choosing the supplier, placing the order, monitoring the supply, inspecting the goods on receipt, etc. No one person other than the CEO is responsible for all of these actions unless it is a small company. The Purchasing Manager may not accept responsibility for errors in the technical specification invoked in the purchase order if he/she did not prepare or approve the technical specification. When auditors ask “Who is responsible for purchasing?” ask them to specify the particular activity they are interested in. Remember you have a system that delegates authority to those qualified to do the job.

Interrelation of personnel

Defining individual responsibilities and authority alone will not define how personnel relates to one another. Interrelation means to place in a mutual relationship, so what is needed is a definition of the relationships between all staff with quality responsibilities. The primary reason for defining interrelationships is to establish channels of communication so that work proceeds smoothly without unplanned interruption. Staff needs to know from whom they will receive their instructions, to whom they are accountable, to whom they should go to seek information to resolve difficulties, and to whom information or product should be submitted when complete. Personnel within a company are related in several ways:

  • By position in a reporting hierarchy
  • By position in a chain of operations as internal customers and suppliers of information, product, or service
  • By position in a salary-grading structure
  • By job title, profession, type of work
  • By location, i.e. being on the same site but not in the same department, group, or division

In order for personnel to achieve a common objective (product or service quality) they must relate to one another — they must interact. Work passes from one person to another, from one department to another and often this relationship is quite different from the hierarchical relationship of personnel in the company. In order to meet this particular requirement it is, therefore, necessary to:

  • Define the structure of the company, preferably in a diagrammatic form showing each department and section whose work affects quality. (You don’t have to define all parts of the company.)
  • Define the location of work, departments, groups, and divisions.
  • Define the processes that manage, specify, achieve, and control product/service quality and who performs each stage in the process, preferably in the form of flow diagrams.

Action to prevent nonconformity

Initiating action to prevent something is not the same as preventing something from taking place. You can prevent something from happening either by not starting the process or by stopping it before a nonconformity has occurred. The only people who should prevent the occurrence of product or process nonconformity are those in control of the process — those operating the machines, producing the results, doing the work — or those people who manage or supervise such people. It would not be right for anyone not responsible for the process to exert power over it, such as stopping the process or changing the material, the documentation, the instructions, or the personnel. In addition to the managers of the process,  the quality auditors should be given the authority to initiate action to prevent nonconformity but if you do this, such authority should override that of those in control of the process. In other words, if the auditor requires some action to be taken to prevent the recurrence of nonconformity, he has to do more than notify those in control of the process, otherwise, such notification could be ignored. The reason for doing this is for ensuring that the requirements of the standard are met. Authority to initiate means authority to cause someone to take action. It does not give the initiator the right to specify what action to take. However, the receiver of the instruction must either obey it or escalate it to higher management. Regarding nonconformities relating to the quality system, anyone should be permitted to request a change to the quality system documentation to prevent the occurrence of nonconformities; however, only a person’s manager should be permitted to issue instructions to his/her staff enforcing compliance with the documented quality system. The Top Management can and should, however, instruct other managers to comply with the agreed policies and practices.

Identifying  and recording problems

A problem is a difference between the way things are and the way things ought to be, as perceived by the one identifying it. A problem relating to the product, process, or quality system (or quality problem) is, therefore, a difference between what has been achieved and what is required. The organization must identify the responsibilities and authority who need to identify and record such problems. Any organization should provide an environment that encourages all employees to contribute to the business, but unfortunately, this is not so in many organizations. There may well be some merit in limiting such freedom in order that management is not swamped with fictitious problems. It all comes down to deciding who is in a position to be able to tell whether a situation is a problem and whether it affects quality. Certainly, managers and professional staff should be free to identify problems because they should have the knowledge to report only problems that can be resolved. To provide staff with the necessary freedom you will need one or more problem-reporting procedures and some policies that give staff the freedom to identify, record, and report problems relating to the product, process, and quality system.

Initiating or providing solutions

 Managers of the functions concerned should have the authority to initiate solutions to problems arising in their areas of responsibility. Experts and other personnel used in an advisory capacity should also be given authority to make recommendations and provide solutions. However, you may wish to limit such powers. You will not want just anyone to influence those resolving the problems. Those not qualified to give advice on certain subjects should not have the authority to do so. There have been many cases where a person has taken unqualified advice to find that they should not have done so. Hence the requirement that solutions be provided through designated channels. You will therefore need some policy to ensure that the credentials of those giving advice are checked before the advice is accepted. Likewise, there should be a policy that ensures staff takes the advice given by qualified personnel unless they can justify otherwise. There is no point in an organization employing experts and then allowing their advice to be ignored. If the experts are no good it is better to replace them!

Verifying the implementation of solutions 

The person resolving the problem should be the person who caused it or, if this is not possible or appropriate, it should be the person responsible for the result. This person should also verify that they have implemented the solution correctly, but there may be a need for others to verify that the solution resolves the problem; for example, the person detecting the problem may be a customer. Quite often the solution implemented may not, in fact, resolve the original problem. This could be due to poor communication or to politics. In addition, the designer of the solution may decide to take the opportunity to change things that were perhaps not perfect but found them less costly to change in conjunction with other changes. Where such changes may result in the problem not being solved, it becomes more important that the verification be carried out by someone other than the designer. You will need to define who has the authority to verify certain types of solutions, such as new products, design changes, policy changes, planning changes, procedures changes, or process changes. They may be the same people who verified the original designs, plans, procedures, etc. but could be different if you have product support, maintenance, or post—design organization.

Control of nonconforming product

There are three separate requirements here. Control of further processing involves stopping the process and, as explained previously, should be carried out only by those responsible for the process. Controlling further delivery is somewhat different, as the authority to deliver may not be vested in the same person who performed the processing. Delivery decisions are more than decisions about conformance to specification. They are about conformance to contract and those responsible for the production processes may not be able to determine whether contractual conditions have been met. Much more may hang on the resolution of a problem than mere conformance to specification. The decision in some circumstances may be taken by the CEO. There may have been a safety problem or a product liability problem so your system needs to recognize these fine distinctions. Those making the delivery decisions need possession of all the information required to protect the company as well as meet customer needs. Installation decisions are similar to process decisions and the decision to start or stop further installation work should rest with those responsible for installation. If the materials have not been delivered they cannot be installed, so the key decision, in this case, is the delivery decision.

Meeting customer requirement (Customer representative)

The organization must ensure that appropriate individuals be assigned to represent the needs of the customer in internal functions. Each customer may have slightly different requirements, many of them often have no impact on product quality but on the presentation of information. If you characterize products and processes too closely to specific customer requirements, you run the risk of introducing inefficiencies and reducing productivity. You can, however, maintain productivity and respond to your customer’s varying demands through an interface function. Appointing a person as your customer liaison representative provides an opportunity to develop someone in your organization who knows as much about what the customers need and why it is needed as the customers themselves. This person is then able to translate specific customer requirements into your language and back again. So rather than change all your processes to suit all your customers, translate customer requirements onto your own paperwork and use this throughout the process. At the end of the chain of processes, NAATI translation uses to your paperwork onto customer forms and supply these to your customer. Where a customer wants something that others have not yet demanded, consider the overall benefits, and if it does provide added value change your processes. If not, find a compromise that is mutually beneficial. The appointed customer representative will need to spend some time with the customer to learn their ways and understand their language, needs, and expectations. Hence if your staff speaks English and you do business with Chinese companies you may need people who can speak Chinese and who are familiar with the appropriate subject vocabulary. Beware, however, that in appointing such a person you choose wisely. It also has to be someone you can trust to represent your interests. You will need a means of calibrating this person so that he/she does not get carried away with enthusiasm and start to impose requirements that are no more than personal likes and dislikes.

If you need assistance or have any doubt and need to ask any question contact me at preteshbiswas@gmail.com . You can also contribute to this discussion and I shall be happy to publish them. Your comment and suggestion are also welcome.

IATF 16949:2016 Clause 5.1.1.3 Process owners

Process Owner is a person who has the ultimate responsibility for the performance of a process in realizing its objectives measured by key process indicators and has the authority and ability to make necessary changes. A Process Owner is a person immediately accountable for creating, sustaining, and improving a particular process, as well as, being responsible for the outcomes of the process. A process owner is responsible for managing and overseeing the objectives and performance of a process through Key Performance Indicators (KPI). A process owner has the authority to make required changes related to achieving process objectives. A process owner is usually someone in management, not a team or committee. You need a single point of contact that is accountable for the overall process. Of course, the process owner may establish a process leader and team to help set up, operate, and support the process. Process owner responsibilities include:

  • Developing, deploying and managing process.
  • Explaining the purpose of a process
  • Ensuring process objectives
  • Determining, implementing and monitoring metrics( KPIs).
  • Improving process performance.
  • Ensuring quality reporting
  • Negotiating other process conflicts with respective process owners
  • Requesting required employee training
  • Reviewing, approving and communicating process changes and/or improvements
  • Driving towards system improvement goals.
  • Periodically presenting to Leadership the current state of improvement and opportunities.
  • Representing their co-workers during internal assessments and third party assessments
  • Advising management of process breaches or interruptions

Clause 5.1.1.3 Process owners

Top management needs to find people to be in charge of managing the organization’s processes as process owners and their outputs. These process owners must know what they’re supposed to do and be good at doing their roles.

To understand the term “process owner”, lets begin with the definition of a process. A Process is a set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs. The inputs of a process are the outputs from other processes. And, processes are planned and carried out under controlled conditions to add value. A Business Process consists of a series of tasks that receives a product or service (the input) from a supplier, adds value to that product or service through some transformation (the process), and then delivers a product or service of more value (output) to a customer. All business transactions take place through business processes that connect in a series to form Business Systems. We typically find somewhere between 8-16 business processes per Business System.

A Process Owner is a person who is given the responsibility and authority for managing a particular process. A Process Owner is designated by the Top Management to be responsible for the development, maintenance and enhancement of a specific process within the Management System. The Process Owner should have a clear understanding of and be closely involved with the assigned process on a daily basis. It is not necessary to select a supervisor for this role. For example, it can be beneficial to choose a subject matter expert. Most organizations find it useful to appoint individual process owners and define their responsibilities as ensuring the implementation, maintenance, and improvement of their specific process and its interactions with other processes. Process owners take an organization-wide view of their processes. They may not truly “own” the process in that some of the people who are involved in carrying out the process may not report to them. Instead, the owner is responsible for the design of the process, in other words, how it is carried out, how it interacts with other processes, and how it is measured. And, this responsibility is an ongoing task. Process owners have responsibility for their specific process, end-to-end. However, as stated earlier, this does not mean that all the staff involved in a process actually report to the process owner. Process owners usually have responsibility for most steps in the process and are able to influence other key areas outside their direct organizational control. The owner is assigned a specific process of the Management System and is responsible for documenting, developing and continuously improving the system. If an employee wishes to change the process, that person must work through the Process Owner. The owner also works actively and cooperatively with other linked process owners and subject matter experts to ensure enterprise wide continuity and optimization. Characteristics of a good Process Owner include:

  • Flexibility and good people skills. A good owner wants to share knowledge with others. It is important to be objective and open to suggestions for change.
  • Knowledge. The owner must have a strong understanding of the technical and practical aspects of the process and be able to explain and educate others.
  • Commitment. The owner must care and ensure that the process equals best practice.
  • Subject Matter expert: The owner is aware of the entire process in detail, including the inputs, output, raw materials and resources required, supplier requirements, customer requirements, Interactions with other processes and so on.
  • Owns the Process Performance: The person is responsible for the KPIs, Metrics, Cost incurred, Profit & Loss Account of the process, ups and downs of the performance, Corrective and Preventive actions to be taken, and changes to be done in the process.
  • Manages Training & Feedback: Responsible for the skills and knowledge of his team members and Leads. He specifies the skills to be looked at while hiring, identifies training needs, designs the training curriculum, assess and provide performance feedback for his team.
  • Manages the Team: The owner sets the goal for the team based on organization’s vision and goal, leads the team on adhering to the process and policies, encourages and motivates team for performance improvement, sets a career path for his team members.

Process owners can use the Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology to improve their processes: 1) planning what to do and how to do it, 2) doing what was planned, 3) checking the results to see if things happened according to plan, and 4) acting to improve the process the next cycle.

First and foremost, a process owner should be performing management duties, not clerical duties. At the highest level, management includes the planning, managing, and supporting of performance. A process owner should be doing all those activities for a given process. Planning includes setting performance goals for the process that are derived from organizational goals. The goals and support plans of the functional areas that participate in the process should cascade from those process goals. The process owner should be actively engaged with functional leaders to determine what kinds of resources are needed to enable and support the process and then to get commitments from the functions to provide those needed resources. This planning and resource allocation activity includes determining if the process is capable of meeting organizational goals, which means regularly assessing the condition of the process in question, and then initiating, sponsoring, and steering the improvement efforts that will make the process capable. But the role does not include doing the improvements – process ownership is not a role for the Black Belt specialist. As for ongoing management, the process owner role should include regular reviews of process performance and capability, and re-planning or adjusting as necessary. This monitoring of process performance should be driven by both process and function metrics that help the process owner and functional managers understand where performance deviations are occurring and agree on what the corrective actions should be. Process owners should ensure the following activities are completed:

  • Define a process that can be easily subjected to audit
  • Describe its links and interactions with other processes
  • Identify its documentation and training requirements
  • Issue and maintain any procedures and instructions
  • Implement processes consistent with the quality policy
  • Make available necessary resources and information
  • Operate and control an effective and efficient process
  • Resolve any problems and prevent their recurrence
  • Communicate process changes to the process users
  • Define and manage interfaces with other processes
  • Communicate input requirements to internal suppliers
  • Meet the output requirements of internal customers
  • Analyze performance data and set quality objectives
  • Track progress against process performance targets
  • Communicate with process users to identify issues
  • Identify risks and opportunities with current process
  • Investigate and propose process improvements

Role of the Process Owner

Creating effective process owners is never an easy task. It frequently means changing deeply ingrained management perspectives and behaviors. It also means spanning organizational silos and reorienting their management world view to focus on what links rather than differentiates functions. Companies often complicate this evolution because they fail to adopt incentives to motivate management behavior in line with the company’s new process orientation. Fundamental decisions about the roles and responsibilities of process owners, and who is best qualified to execute these roles, are paramount to building a strong process-based governance model. Clear process owner roles offer strong benefits to internal governance. They not only drive how decisions will be made in the future, but also identify and correct potential flaws in the company’s current governance. In many companies, the results include more effective and efficient cross-functional decision making, fewer cross-functional committees, more single-point ownership, and fewer informal channels to challenge and overturn decisions by escalating decisions to senior executives. What is the background required for successful process owners?  A process owner should—

  • Be an executive or senior manager who possesses organizational clout and can command, not just negotiate
  • Typically be the senior-most manager whose areas of responsibility directly intersect most with the process
  • Have a predisposition to oversee and work with the teams within the core business process and have major equity across the functions in the business process
  • Possess a broad understanding of the activities and challenges across the business process, with knowledge of upstream and downstream activities (e.g., suppliers and customers)
  • Have the ability to do what is best for the overall performance of the process and its customers, rather than for just the functions or operations falling within the process.
    In short, a process owner is not necessarily a subject matter or technical expert, a functional specialist, or an process specialist. The table below shows a typical job description for a process owner.
1

Some of the key attributes of individuals occupying this role are…

  1. Broad Experience: As a leader Process Owner have to understand how the pieces fit together. This knowledge is only truly gained through experience by bouncing about from role to role. This in turn requires that they be…
  2. Diggers: Individuals who get things done by going to ground zero, deciphering how things work, and possessing the understanding to make adjustments to capitalize on the situation. Process owners delve into the weeds and absorb the details, because they know this is where true change takes place. Mired in the details, they must also retain a…
  3. Customer Focus: Any innovation effort will be adjusted and redesigned as new information comes to light. On occasion the original strategy may be fatally flawed, requiring major readjustments before it delivers the intended outcome. To recalibrate strategies, key to this role is the ability for the business process owner to be customer focused. Again, this is a mindset best gained on the ground floor connecting with customers. Having such a background provides an awareness of the customer that cannot be taught as effectively in any other way. Dealing with a changing scope also requires process owners be…
  4. Level headed, pragmatic, and fact based: Changing situations allow ambitious individuals to capitalize on the chaos for their own personal gain. Doing so may well limit the benefits captured by an improvement effort. Process owners are the rudder of the organization’s change efforts and need to base improvements on facts and not emotions or political concerns. Bringing strategies in the face of adversity requires a certain level of…
  5. Natural Leadership: Some of the best candidates for business process owner are individuals who just seem to have the knack for getting things done. They plow through resistance and find a way to deliver when others fail. They are capable negotiators and excel at coordinating with other leaders.

How to utilize the strengths of a Process Owner:

  1. Train the Process owner: No employee will contribute for a new initiative without understanding the concepts, realizing the benefits of it. So, train the process owners, so that he realizes the need of it and thinks of the benefits he reaps on.
  2. Involve him from the early stage: He should be involved from the early stages of implementation. He should be a part of meetings discussing the planning of System implementation.
  3. Let him point out the pain area and Project opportunity: The Top Management should consult the process owner in identifying the pain areas and opportunities of improvement. Imposing ideas or projects will lead to resistance and he will tend to be defensive.
  4. Consult him in Team Member Selection: He knows the strengths and availability of his team members. Thus his opinion in team member selection will be beneficial for the process/project and least disturbance to the normal operations.
  5. Utilize his process knowledge: Involve him in the process of root cause analysis and solution identification. Without his support, the changed process cannot be implemented continuously.
  6. Credit him for the entire Success: Publicly appreciate his involvement and support in the success. Also his team members can be rewarded for their commitment and contribution. Top Management can be made as a bonus parameter to encourage the process owner and his team for effective participation.

 If your organization wishes to make process ownership work – and shift management attention to what really matters to customers – then consider the following pitfalls to avoid.

Pitfall #1: The drive on process ownership is NOT top down

If senior leadership are not actively driving process ownership, it’s not likely to result in a greater emphasis on improving the customer experience through enterprise wide process orientation.  In the absence of ongoing leadership support, few such efforts are sustainable.

Pitfall #2: The scope of responsibility of process owners is too narrow

Process ownership needs to have a certain degree of scope to be effective in driving process orientation. Too often, the scope of responsibility of process owners is defined within department boundaries. In this case there is frequently overlap and redundancy between what departmental management and process owners do.

Pitfall #3: The scope of responsibility of process owners is too wide

However, the remit cannot be so wide that the  challenges involved will be so great that the process owner is not likely to succeed. This is especially true if the scope of responsibility of process owners is defined in terms of mega processes such as order to cash, procure to pay, or hire to retire.

Pitfall #4: The job description is too complex

The role needs to be desirable and the responsibilities need to be achievable.  Only a handful of deliverables are needed, with a focus on improved performance through collaboration, customer experience and measurement.

Pitfall #5: If the emphasis on control trumps the focus on collaboration

The entire foundation of process ownership is based on collaboration – NOT control and, frankly, the concept of controlling processes is no longer popular with the rank and file in many organizations. Conversely, there are at least 4 critical success factors involved with shifting management attention to what really matters to customers through process ownership.

Success factor #1: Give it a name that has clout

The label of process ownership needs to be changed to something that is more descriptive and desirable. Instead of “process owner for order to cash” consider “Director – Perfect Order Delivery.” Instead of “process owner – procure to pay” consider “Director – Request to Receipt.”

Success factor #2: Measure what matters to customers

This is the foundational tactic for mitigating the obstacles of perception and complexity. It enables leaders to ask questions around operational performance and creating value for customers. By emphasizing metrics such as perfect order delivery (on-time, complete, error-free), perfect response to inquiries and complaints (first-time-right, complete, error-free), and variance to promise date for new product or service introduction, leaders can raise thought-provoking questions that directly strike to operational performance and require cross-departmental collaboration.

Success factor #3: Establish partnerships

Establishing partnerships is another key tactic that can mitigate key obstacles. Establishing a close and collaborative relationship with the Top Management is arguably the most important of these partnerships for increased process orientation and fundamental to success. Others may advocate major change, but, invariably, the Top Management leads the communication of the case for change and the arbiter in deciding which members of the leadership team need to engage.

Success factor #4: Promote Learning

This is the final critical success factor. By measuring what matters to customers and forging essential partnerships, the leadership team can lead lunch and learn sessions around the performance of critical processes and be front and center in reinforcing the need for cross functional collaboration.

IATF 16949:2016 Clause 5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency

Process effectiveness and efficiency are business terms often used interchangeably or in a general combination. Effectiveness refers to your ability to optimize business strengths in the way you operate. Efficiency refers to your ability to optimize your resources and business activities to generate revenue and profits. Organizations simply cannot ignore the terms ‘efficiency’ and ‘effectiveness’  For increasing productivity as well as improving customer service, both of these are essential. Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.

1

Clause 5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency

Top management must check the processes for making products and the support processes to see if they work well and are efficient. The findings from these reviews must be considered when top management conducts management review.

Clause 5.1.1.2 requires top management to have a method for reviewing all organizational activities that relate to supplying parts to the organization’s customers.  IATF 6949 adds a requirement that top management must regularly review the effectiveness and efficiency of the product realization and support processes. In simple English, that requires top management to ask how well the core business is being managed. Financial measures obviously come to mind. but from the quality perspective, measures of parts per million (ppm) nonconforming at the customer, first-run capability (the percent of product produced without repair operations). scrap, employee turnover, and delivery performance to the schedule are among the appropriate metrics for measuring core business efficiency. The clause also requires not to ensure that the results of process review activities will now be included in management review. Process review activities need to include evaluation methods and, as a result, implement improvements. The results of these steps would be an input to the management review process. Top management is thus performing a review of the process-specific reviews performed by the process owners.

Top management at each site must review process effectiveness and efficiency . This may include:

  • Achievement of continual improvement objectives for identified product realization and support processes
  • Optimization of the interaction of these processes
  • Verification that these processes operate as an effective and efficient network
  • Monitoring cost trends and benchmarking of key processes

Process Effectiveness

Effectiveness is an external measure of performance and indicates how well a Process fulfills the demands of various stakeholders. Simply put, it is “doing the right things.” For example, in educational institutions, effectiveness is measured by teaching students what they need to know. Managers need to make sure that the services or products meet customers’ expectations. When analyzing a company’s processes, effectiveness takes precedence over efficiency. The effectiveness of a process is the measure of how relevant the output is to the desired objective. A truly effective process will make customers happy by providing everything right. That is the right results at the right place time, and cost. Hence, measure process effectiveness from the customers’ goal point of view.

Effectiveness measures the extent to which planned activities (run rate) and planned results (objectives) are achieved? E.g., say you plan to produce and ship 1000 units a day with zero defects.  At the end of the week, the production records showed we achieved our planned activity of 1000 units per day, but fell short on our planned result, as we incurred a 2.5% defect rate and only hit a 90% on-time delivery rate.

Effectiveness can include discussion of current operations and opportunities for improvement. If your business is currently effective, you are using your core strengths and available resources to best serve the marketplace. A for-profit business with a strong customer service staff is effective if it earns healthy revenue by providing a high level of sales and service production. An effective manufacturing firm uses its buildings, equipment, and workflow to produce quality goods. The activities that make you effective now may not contribute to continued effectiveness. Therefore, it is fair to say that effective companies consistently look for opportunities for growth and development. If an emerging market develops that your company can serve, effectiveness means that you conduct research, recognize the needs and interests of the market, develop products and services to match and promote your brands well to the target customer base. Your company’s effectiveness is somewhat relative to the ability of competitors to produce similar business results with the same resources and opportunities.

Process Efficiency

Efficiency is an internal measure of performance for a process that shows how well the process converts inputs into outputs. The more the ratio of outputs to inputs approaches 100 percent, the better the efficiency of the process will be. In simple terms, it is “doing things right” and comes from the proper harnessing of time, cost, and effort. For example, an employee can improve efficiency by developing a daily work schedule, avoiding personal phone calls, and preventing distractions. Process efficiency, on the other hand, acts as a vital factor in determining productivity. It is a measurable concept. Essentially it is the ratio of ‘useful output to total input’. Hence it requires resource optimization (mainly cost and time) along with maximum waste reduction. To understand process efficiency we need to measure process time, cost, and effort needs.

Efficiency is the relationship between results achieved and resources used. Can we produce more units than planned per hour for the set amount of resources? Or can we use fewer resources than planned to produce the units.? Efficiency can relate to the utilization of any resource – machine, labor, material, facilities, utilities, time, etc.    Let us look at a simple example. Say one operator A can produce 100 good units per hour with 2% material scrap on a machine.  Operator B produces 105 good units with only 1% material scrap per hour on the same machine. Clearly, operator B is more efficient in the use of time as well as material, both of which can be measured. Because there are many other resources to be considered, the measurement of efficiency can get fairly complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach involving production, engineering, cost accounting, and other disciplines.

Efficiency generally refers to how well you convert business investments into revenue and profit. One factor in efficiency is cost control. Efficient companies usually only spend money that produces tangible gains in customers, revenue, or profit. Paying competitive wages while motivating employees to produce the highest goods or sales contributes to efficiency. Paying only for product developments that lead to enhanced customer perception of value is another element of cost control and efficiency.

 Productivity relates the output of goods and services of the company to the inputs of all the resources used in the production of goods and services. In other words, it measures how well a company transforms resources into products. Productivity is the combination of efficiency and effectiveness. This means that a company that only attains efficiency or effectiveness is either partially productive or not productive at all. To be productive, a company needs to be efficient and effective at the same time. Relating efficiency and effectiveness overcomes the shortcomings of using either of them alone. If managers focus on efficiency alone, they may jeopardize the competitiveness of their company. For example, mere focus on efficiency ignores the contribution of the activity to customer value creation. Likewise, the exclusive emphasis on effectiveness ignores the cost-effectiveness of the activity. Improving productivity boosts competitiveness by lowering operational costs, using resources better, increasing market share, and increasing profits.

Measuring Process effectiveness and efficiency 

The starting point involves detailed process mapping and creating the block diagram for the said process after discussing in detail with the operations teams and floor walk-through. The block diagram is then fine-tuned to mark the boundaries thus freezing the beginning point and the ending point of the chosen process. Further planning involves marking the source of inputs that go into the said process, identifying the input source as well as the output customers at intermediate and final stages of the process. Detailed examination of the data that is received as input, the data or deliverable that is required to be sent as output from the process would have to be done to ensure every possible detail is captured. At this point, it becomes necessary to examine the input and output data accuracy, errors, frequency, and standardization of the data as well as to record the customer expectations from the process. Once the entire process mapping and overview has been completed and defined, the next logical step would be to tabulate the measurements and targets for the overall process.

  1. Process Effectiveness Measurement
    Effectiveness of a process refers to the usefulness of the process output in relation to the expectations and needs of the Customer. The effectiveness of the process lies in being able to provide the desired output as needed by the Customer at the right time, the right way, and at the right place, and more importantly at the right cost too. The process of setting up process effectiveness measurement begins with outlining the complete Customer expectations and needs detail. These expectations would then be converted into measurable targets and expectations. Lastly, the data collection and measurement methods would need to be outlined. It helps to elaborate a little more on the process effectiveness measurement and the attributes that are used as measurements. In most cases, it is generally seen that the customer expectations and requirements are not defined clearly with specifications in terms of the delivery format, frequency, and so on. In addition, the customer’s expectation of error-free service, customer experience, and quality of service is not defined or understood well enough and is not quantified. Now is the time to examine the customer expectations in detail and establish the criteria for delivery of the said product or service in line with customer expectations. There are several criteria that are used to measure the process effectiveness specifically in relation to the Customer expectations. Some of the popular and useful criteria used in the product as well as service industry include – Product or Service Presentation, Timeliness of Delivery, Accuracy of Service, Reliability of Service or Product, Product usability, Product serviceability, and Customer Service, Responsiveness, etc. Once the criteria for measurement have been established and accepted, the next sequential step would be to formalize the measurement criteria and freeze the formats. Measurement criteria here would include the usage of QC Inspection, Check Sheets, AQ Sampling formats to be used at the Customer end, Customer Inspection and Installation reports or feedback forms, etc. Specific measurement criteria can be set up depending upon the specific business case.
  2. Process Efficiency
    Efficient execution of the process is very important for very many reasons. In most cases, the processes are normally found to contain inefficiencies built over a period of time. First and foremost every customer who is buying a product or a Service expects efficiency of service. Depending upon the nature of the business or the service, the process efficiency can be ascertained. The efficiency of service in a restaurant can be measured in terms of time taken from Order to Delivery of Food and in the case of an Airline; the check-in process efficiency could be of prime importance to gauge service efficiency. Take the case of Sales Order processing; the process efficiency would be of importance when it comes to the calculation of total time taken from the Order to delivery to the end customer. Process efficiency is not only important from the point of view of the external customers alone. Internally too, process efficiency has a bearing on the cost of the operations as well. Internally the process efficiency can be measured using several criteria including but not limited to – Total processing time, Resource utilization per unit of output, Non-Value Added Cost, Non-Value Added Time, Cost of Quality, etc. Measuring the processing time at all stages throws up a lot of factors that are aiding or harming the process efficiency and thus provides ample information to be able to work on process control and improvement. Measurement of process time or cycle time will also throw up non-value-added time as well as activity that can be acted upon for correction. Furthermore, any deficiency in the training or skills of the workers and any delay or inefficiency from the related processes that are supposed to provide the inputs will also show up with the measurement of the cycle time of the process. The efficiency of the process has a direct bearing on the Customer’s expectation and the promise to the Customer as well as to the overall operational cost. Therefore putting process efficiency measurements in place will help bring out the areas and factors that are needed to be controlled, managed, changed, and altered in the process of improving the said process.

Some metrics used for calculating Process efficiency and effectiveness are

Improving Customer Experience & Responsiveness

On-Time Delivery to Commit – This metric is the percentage of time that manufacturing delivers a completed product on the schedule that was committed to customers.

Manufacturing Cycle Time –  Measures the speed or time it takes for manufacturing to produce a given product from the time the order is released to production, to finished goods.

Time to Make Changeovers – Measures the speed or time it takes to switch a manufacturing line or plant from making one product over to making a different product.

Improving Quality

Yield – Indicates a percentage of products that are manufactured correctly and to specifications the first time through the manufacturing process without scrap or rework.

Customer Rejects/ Return Material Authorizations/ Returns – A measure of how many times customers reject products or request returns of products based on receipt of a bad or out of specification product.

Supplier’s Quality Incoming – A measure of the percentage of good quality materials coming into the manufacturing process from a given supplier.

Improving Efficiency

Throughput – Measures how much product is being produced on a machine, line, unit, or plant over a specified period of time.

Capacity Utilization – Indicates how much of the total manufacturing output capacity is being utilized at a given point in time.

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) – This multi-dimensional metric is a multiplier of Availability x Performance x Quality, and it can be used to indicate the overall effectiveness of a piece of production equipment or an entire production line.

Schedule or Production Attainment – A measure of what percentage of time a target level of production is attained within a specified schedule of time.

Reducing Inventory

WIP Inventory/Turns – A commonly used ratio calculation to measure the efficient use of inventory materials. It is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold by the average inventory used to produce those goods.

Ensuring Compliance

Reportable Health and Safety Incidents – A measure of the number of health and safety incidents that were either actual incidents or near misses that were recorded as occurring over a period of time.

Reportable Environmental Incidents – A measure of the number of health and safety incidents that were recorded as occurring over a period of time.

Number of Non-Compliance Events / Year – A measure of the number of times a plant or facility operated outside the guidelines of normal regulatory compliance rules over a one-year period. These non-compliances need to be fully documented as to the specific non-compliance time, reasons, and resolutions.

Reducing Maintenance

Percentage Planned vs. Emergency Maintenance Work Orders – This ratio metric is an indicator of how often scheduled maintenance takes place, versus more disruptive/un-planned maintenance.

Downtime in Proportion to Operating Time – This ratio of downtime to operating time is a direct indicator of asset availability for production.

Increasing Flexibility & Innovation

Rate of New Product Introduction –  Indicates how rapidly new products can be introduced to the marketplace and typically includes a combination of design, development, and manufacturing ramp-up times.

Engineering Change Order Cycle Time – A measure of how rapidly design changes or modifications to existing products can be implemented all the way through documentation processes and volume production.

Reducing Costs & Increasing Profitability

Total Manufacturing Cost per Unit Excluding Materials – This is a measure of all potentially controllable manufacturing costs that go into the production of a given manufactured unit, item, or volume.

Manufacturing Cost as a Percentage of Revenue – A ratio of total manufacturing costs to the overall revenues produced by a manufacturing plant or business unit.

Net Operating Profit – Measures the financial profitability for all investors/shareholders/debt holders, either before or after taxes, for a manufacturing plant or business unit.

Productivity in Revenue per Employee – This is a measure of how much revenue is generated by a plant, business unit, or company, divided by the number of employees.

Average Unit Contribution Margin – This metric is calculated as a ratio of the profit margin that is generated by a manufacturing plant or business unit, divided into a given unit or volume of production.

Return on Assets/Return on Net Assets – A measure of financial performance calculated by dividing the net income from a manufacturing plant or business unit by the value of fixed assets and working capital deployed.

Energy Cost per Unit – A measure of the cost of energy (electricity, steam, oil, gas, etc.) required to produce a specific unit or volume of production.

 Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time – This metric is the duration between the purchase of a manufacturing plant or business unit’s inventory, and the collection of payments/accounts receivable for the sale of products that utilize that inventory – typically measured in days.

EBITDA – This metric acronym stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a calculation of a business unit or company’s earnings, prior to having any interest payments, tax, depreciation, and amortization subtracted for any final accounting of income and expenses. EBITDA is typically used as a top-level indication of the current operational profitability of a business.

Customer Fill Rate/On-Time delivery/Perfect Order Percentage – This metric is the percentage of times that customers receive the entirety of their ordered manufactured goods, to the correct specifications, and delivered at the expected time.

IATF 16949:2016 Clause 5.1.1.1 Corporate responsibility

It’s been over a year since Volkswagen was caught cheating on EPA tests, but the effects of that scandal are still reverberating throughout the automotive industry. The IATF 16949 standard has been revised by the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) based on industry feedback and engagement. This is the first time that ethics language has been included in an automotive quality standard. It’s significant because it gives us an opportunity to verify where the supply base stands on several core ethics policies. The new IATF 16949 standard states that certified organizations must implement basic corporate responsibility policies, such as anti-bribery policies, an employee code of conduct, and an ethics escalation (whistle-blower) policy. Nine North American and European OEMs and five national automotive supplier associations have agreed to include corporate responsibility requirements in the new quality standard. The language is basic, but it clearly requires automotive sites worldwide to provide documentation that they have established an employee behavioral expectation code, implemented a formal process to report code violations, and published an anti-bribery policy. There are no incremental costs to suppliers or OEMs to capture this corporate responsibility data. By late 2018, more than 65,000 supplier sites that are certified to the new standard—primarily Tier One and Tier Two direct-part manufacturers—must be physically audited and re-certified by an approved IATF third-party certification body. Non-compliance could result in the suspension of a supplier’s quality certification and limitations to accessing new business opportunities. Fortunately, the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), which oversees the creation of these global standards, is offering a free knowledge assessment tool so that industry professionals can identify gaps in their understanding of the Group’s Global Guidance Principles and address them before being audited.

IATF 16949:2016  5.1.1.1 Corporate responsibility

The organization needs to make and follow rules about being responsible. This includes having policies to stop bribery, guidelines for how employees should behave, and a way for people to report problems, like a whistle-blowing policy.

Explanation:

To be successful today, the automotive industry and its supply chain partners must contend with heightened expectations from a range of stakeholders on complex corporate responsibility issues:
• A plethora of governmental regulations affect the use and management of chemicals in the production process. The organization must keep abreast of existing and emerging regulations on the use and management of chemicals in the production process and provide an assessment of their impact.
• A growing number of regions, countries, and non-governmental organizations throughout the world require companies to report greenhouse gas emissions, which also factor into financial firms’ assessments, stockholder decisions, and customer perceptions. This is an important first step in environmental sustainability. OEMs and suppliers are required to calculate and report emissions from the supply base in a consistent and accurate manner and creating cost savings for the organization. The lessons learned and processes implemented for GHGs will set a foundation for other elements of environmental sustainability (i.e., water, wastes).
• The increased globalization of automotive production makes understanding and managing the impact of working conditions on business a greater challenge. Understanding and managing the impacts of the working conditions of business has become a greater challenge with the increased globalization of automotive production, and developing responsible working conditions begins with having a shared understanding of the key issues(child labor, forced labor, freedom of association, harassment and discrimination, health and safety, wages and benefits, and working hours.) up and down the supply chain.

  1. Business Ethics
    The basis for sustainable and successful business activity is to have integrity and transparent business practices. Companies are expected to operate honestly and equitably throughout the supply chain in accordance with local law, including those laws pertaining to:
    • Anti-Corruption
    • Anti-competitive Business Practices
    • Protection of Intellectual Property
    • Respect for Company and Personal Data
    • Export Controls
    • Conflicts of Interest
  2. Environmental Standards
    Companies are expected to pursue effective environmental protection throughout the supply chain in order to reduce the environmental footprint of our products throughout their life-cycle. All products manufactured within the supply chain and the applied materials and substances used in the process are expected to meet environmental standards for design, development, distribution, use, disposal, or recycling. Such a comprehensive approach includes but is not limited to:
    • Reducing energy and water consumption
    • Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
    • Increasing use of renewable energies
    • Enhancing appropriate waste management
    • Training of employees
    Businesses are expected to support a proactive approach to environmental challenges and encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.
  3. Working Conditions and Human Rights
    1. Child Labor and Young Workers
      Child labor should not be tolerated and the age of employment must be in accordance with local labor law.
    2. Wages and Benefits
      Compensation and benefits should be competitive and comply with applicable local laws, including those relating to minimum wages, overtime compensation, and legally mandated benefits.
    3. Working Hours
      Working hours, including overtime, should comply with applicable local laws regulating hours of work.
    4. Forced Labor
      Any form of forced or compulsory labor, including human trafficking, should not be tolerated.
    5. Freedom of Association
      Workers should be able to communicate openly with management regarding working conditions without fear of reprisal, intimidation, or harassment. Workers should have the right to associate freely, to join or not join labor unions, seek representation, and join workers’ councils in accordance with local laws.
    6. Health and Safety
      Workers should have a safe and healthy working environment that meets or exceeds applicable standards for safety and occupational health.
    7. Harassment and Discrimination
      Harassment or discrimination against employees in any form is not acceptable.

Anti Bribery Policy

Ethical business practices are not only necessary for preserving reputability and improving business overall, but also for adhering to the law. Conducting bribery or corrupt activities won’t just get you a slap on the wrist; you could be heavily fined or potentially put behind bars. Bribery includes the act of offering, giving, promising, asking, agreeing, receiving, or soliciting something of value for the purpose of influencing action. But being involved in bribery is not just limited to the act of offering a bribe: if you are on the receiving end and accept it, you are also breaking the law.  Anti Bribery  Policies should aim to:

  • Demonstrate its understanding of anti-bribery law.
  • Emphasise that the company has zero-tolerance for bribery.
  • Detail whom the policy applies to.
  • Detail the company and employees’ responsibilities.
  • Reduce and control bribery risks.
  • Provide rules about accepting gifts.
  • Provide guidance on how business should be conducted so to prevent bribery.
  • Provide direction on how to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • Include information about monitoring and reviewing the policy.
  • An anti-bribery policy demonstrates a company’s commitment to preventing bribery and corrupt activities, and all staff should be instructed to familiarise themselves with the information it contains.

Having this policy in place ensures that everyone knows what to do in regards to preventing bribery, which minimizes the risks of bribery and corruption occurring in your business and therefore protects your company from facing any issues with the law.

Six Principles to prevent Bribery in the organization

The Organization having Anti- Bribery policy in place and wishing to prevent bribery from being committed on their behalf should follow the following Six principles.  Commentary and guidance on what procedures the application of the principles may produce accompany each principle. These principles are not prescriptive. They are intended to be flexible and outcome focussed, allowing for the huge variety of circumstances that organizations find themselves in. Small organizations will, for example, face different challenges to those faced by large multi-national enterprises. Accordingly, the detail of how organizations might apply these principles, taken as a whole, will vary, but the outcome should always be robust and effective anti-bribery procedures. To set out in more detail below, bribery prevention procedures should be proportionate to risk.

Principle 1: Proportionate procedures

An Organisation’s procedures to prevent bribery by persons associated with it are proportionate to the bribery risks it faces and to the nature, scale, and complexity of the organization’s activities. They are also clear, practical, accessible, effectively implemented, and enforced.
Commentary
The term ‘procedures’ is used to embrace both bribery prevention policies and the procedures which implement them. Policies articulate the organization’s anti-bribery stance, show how it will be maintained, and help to create an anti-bribery culture. They are therefore a necessary measure in the prevention of bribery, but they will not achieve that objective unless they are properly implemented. Adequate bribery prevention procedures ought to be proportionate to the bribery risks that the organization faces. An initial assessment of risk across the organization is therefore a necessary first step. To a certain extent, the level of risk will be linked to the size of the organization and the nature and complexity of its business, but size will not be the only determining factor. Some small organizations can face quite significant risks and will need more extensive procedures than their counterparts facing limited risks. However, small organizations are unlikely to need procedures that are as extensive as those of a large multi-national organization. For example, a very small business may be able to rely heavily on periodic oral briefings to communicate its policies while a large one may need to rely on extensive written communication. The level of risk that organizations face will also vary with the type and nature of the persons associated with it. For example, an organization that properly assesses that there is no risk of bribery on the part of one of its associated persons will accordingly require nothing in the way of procedures to prevent bribery in the context of that relationship. By the same token, the bribery risks associated with reliance on a third party agent representing a commercial organization in negotiations with foreign public officials may be assessed as significant and accordingly require much more in the way of procedures to mitigate those risks. Organizations are likely to need to select procedures to cover a broad range of risks but any consideration by a court in an individual case of the adequacy of procedures is likely necessary to focus on those procedures designed to prevent bribery on the part of the associated person committing the offence in question. Bribery prevention procedures may be stand-alone or form part of wider guidance, for example on recruitment or on managing a tender process in public procurement. Whatever the chosen model, the procedures should seek to ensure there is a practical and realistic means of achieving the organization’s stated anti-bribery policy objectives across all of the organization’s functions. Applying these procedures retrospectively to existing associated persons is more difficult, but this should be done over time, adopting a risk-based approach and with due allowance for what is practicable and the level of control over existing arrangements.

Procedures
Organizations’ bribery prevention policies are likely to include certain common elements. As an indicative and not exhaustive list, an organization may wish to cover in its policies

  • its commitment to bribery prevention
  • its general approach to mitigation of specific bribery risks, such as those arising from the conduct of intermediaries and agents, or those associated with hospitality and promotional expenditure, facilitation payments, or political and charitable donations or contributions;
  • an overview of its strategy to implement its bribery prevention policies.

The procedures put in place to implement an organization’s bribery prevention policies should be designed to mitigate identified risks as well as to prevent deliberate unethical conduct on the part of associated persons. The following is an indicative and not exhaustive list of the topics that bribery prevention procedures might embrace depending on the particular risks faced:

  • The involvement of the organization’s top-level management.
  • Risk assessment procedures
  •  Due diligence of existing or prospective associated persons
  • The provision of gifts, hospitality, and promotional expenditure; charitable and political donations; or demands for facilitation payments.
  • Direct and indirect employment, including recruitment, terms, and conditions, disciplinary action, and remuneration.
  • Governance of business relationships with all other associated persons including pre and post-contractual agreements
  • Financial and commercial controls such as adequate bookkeeping, auditing, and approval of expenditure
  • Transparency of transactions and disclosure of information.
  • Decision makings, such as delegation of authority procedures, separation of functions, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest
  • Enforcement, detailing discipline processes and sanctions for breaches of the organization’s anti-bribery rules.
  • The reporting of bribery including ‘speak up’ or ‘whistle blowing’ procedures
  • The detail of the process by which the organization plans to implement its bribery prevention procedures, for example, how its policy will be applied to individual projects and to different parts of the organization.
  • The communication of the organization’s policies and procedures, and training in their application
  • The monitoring, review, and evaluation of bribery prevention procedures

Principle 2: Top-level commitment

The top-level management (be it a board of directors, the owners, or any other equivalent body or person) are committed to preventing bribery by persons associated with it. They foster a culture within the organization in which bribery is never acceptable.

Commentary
Those at the top of an organization are in the best position to foster a culture of integrity where bribery is unacceptable. The purpose of this principle is to encourage the involvement of top-level management in the determination of bribery prevention procedures. It is also to encourage top-level involvement in any key decision-making relating to bribery risk where that is appropriate for the organization’s management structure.
Procedures
Whatever the size, structure, or market of a commercial organization, top-level management commitment to bribery prevention is likely to include (1) communication of the organization’s anti-bribery stance, and (2) an appropriate degree of involvement in developing bribery prevention procedures.

Internal and external communication of the commitment to zero tolerance to bribery. This could take a variety of forms. A formal statement appropriately communicated can be very effective in establishing an anti-bribery culture within an organization. Communication might be tailored to different audiences. The statement would probably need to be drawn to people’s attention on a periodic basis and could be generally available, for example on an organization’s intranet and/or internet site. Effective formal statements that demonstrate top-level commitment are likely to include:

  • a commitment to carry out business fairly, honestly, and openly
  • a commitment to zero tolerance towards bribery• the consequences of breaching the policy for employees and managers
  • for other associated persons the consequences of breaching contractual provisions relating to bribery prevention (this could include a reference to avoiding doing business with others who do not commit to doing business without bribery as a ‘best practice’ objective
  • articulation of the business benefits of rejecting bribery (reputational, customer, and business partner confidence)
  • reference to the range of bribery prevention procedures the commercial organization has or is putting in place, including any protection and procedures for confidential reporting of bribery (whistle-blowing)
  • key individuals and departments involved in the development and implementation of the organization’s bribery prevention procedures
  • reference to the organization’s involvement in any collective action against bribery in, for example, the same business sector.

Top-level involvement in bribery prevention
Effective leadership in bribery prevention will take a variety of forms appropriate for and proportionate to the organization’s size, management structure, and circumstances. In smaller organizations, a proportionate response may require top-level managers to be personally involved in initiating, developing, and implementing bribery prevention procedures and bribery critical decision making. In a large multi-national organization the board should be responsible for setting bribery prevention policies, tasking management to design, operate, and monitor bribery prevention procedures, and keeping these policies and procedures under regular review. But whatever the appropriate model, top-level engagement is likely to reflect the following elements:

  • Selection and training of senior managers to lead anti-bribery work where appropriate.
  • Leadership on key measures such as a code of conduct.
  • Endorsement of all bribery prevention-related publications.
  • Leadership in awareness-raising and encouraging transparent dialogue throughout the organization so as to seek to ensure effective dissemination of anti-bribery policies and procedures to employees, subsidiaries, and associated persons, etc.
  • Engagement with relevant associated persons and external bodies, such as sectoral organizations and the media, to help articulate the organization’s policies.
  • Specific involvement in high profile and critical decision making where appropriate
  • Assurance of risk assessment.
  • General oversight of breaches of procedures and the provision of feedback to the board or equivalent, where appropriate, on levels of compliance.

Principle 3: Risk Assessment

The commercial organization assesses the nature and extent of its exposure to potential external and internal risks of bribery on its behalf by persons associated with it. The assessment is periodic, informed, and documented.

Commentary

For organizations, this principle will manifest itself as part of a general risk assessment carried out in clause 4 in relation to business objectives.  The purpose of this principle is to promote the adoption of risk assessment procedures that are proportionate to the organization’s size and structure and to the nature, scale, and location of its activities. But whatever approach has adopted the fuller the understanding of the bribery risks an organization faces the more effective its efforts to prevent bribery are likely to be. Some aspects of risk assessment involve procedures that fall within the generally accepted meaning of the term ‘due diligence.

Procedures

Risk assessment procedures that enable the organization accurately to identify and prioritize the risks it faces will, whatever its size, activities, customers, or markets, usually reflect a few basic characteristics. These are

  • Oversight of the risk assessment by top-level management.
  • Appropriate resourcing – this should reflect the scale of the organization’s business and the need to identify and prioritize all relevant risks
  • Identification of the internal and external information sources that will enable risk to be assessed and reviewed.
  • Due diligence inquiries
  • Accurate and appropriate documentation of the risk assessment and its conclusions.

As a commercial organization’s business evolves, so will the bribery risks it faces and hence so should its risk assessment. For example, the risk assessment that applies to an organization’s domestic operations might not apply when it enters a new market in a part of the world in which it has not done business before

Commonly encountered risks

Commonly encountered external risks can be categorized into five broad groups – country, sectoral, transaction, business opportunity, and business partnership:

  1. Country risk: this is evidenced by perceived high levels of corruption, an absence of effectively implemented anti-bribery legislation, and a failure of the foreign government, media, local business community, and civil society effectively to promote transparent procurement and investment policies.
  2. Sectoral risk: some sectors are at higher risk than others. Higher-risk sectors include the extractive industries and the large-scale infrastructure sector.
  3. Transaction risk: certain types of transactions give rise to higher risks, for example, charitable or political contributions, licenses and permits, and transactions relating to public procurement.
  4.  Business opportunity risk: such risks might arise in high-value projects or with projects involving many contractors or intermediaries; or with projects which are not apparently undertaken at market prices, or which do not have a clear legitimate objective.
  5. Business partnership risk: certain relationships may involve higher risk, for example, the use of intermediaries in transactions with foreign public officials; consortia or joint venture partners; and relationships with politically exposed persons where the proposed business relationship involves, or is linked to, a prominent public official.

 An assessment of external bribery risks is intended to help decide how those risks can be mitigated by procedures governing the relevant operations or business relationships, but a bribery risk assessment should also examine the extent to which internal structures or procedures may themselves add to the level of risk. Commonly encountered internal factors may include

  • deficiencies in employee training, skills, and knowledge
  • bonus culture that rewards excessive risk-taking
  •  lack of clarity in the organization’s policies on, and procedures for, hospitality and promotional expenditure, and political or charitable contributions
  • lack of clear financial controls
  • lack of a clear anti-bribery message from the top-level management.

Principle 4: Due diligence

The organization applies due diligence procedures, taking a proportionate and risk-based approach, in respect of persons who perform or will perform services for or on behalf of the organization, in order to mitigate identified bribery risks.

Commentary

Due diligence is firmly established as an element of corporate good governance and it is envisaged that due diligence related to bribery prevention will often form part of a wider due diligence framework. Due diligence procedures are both a form of bribery risk assessment and a means of mitigating risk. By way of illustration, an organization may identify risks that as a general proposition attach to doing business in reliance upon local third-party intermediaries. Due diligence of specific prospective third-party intermediaries could significantly mitigate these risks. The significance of the role of due diligence in bribery risk mitigation justifies its inclusion here as a Principle in its own right. The purpose of this Principle is to encourage organizations to put in place due diligence procedures that adequately inform the application of proportionate measures designed to prevent persons associated with them from bribing on their behalf.

Procedures

As this guidance emphasizes throughout, due diligence procedures should be proportionate to the identified risk. They can also be undertaken internally or by external consultants. A person ‘associated with an organization includes any person performing services for a commercial organization. The scope of this definition is broad and can embrace a wide range of business relationships. But the appropriate level of due diligence to prevent bribery will vary enormously depending on the risks arising from the particular relationship. So, for example, the appropriate level of due diligence required by an organization when contracting for the performance of information technology services may be low, to reflect low risks of bribery on its behalf. In contrast, an organization that is selecting an intermediary to assist in establishing a business in foreign markets will typically require a much higher level of due diligence to mitigate the risks of bribery on its behalf. Organizations will need to take considerable care in entering into certain business relationships, due to the particular circumstances in which the relationships come into existence. An example is where local law or convention dictates the use of local agents in circumstances where it may be difficult for an organization to extricate itself from a business relationship once established. The importance of thorough due diligence and risk mitigation prior to any commitment is paramount in such circumstances. Another relationship that carries particularly important due diligence implications is a merger of organizations or an acquisition of one by another. ‘Due diligence’  should be conducted using a risk-based approach. For example, in lower-risk situations, organizations may decide that there is no need to conduct much in the way of due diligence. In higher-risk situations, due diligence may include conducting direct interrogative inquiries, indirect investigations, or general research on proposed associated persons. Appraisal and continued monitoring of recruited or engaged ‘associated’ persons may also be required, proportionate to the identified risks. Generally, more information is likely to be required from prospective and existing associated persons that are incorporated (e.g. companies) than from individuals. This is because on a basic level more individuals are likely to be involved in the performance of services by a company and the exact nature of the roles of such individuals or other connected bodies may not be immediately obvious. Accordingly, due diligence may involve direct requests for details on the background, expertise, and business experience, of relevant individuals. This information can then be verified through research and the following up of references, etc. An organization’s employees are presumed to be persons associated with the organization for the purposes of the Bribery Act. The organization may wish, therefore, to incorporate in its recruitment and human resources procedures an appropriate level of due diligence to mitigate the risks of bribery being undertaken by employees which are proportionate to the risk associated with the post in question. Due diligence is unlikely to be needed in relation to lower-risk posts.

Principle 5: Communication (including training)

The organization seeks to ensure that its bribery prevention policies and procedures are embedded and understood throughout the organization through internal and external communication, including training, that is proportionate to the risks it faces.

Commentary

Communication and training deter bribery by associated persons by enhancing awareness and understanding of a commercial organization’s procedures and to the organization’s commitment to their proper application. Making information available assists in more effective monitoring, evaluation, and review of bribery prevention procedures. Training provides the knowledge and skills needed to employ the organization’s procedures and deal with any bribery-related problems or issues that may arise.

Procedures for Communication

  1. The content, language, and tone of communications for internal consumption may vary from that for external use in response to the different relationship the audience has with the commercial organization. The nature of communication will vary enormously between commercial organizations in accordance with the different bribery risks faced, the size of the organization, and the scale and nature of its activities.
  2. Internal communications should convey the ‘tone from the top’ but are also likely to focus on the implementation of the organization’s policies and procedures and the implications for employees. Such communication includes policies on particular areas such as decision making, financial control, hospitality, and promotional expenditure, facilitation payments, training, charitable and political donations and penalties for breach of rules, and the articulation of management roles at different levels. Another important aspect of internal communications is the establishment of a secure, confidential, and accessible means for internal or external parties to raise concerns about bribery on the part of associated persons, to provide suggestions for improvement of bribery prevention procedures and controls, and for requesting advice. These so-called ‘speak up’ procedures can amount to a very helpful management tool for commercial organizations with diverse operations that may be in many countries. If these procedures are to be effective there must be adequate protection for those reporting concerns.
  3.  External communication of bribery prevention policies through a statement or codes of conduct, for example, can reassure existing and prospective associated persons and can act as a deterrent to those intending to bribe on a commercial organization’s behalf. Such communications can include information on bribery prevention procedures and controls, sanctions, results of internal surveys, rules governing recruitment, procurement, and tendering. An organization may consider it proportionate and appropriate to communicate its anti-bribery policies and commitment to them to a wider audience, such as other organizations in its sector and to sectoral organizations that would fall outside the scope of the range of its associated persons, or to the general public.

Procedure for Training

Like all procedures training should be proportionate to risk but some training is likely to be effective in firmly establishing an anti-bribery culture whatever the level of risk. Training may take the form of education and awareness-raising about the threats posed by bribery in general and in the sector or areas in which the organization operates in particular, and the various ways it is being addressed. General training could be mandatory for new employees or for agents (on a weighted risk basis) as part of an induction process, but it should also be tailored to the specific risks associated with specific posts. Consideration should also be given to tailoring training to the special needs of those involved in any ‘speak up’ procedures, and higher risk functions such as purchasing, contracting, distribution and marketing, and working in high-risk countries. Effective training is continuous, and regularly monitored and evaluated. It may be appropriate to require associated persons to undergo training. This will be particularly relevant for high-risk associated persons. In any event, organizations may wish to encourage associated persons to adopt bribery prevention training. Nowadays there are many different training formats available in addition to the traditional classroom or seminar formats, such as e-learning and other web-based tools. But whatever the format, the training ought to achieve its objective of ensuring that those participating in it develop a firm understanding of what the relevant policies and procedures mean in practice for them.

Principle 6: Monitoring and review

The organization monitors and reviews procedures designed to prevent bribery by persons associated with it and makes improvements where necessary.

Commentary

The bribery risks that the organization faces may change over time, as may the nature and scale of its activities, so the procedures required to mitigate those risks are also likely to change. Organizations will therefore wish to consider how to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their bribery prevention procedures and adapt them where necessary. In addition to regular monitoring, an organization might want to review its processes in response to other stimuli, for example, governmental changes in countries in which they operate, an incident of bribery, or negative press reports.

Procedures

There is a wide range of internal and external review mechanisms that organizations could consider using. Systems set up to deter, detect and investigate bribery, and monitor the ethical quality of transactions, such as internal financial control mechanisms, will help provide insight into the effectiveness of procedures designed to prevent bribery. Staff surveys, questionnaires, and feedback from training can also provide an important source of information on the effectiveness and a means by which employees and other associated persons can inform the continuing improvement of anti-bribery policies. Organizations could also consider formal periodic reviews and reports for top-level management. Organizations could also draw on information on other organizations’ practices, for example, relevant trade bodies or regulators might highlight examples of good or bad practices in their publications. In addition, organizations might wish to consider seeking some form of external verification or assurance of the effectiveness of anti-bribery procedures. Some organizations may be able to apply for certified compliance with one of the independently-verified anti-bribery standards maintained by industrial sector associations or multilateral bodies. However, such certification may not necessarily mean that a commercial organization’s bribery prevention procedures are ‘adequate’ for all purposes where an offense under section 7 of the Bribery Act could be charged.

Example of Template of Anti Bribery policy

1. What does your policy cover?

1.1 This anti-bribery policy exists to set out the responsibilities o[f [COMPANY Name] and those who work for us in regards to observing and upholding our zero-tolerance position on bribery and corruption.
1.2 It also exists to act as a source of information and guidance for those working for [COMPANY NAME] . It helps them recognise and deal with bribery and corruption issues, as well as understand their responsibilities.

2. Policy statement

2.1 [COMPANY NAME] is committed to conducting business in an ethical and honest manner and is committed to implementing and enforcing systems that ensure bribery is prevented. [COMPANY NAME] has zero-tolerance for bribery and corrupt activities. We are committed to acting professionally, fairly, and with integrity in all business dealings and relationships, wherever in the country we operate.
2.2 [COMPANY NAME] will constantly uphold all laws relating to anti-bribery and corruption in all the jurisdictions in which we operate. We are bound by the laws of India, including the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, in regards to our conduct both at home and abroad.
2.3 [COMPANY NAME] recognizes that bribery and corruption are punishable by imprisonment and a fine. If our company is discovered to have taken part in corrupt activities, we may be subjected to a fine, be excluded from tendering for public contracts, and face serious damage to our reputation. It is with this in mind that we commit to preventing bribery and corruption in our business and take our legal responsibilities seriously.

3. Who is covered by the policy?

3.1 This anti-bribery policy applies to all employees (whether temporary, fixed-term, or permanent), consultants, contractors, trainees, seconded staff, home workers, casual workers, agency staff, volunteers, interns, agents, sponsors, or any other person or persons associated with us (including third parties), or any of our subsidiaries or their employees, no matter where they are located (within or outside of India). The policy also applies to Officers, Trustees, Board, and/or Committee members at any level.
3.2 In the context of this policy, third-party refers to any individual or organization our company meets and works with. It refers to actual and potential clients, customers, suppliers, distributors, business contacts, agents, advisers, and government and public bodies – this includes their advisors, representatives and officials, politicians, and public parties.
3.3 Any arrangements our company makes with a third party are subject to clear contractual terms, including specific provisions that require the third party to comply with minimum standards and procedures relating to anti-bribery and corruption.

4. Definition of bribery

4.1 Bribery refers to the act of offering, giving, promising, asking, agreeing, receiving, accepting, or soliciting something of value or of an advantage so as to induce or influence an action or decision.
4.2 A bribe refers to any inducement, reward, or object/item of value offered to another individual in order to gain commercial, contractual, regulatory, or personal advantage.
4.3 Bribery is not limited to the act of offering a bribe. If an individual is on the receiving end of a bribe and they accept it, they are also breaking the law.
4.4 Bribery is illegal. Employees must not engage in any form of bribery, whether it be directly, passively (as described above), or through a third party (such as an agent or distributor). They must not bribe a foreign public official anywhere in the world. They must not accept bribes to any degree and if they are uncertain about whether something is a bribe or a gift or act of hospitality, they must seek further advice from the company’s compliance manager.

5. What is and what is NOT acceptable

5.1 This section of the policy refers to the following areas:
• Gifts and hospitality.
• Facilitation payments.
• Political contributions.
• Charitable contributions.
5.2 Gifts and hospitality
[COMPANY NAME] accepts normal and appropriate gestures of hospitality and goodwill (whether given to/received from third parties) so long as the giving or receiving of gifts meets the following requirements:
a. It is not made with the intention of influencing the party to whom it is being given, to obtain or reward the retention of a business or a business advantage, or as an explicit or implicit exchange for favors or benefits.
b. It is not made with the suggestion that a return favor is expected.
c. It is in compliance with local law.
d. It is given in the name of the company, not in an individual’s name.
e. It does not include cash or a cash equivalent (e.g. a voucher or gift certificate).
f. It is appropriate for the circumstances (e.g. giving small gifts around Dipawali / Christmas or as a small thank you to a company for helping with a large project upon completion).
g. It is of an appropriate type and value and given at an appropriate time, taking into account the reason for the gift.
h. It is given/received openly, not secretly.
i. It is not selectively given to a key, influential person, clearly with the intention of directly influencing them.
j. It is not above a certain excessive value, as pre-determined by the company’s compliance manager (usually in excess of Rs1000).
k. It is not offered to, or accepted from, a government official or representative or politician or political party, without the prior approval of the company’s compliance manager.
5.3 Where it is inappropriate to decline the offer of a gift (i.e. when meeting with an individual of a certain religion/culture who may take offense), the gift may be accepted so long as it is declared to the compliance manager, who will assess the circumstances.
5.4 [COMPANY NAME] recognizes that the practice of giving and receiving business gifts varies between countries, regions, cultures, and religions, so definitions of what is acceptable and not acceptable will inevitably differ for each.
5.5 As good practice, gifts that are given and received should always be disclosed to the compliance manager. Gifts from suppliers should always be disclosed.
5.6 The intention behind a gift being given/received should always be considered. If there is any uncertainty, the advice of the compliance manager should be sought.
5.7 Facilitation Payments and Kickbacks
[COMPANY NAME] does not accept and will not make any form of facilitation payments of any nature. We recognize that facilitation payments are a form of bribery that involves expediting or facilitating the performance of a public official for a routine governmental action. We recognize that they tend to be made by low-level officials with the intention of securing or speeding up the performance of a certain duty or action.
5.8 [COMPANY NAME] does not allow kickbacks to be made or accepted. We recognize that kickbacks are typically made in exchange for a business favor or advantage.
5.9 [COMPANY NAME] recognizes that, despite our strict policy on facilitation payments and kickbacks, employees may face a situation where avoiding a facilitation payment or kickback may put their/their family’s personal security at risk. Under these circumstances, the following steps must be taken:
a. Keep any amount to the minimum.
b. Ask for a receipt, detailing the amount and reason for the payment.
c. Create a record concerning the payment.
d. Report this incident to your line manager.
5.10 Political Contributions
[COMPANY NAME] will not make donations, whether in cash, kind, or by any other means, to support any political parties or candidates. We recognize this may be perceived as an attempt to gain an improper business advantage.
5.11 Charitable Contributions
[COMPANY NAME] accepts (and indeed encourages) the act of donating to charities – whether through services, knowledge, time, or direct financial contributions (cash or otherwise) – and agrees to disclose all charitable contributions it makes.
5.12 Employees must be careful to ensure that charitable contributions are not used to facilitate and conceal acts of bribery.
5.13 We will ensure that all charitable donations made are legal and ethical under local laws and practices and that donations are not offered/made without the approval of the compliance manager.

6. Employee Responsibilities

6.1 As an employee of [COMPANY NAME], you must ensure that you read, understand, and comply with the information contained within this policy, and with any training or other anti-bribery and corruption information you are given.
6.2 All employees and those under our control are equally responsible for the prevention, detection, and reporting of bribery and other forms of corruption. They are required to avoid any activities that could lead to, or imply, a breach of this anti-bribery policy.
6.3 If you have reason to believe or suspect that an instance of bribery or corruption has occurred or will occur in the future that breaches this policy, you must notify the compliance manager.
6.4 If any employee breaches this policy, they will face disciplinary action and could face dismissal for gross misconduct. [COMPANY NAME] has the right to terminate a contractual relationship with an employee if they breach this anti-bribery policy.

7. What happens if I need to raise a concern?

7.1 This section of the policy covers 3 areas:
a. How to raise a concern.
b. What to do if you are a victim of bribery or corruption.
c. Protection.
7.2 How to raise a concern
If you suspect that there is an instance of bribery or corrupt activities occurring in relation to [COMPANY NAME], you are encouraged to raise your concerns at as early a stage as possible. If you’re uncertain about whether a certain action or behavior can be considered bribery or corruption, you should speak to your line manager, the compliance manager, the director, or the Head of Governance and Legal.
7.3 [COMPANY NAME] will familiarise all employees with its whistleblowing procedures so employees can vocalize their concerns swiftly and confidentially.
7.4 What to do if you are a victim of bribery or corruption
You must tell your compliance manager as soon as possible if you are offered a bribe by anyone if you are asked to make one, if you suspect that you may be bribed or asked to make a bribe in the near future, or if you have reason to believe that you are a victim of
another corrupt activity.
7.5 Protection
If you refuse to accept or offer a bribe or you report a concern relating to potential act(s) of bribery or corruption, [COMPANY NAME] understands that you may feel worried about potential repercussions. [COMPANY NAME] will support anyone who raises concerns in good faith under this policy, even if the investigation finds that they were mistaken.
7.6 [COMPANY NAME] will ensure that no one suffers any detrimental treatment as a result of refusing to accept or offer a bribe or other corrupt activities or because they reported a concern relating to potential act(s) of bribery or corruption.
7.7 Detrimental treatment refers to dismissal, disciplinary action, treats, or unfavorable treatment in relation to the concern the individual raised.
7.8 If you have reason to believe you’ve been subjected to unjust treatment as a result of a concern or refusal to accept a bribe, you should inform your line manager or the compliance manager immediately.

8. Training and communication

8.1 [COMPANY NAME] will provide training on this policy as part of the induction process for all new employees. Employees will also receive regular, relevant training on how to adhere to this policy, and will be asked annually to formally accept that they will comply
with this policy.
8.2 [COMPANY NAME] ’s anti-bribery and corruption policy and zero-tolerance attitude will be clearly communicated to all suppliers, contractors, business partners, and any third-parties at the outset of business relations, and as appropriate thereafter.
8.3 [COMPANY NAME] will provide relevant anti-bribery and corruption training to employees etc. where we feel their knowledge of how to comply with the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 needs to be enhanced. As a good practice, all businesses should provide their employees with anti-bribery training where there is a potential risk of facing bribery or corruption during work activities.

9. Record keeping

9.1 [COMPANY NAME] will keep detailed and accurate financial records and will have appropriate internal controls in place to act as evidence for all payments made. We will declare and keep a written record of the amount and reason for hospitality or gifts accepted and given, and understand that gifts and acts of hospitality are subject to managerial review.

10. Monitoring and reviewing

10.1 [COMPANY NAME] ’s compliance manager is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of this policy and will review the implementation of it on a regular basis. They will assess its suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.
10.2 Internal control systems and procedures designed to prevent bribery and corruption are subject to regular audits to ensure that they are effective in practice.
10.3 Any need for improvements will be applied as soon as possible. Employees are encouraged to offer their feedback on this policy if they have any suggestions for how it may be improved. Feedback of this nature should be addressed to the compliance manager.
10.4 This policy does not form part of an employee’s contract of employment and [COMPANY NAME] may amend it at any time so to improve its effectiveness at combating bribery and corruption.

—————————End of example————————————— 

Employee’s Code of Conduct

A code of conduct is a set of rules outlining the social norms and religious rules and responsibilities of, or proper practices for, an individual, party, or organization and can be defined as “Principles, values, standards, or rules of behavior that guide the decisions, procedures, and systems of an organization in a way that (a) contributes to the welfare of its key stakeholders, and (b) respects the rights of all constituents affected by its operations.

A common code of conduct is written for employees of a company, which protects the business and informs the employees of the company’s expectations. It is ideal for even the smallest of companies to form a document containing important information on expectations for employees. The document does not need to be complex or have elaborate policies, but the file needs a simple basis of what the company expects from each employee. A Code of Conduct can be an important step in establishing an inclusive culture, but it is not a comprehensive solution on its own. An ethical culture is created by the organization’s leaders who manifest their ethics in their attitudes and behavior.] Studies of codes of conduct in the private sector show that their effective implementation must be part of a learning process that requires training, consistent enforcement, and continuous measurement/improvement. Simply requiring members to read the code is not enough to ensure that they understand it and will remember its contents. The proof of effectiveness is when employees/members feel comfortable enough to voice concerns and believe that the organization will respond with the appropriate action. There is no standard code of ethics, and broad guidelines are given which can be adapted according to the organizational culture and business requirement. Each organization’s Ethics & Compliance department is required to prepare a written Code of Conduct and implement the same within the organization. The main step has been mentioned with a brief narration and key activities required:

  1.  Mandate & commitment from top management: The Code of Conduct defines the core values of the organization thus impacting the organization’s culture. It also has an impact on the reputation of the organization as it specifies the organization’s stance towards corporate social responsibility. The involvement of senior management is a must to provide direction, funding, and resources. Obtain a formal commitment from the management and board of directors to establish the Code of Conduct. Approval for budgets for development, implementation, and regular monitoring is required. Approval for staffing the department and establishing the reporting lines is a need.
  2. Preparation of the policy document: The main policy document contains the values of the organization, management commitment to the same, details of the ethics program, and the monitoring process. Additionally, all supporting policies are mentioned. For example, if the code specifies fair and just treatment for employees, there should be additional policies relating to workplace aggression, diversity, sexual harassment, equal opportunity, etc. The core areas for the policy document needs to be identified. The main policy document needs to be supported by additional policies to ensure proper coverage and implementation. Benchmark the policy document with other organizations’ policy documents. Incorporate the legal requirements for the policy document.
  3. Approval of draft policy document: After completion of the policy document and supplementary policies the same should be approved by the senior management. The draft policy document needs to be formally approved by the top management, audit committee, and board of directors. Obtain feedback from business users to determine if they are going to face any practical difficulties in implementing it.
  4. Develop an implementation strategy: An implementation strategy is critical for the success of the program. A project plan should be developed along with the implementation strategy. The involvement of the Human Resources department is a must at this stage as they will be responsible for deploying training, incorporating the code of conduct in the appointment letters, establishing the reward system for maintaining ethics, and also the reasons for terminating employees on grounds of unethical behavior. The implementation process will require:
    • Department structure and staff requirements of the Ethics office.
    • Selection of vendors for hotline and web systems implementation in case it is not being done in-house.
    • Reward and recognition system to be established by HR.
    • Ethical values should ideally be incorporated in the balanced scorecard of the employee.
    • Training deployment strategy including the trainers, schedules, material, and evaluation system.
    • Investigation and reporting procedures for minor and major deviances
  5. Training & Awareness: Communication is the key to a successful implementation of the Code of Conduct. Various methods and sources of training should be deployed simultaneously to train the staff and external stakeholders. A training calendar should be published for rolling out the training. Explore the following ideas for building awareness and training resources:
    • Prepare classroom training material for educating the staff on the detailed policies.
    • Develop a web-based training program that includes ethical tests, case studies, and business scenarios.
    • Publish relevant cases of ethical dilemmas on the intranet
    • Provide training to existing staff and incorporate the same in induction training for the new staff.
    • Publish the relevant policies on the web for external stakeholders like suppliers, etc.
    • Issue checklists for determining how to make decisions while facing ethical dilemmas.
  6. Implementing the required hotlines and software to monitor complaints: The organization has an option to develop a web-based reporting tool internally or outsource it. Whichever the case may be, the final contact details and services should be published throughout the organization to enable staff to report complaints and discuss cases when they are facing ethical dilemmas. Undertake the following two steps for it:
    • Publish the contact numbers, email ids and websites for reporting complaints
    • Staff these 24/7 for effective monitoring or as per business requirement
  7. Reporting deviances and taking corrective action: Minor and major breaches to the Code of Conduct should be investigated properly. The report should identify the people responsible for the breach, the level of it, corrective action to be taken, and modifications required to the existing policies if any. Do the following: Conduct investigations of the cases reported and submit reports to the audit committee and board of directors. Perform root cause analysis to determine the reason for deviances, and identify solutions to mitigate the risks.
  8. Evaluating commitment to ethical values: Depending on the requirements, periodically, surveys and audits should be conducted to evaluate the adherence to the policies and the overall attitude of the organization towards ethics. One must be aware that having a Code of Conduct does not ensure that it will be followed, hence regular monitoring is required to assess adherence. Adopt the following practices:
    • Conduct an Organization Survey to evaluate employee understanding and commitment to the Code of Business Ethics.
    • Periodically audit the practices being followed by benchmarking them against the policy document.
  9. Annual update: Policies are dynamic documents subject to revisions on the basis of changing economic and legal requirements. Do an overall assessment of the existing policies on annual basis, and incorporate changes after senior management approval. Also, for all additions and modifications, send a formal communication to the staff. Use the following process:
    • Conduct an annual review of the policies.
    • Address gaps and deficiencies identified in the policies
    • Obtain management approval for the same
    • Roll out the updated policies and provide training to the staff.

The advantage of implementing a Code of Conduct is that it enhances the corporate governance efforts of the organization by establishing a uniform set of core values and behavior for all the staff. The staff knows what is the right course of action, whom to approach in a dilemma, and what will be the risks of adopting unethical behavior patterns. Due to this, the reputation and legal risks of the organization are also reduced since it is mandatory for employees to follow the law.

Example of Employee Code of conduct

In order to establish a harmonious and stable corporate environment for the sustainable development of the Company (as defined below) and realize the Company’s vision of “world-leading broadband communication and information service provider”, employees of the Company must adhere to the ethics and code of conduct in respect to their honesty, credibility, and sense of responsibility, and endeavor to maximize the interest of customers, shareholders, employees, and the society. All of the above serve as the basis of this Employee Code of conduct (the “Code of Conduct”).

1 General Provisions

1.1. Scope of Application
1.1.1. This Code of conduct is necessary to maintain the objectiveness and coordination of internal activities of the Company and important for the Company to convey its corporate spirit, quality of service, and corporate value to its customers, employees, shareholders, and society, and must be complied with by all the employees (the “Employees”) of [COMPANY NAME] and its branch companies and subsidiaries (the “Company”);
1.1.2. For Employees governed by the Code of Conduct for Management Personnel, the provisions of the Code of conduct for Management Personnel shall apply. For provisions not included in the Code of conduct for Management Personnel but included in this Code of Conduct, such provisions of this Code of Conduct shall apply;
1.1.3. Service agreements entered into between the Company and any staffing service providers shall expressly specify that staff seconded the Company shall comply with this Code of Conduct.
1.2. Performance of Duties
1.2.1. Employees of the Company should report any fraudulent behavior or behavior that violates this Code of conduct to the Supervision Department of the Company in accordance with the related reporting and processing policies and procedures;
1.2.2. The Company will provide appropriate channels, such as posting this Code of Conduct on the Company’s website, producing it prior to any business activity, or incorporating it into commercial contracts, to ensure that parties that have business relations with the Company, such as suppliers, customers, agents, investors, creditors, and debtors, are able to understand the principles and spirit of this Code of Conduct in an accurate and timely manner.

2 Honesty and Credibility

2.1. Honesty and credibility are the fundamental principles of moral characters of the Company and all Employees. All Employees shall strive to maintain honesty and credibility in their work. Employees shall be honest and credible to customers, fellow tradesmen, partners, colleagues, shareholders, the country, and society.
2.2. Due fulfillment of responsibilities is an important approach for Employees to realize the principles of honesty and credibility. Employees should be responsible and self-disciplined, adhere to principles, be loyal to their duties, serve customers with enthusiasm and efficiency, handle the duties of their positions with a sense of responsibility, safeguard the interest of the Company as well as the rights and benefits of the shareholders and should not be concerned only about their own reputation or financial gains.
2.3. Employees should develop honesty and credibility as part of their fundamental professional ethics and reflect the same in their work, faithfully carrying out their commitments. Honesty and credibility should be fundamental to the Company’s development and success and instrumental to the realization of the Company’s core values.
2.4. Employees should view their performance reports appropriately and truthfully report their performance and keep accurate billing records, in order to ensure the truthfulness and reliability of accounting information and book records, the completeness of financial reporting procedures, and the accuracy of the information submitted. False accounts, figures, or performance results are strictly prohibited.
2.5. Employees are prohibited from providing any false or misleading information within and without the Company. The information disclosure procedures shall be strictly followed.
2.6. Employees should strengthen the prevention of fraudulent behavior, in order to timely report and effectively prevent any fraudulent behavior. The Company encourages honesty and credibility as one aspect of the corporate culture by advocating and protecting Employee whistleblowing actions that truthfully expose fraudulent behaviors or behaviors that violate laws and regulations.
2.7. Employees have the obligation to comply with the current policies, laws, regulations, and other regulatory requirements of India and of the place of the Company’s listing, registration, and business operation, and perform their duties according to the current rules as well as the Articles of Association of the Company.

3 Conflict of Interest

3.1. “Conflict of interest” in this Code of Conduct shall mean any conflict that has occurred or may occur between the personal interest of Employees and the interest of the Company, or between the Employees’ personal interest and their duties. In case of a conflict of interest, Employees should promptly report to their supervisors or the Supervision Department of the Company and proceed pursuant to the responses received in a timely manner.
3.2. Employees should abide by the Articles of Association and various rules and codes of the Company, faithfully perform their duties, and consciously prevent any conflict of interest for the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
3.3. Employees should strictly comply with the laws, regulations and regulatory requirements in respect of anti-commercial bribery, distinguish normal commercial activities from improper business behaviors, firmly rectify any improper business behavior that violates commercial morality and fair competition, and cooperate with the regulatory authorities in their investigation of any commercial bribery cases.
3.4. Employees are prohibited from illegally or inappropriately utilizing their positions or the inherent power thereof, information related to the Company’s operations or financial condition, or any information that may have a material effect on the market price of the Company’s securities for their or their families’ benefits. These activities include direct trading of securities, leaking information to others, and suggesting others for such trading.
3.5. Employees are prohibited from carrying out, causing others to carry out, or invest in any business activities that may compete with the Company’s businesses or business activities that have a conflict of interest with the Company, or with their positions.
3.6. Employees are prohibited from conducting any connected transactions that may be detrimental to the Company’s interests with any economic entities in which they or their relatives serve or hold any investment or other forms of interest in. Employees are prohibited from holding any consulting, advisory, or direct or indirect employment relationship with any customer, supplier, or competitor of the Company or hold any substantial investment interest therein.
3.7. Employees should strictly abide by the related rules and policies of the Company in respect of “excuse from the position” and “excuse from the business”.

4 Relationship with Related Parties

4.1. “Relationship with related parties” in this Code of Conduct shall mean the relationship between Employees and related parties such as customers, business partners, competitors, regulators, and other employees.
4.2. Employees should treat customers, business partners, competitors, regulators, and other employees fairly.
4.3. Employees should adhere to the “Customers First” service concept and give customer service top priority.
4.3.1. Employees should develop the market-oriented service concept and focus on providing excellent services to customers;
4.3.2. Employees should protect the customers’ confidentiality and freedom of communication and should not disclose customers’ information and confidential data without customers’ consent;
4.3.3. In marketing activities, Employees should truthfully inform customers of the Company’s services and products and fully respect customers’ freedom in making purchase decisions;
4.3.4. All Employees should respect customers’ rights and benefits and protect the legitimate interests of the Company.
4.4. When working with business partners, employees of the Company should be consistent in their words and actions.
4.4.1. In selecting production chain partners, Employees of the Company should treat all candidates fairly and objectively and reasonably select the ultimate partner through tendering and bidding and other fair means in accordance with the Company’s rules;
4.4.2. When working with business partners, all Employees of the Company should consciously safeguard the legitimate interests of the Company, strictly abide by the laws and regulations prohibiting unfair competition, monopoly, corruption, and bribery, strictly implement Company’s policies and procedures in commercial contracting and avoid unnecessary commercial risks;
4.4.3. Employees should have respect for the Company’s business partners and should not infringe upon the legitimate interests of the business partners in order to achieve mutually beneficial results for the Company and its partners.
4.5. Employees should strive to maintain a normal market competition environment and a good development environment for the Company.
4.5.1. Employees should follow society’s moral standards and the rules of the competition and are prohibited from taking inappropriate measures to interfere and interrupt network interconnection;
4.5.2. Employees should try to expand the Company’s market share by capitalizing on the Company’s advantages in services, products, and brands and are prohibited from using inappropriate means such as exaggeration or distortion of facts and defaming our competitors’ product quality, service quality, financial condition, or business reputation;

4.5.3. Employees are prohibited from using any illegal or inappropriate means to obtain any commercial secrets or other confidential information of the Company’s competitors in relation to their products, services, or marketing strategies;
4.6. All Employees of the Company should submit to the lawful supervision of the regulatory authorities, communicate as appropriate and assist in maintaining the regulation and order of the industrial market.
4.6.1. Employees should submit to the lawful supervision of the state and capital markets regulatory authorities and safeguard the legitimate interests of the Company;
4.6.2. Employees should have normal interactions with regulatory authorities and are prohibited from any inappropriate trading activities;
4.6.3. Relevant personnel should provide truthful and reliable information required by the regulatory authorities. For any omission or error, Employees should communicate with the regulatory authorities promptly and rectify such omission or error in accordance with the relevant procedures.
4.7. Employees of the Company should treat each other with trust and as equals and work as a team.
4.7.1. Employees should be warm and kind to colleagues, respect each person’s dignity, privacy, and religious beliefs;
4.7.2. Employees should work as a team and use their expertise to promote innovation and teamwork.

5 Information Disclosure and Confidentiality

5.1. Employees should strictly abide by the Company’s confidentiality rules and undertake to safeguard the Company’s commercial secrets and customers’ confidential information during the stipulated confidentiality period.
5.2. The State’s communications secrets, the Company’s commercial secrets and customer confidential information shall mean the proprietary or confidential information that has not been made public and, once made public, will be detrimental to the interests of the State, the Company and the customer, respectively, including, but not limited to, the State’s communications secrets, the Company’s operation information, strategic plans, customer data, remuneration information, marketing, and sales strategies or any other confidential information.
5.3. Employees should safely keep confidential documents, materials, and their storage media appropriately.
5.4. Employees must enter into confidentiality agreements with relevant parties when representing the Company in cooperative or business activities if disclosure of confidential information is involved.

5.5. Employees should not exchange any confidential information pertaining to the Company with any individuals, companies, or institutions or use them without authorization or entering into a confidential agreement, whether or not they are employed at the time by the Company or have benefited from such exchange or use.
5.6. Employees should strictly follow the Company’s information disclosure procedures and are prohibited from, without the Company’s permission, disclosing any confidential information of the Company to the public in their own names or in the name of the Company or make public statements relating to the Company. They are further prohibited from dispersing any false information.

6 Protecting Company Assets

6.1. Company Assets shall mean various tangible or intangible assets, trade secrets, or other professional information that the Company owns or has the right to dispose of, including favorable business opportunities.
6.2. Employees should make reasonable use of and protect Company Assets, and ensure that Company Assets are reasonably utilized to serve lawful commercial purposes. Employees are prohibited from damaging, wasting, encroaching on, embezzling, or abusing Company Assets in any way. Employees should always economize.
6.3. Employees should be risk-conscious, follow the Company’s cost control and management policies strictly and with discipline, and minimize operational risks. Management at each level and all Employees should actively minimize the potential operational risks and strengthen the monitoring and control of operational risks.
6.4. Employees should comply with safety rules and prevent accidents in order to minimize the Company’s asset loss and the Employees’ personal damages.

7 Reporting and Sanction

7.1. Any Employee who has violated this Code of Ethics is subject to Company sanctions, which include, but are not limited to, administrative sanction, termination of the labor contract, and transfer to the judicial branch.
7.2. Every employee is obligated to timely report to supervisory departments any behavior that violates this Code of Ethics pursuant to relevant rules on reporting and handling of the Company. The audit committee of the Board of Directors, Supervision Department, Audit Department, and other departments of the Company are responsible for the supervision and handling of any violation of the Company’s rules and policies. Employees can report via any of the following means:
Mail: [Company mail address ]
Internet:[xx@yy.com]
Telephone and fax: [company phone no].
7.3. The Company encourages employees to report any violation of laws, policies, or regulations. The Company welcomes Employees’ comments and suggestions on operations and management of the Company through various communication channels including “Meet with the President” Day. Management at each level should treat employee comments seriously. Policies on reporting and handling should clearly specify that the Company should provide appropriate protection to whistleblowers and maintain information and records of such whistleblowing confidential. The Company should ensure the independence of personnel receiving and processing information provided by whistleblowers, differentiate authorization levels for relevant personnel, and the de-classification authorization of archives. Personnel responsible for receiving, recording, and processing or having access to reported information should sign additional confidential agreements specifying their obligations with regard to confidentiality. The Company should also reinforce the security measures for mailboxes, hotlines, and email boxes for whistleblowing, distinguish responsibilities between the management of reported information and report investigation and strictly follow the procedures for use of information and archives.
7.4. The Company protects employees reporting violations of laws, policies, or regulations. Reporting via telephone or mail can be anonymous. Employees who leak information or retaliate against whistleblowers shall be subject to removal from position or termination of employment. Employees that violate the laws will be handed over to the prosecution.

8 Supplementary Clauses

8.1. This Code of Conduct is a regulatory document setting forth professional standards for employees of the Company. As an attachment to the labor contract, it has the same legally binding force and effect as the labor contract. Employees should also comply with the State’s laws, regulations, and administrative rules, the Articles of Associations of the Company, and various current rules and regulations within the Company.
8.2. When employees sign their labor contracts, they should also sign Employee Statement I (See Exhibit I), indicating that they know and will comply with the various provisions of this Code of Ethics and monitor and report any behavior in violation of this Code of Ethics.
8.3. Human Resource departments at each level should publicize and implement this Code of Ethics by various means, including training. They should also conduct training via mail or office system and have Employees sign Employee Statement II (see Exhibit II) annually, collect information on fraudulent behaviors and behaviors that violate this Code of Ethics and submit to supervisory organizations for investigation and decision.

8.4. This Code of Ethics is reviewed by the Legal Department of the Company and by the Employees’ Congress. It shall take effect upon approval by the Board of Directors of the Company, which also has the interpreting authority. Termination or any modification of this Code of Ethics should be approved by the Board of Directors.

Exhibit I:  Employees Statement I

I have carefully read and understood the requirements of this Employee Code of Conduct (the “Code”) of [Company name]. I acknowledge that it is an exhibit to my labor contract with equal legal binding force and effect and undertake to abide by this Code. I hereby declare the following:
1. I will abide by professional ethics and not commit fraudulent acts or behaviors in violation of this Code;
2. I will timely report any fraudulent behavior or behaviors in violation of this Code.

(Signature)

Date:

Exhibit II: Employees Statement II

1. I have strictly complied with the Employees Code of Conduct of [Company name] (the “Code”) from _________,  to _________, and have not committed any acts in violation of this Code;
2. I am not aware of any acts committed by other employees that are fraudulent or in violation of this Code. I have truthfully reported all such acts that I’m aware of to the Supervision Department.

(Signature)

Date:

—————————End of example—————————————

Example of Whistleblowing  Policy of Oman LNG L.C.C

1. Introduction
Oman LNG is committed to the highest possible standards in terms of governance practices, openness/transparency, honesty, accountability, professionalism, and duty of care in delivering one’s responsibilities as prescribed in OLNG’s “Statement of General Business Principles” and “Code of Conduct”.

2. Purpose
This Policy aims to encourage every individual working for or dealing with the Company to report any Unethical Practices at any level of the organizational structure with complete comfort, confidence, and protection. Also, it aims to define and establish the position of the Company on the framework for reporting Unethical Practices and establish suitable steps to investigate and take necessary corrective actions.

3. Definition
a. “Unethical Practice” means any behavior or practice of the Company, its employees, contractors, suppliers, or their individual employees in relation to their business dealings with the Company which is believed to be inconsistent with the Company’s General Business Principles and its general spirit, and includes, but is not limited to, the following suspected activities / improper practices:

  • Fraud or fraudulent financial reporting;
  • Manipulation of Company data/records, including forging official documents;
  • Abuse of authority at any defined level in the Company;
  •  Disclosure of confidential/proprietary information to unauthorized personnel;
  •  Knowingly violating applicable laws and regulations, thereby exposing the Company to penalties, fines, or any legal action;
  • Any instances of misappropriation or abuse of Company property/assets;
  • Actively violating any laid down Company policy, including the Code of Conduct;
  • The economically wasteful act or action;
  •  Criminal activity;
  •  Harassment of any nature to employees or any other third party.
  •  Using confidential information acquired in the course of one’s work for personal advantage;
  •  Any other activities whether unethical or improper in nature and damaging the interests of the Company;
  •  Attempts to conceal any of the above.

b. “Whistleblower” means any person (employee, director, customer, vendor, or any other individual stakeholder) reporting an Unethical Practice under this policy.

4.  Reporting Unethical Practice

a. The Company has introduced this policy to enable you to raise your concerns about Unethical Practices at an early stage and in the right way. If something is troubling you which you think the Company’s management or Board should know about or look into, then please refer to this policy.

b. Normally, concerns should be raised with the appropriate department that the issue is dealt with within the Company and should be handled in line with company policies and procedures. It is recognized, however, that there may be occasions where the use of the normal chain of command may not be appropriate. Persons may believe their concerns:

  • are overly sensitive;
  • would  not be receiving appropriate attention;
  • are of particular significance;
  • the line manager/department is the perpetrator of the issue to be addressed or
  • the person may be sufficiently uncomfortable such that it warrants the use of another confidential reporting channel. 

Hence, the Whistleblower may report such Unethical Practice in writing to WhistleBlow@omanlng.co.om. This mailbox is regularly reviewed by the Chief Internal Auditor at the Company. 

c. The Chief Internal Auditor shall never reveal the name of the Whistleblower without his/her consent unless required by law. If they at some point in time are ordered and required by law to report the name of the Whistleblower, they shall inform the Whistleblower, unless they have lawful reasons not to do so.  Where the Whistleblower feels very exposed and is afraid of being victimized (s)he can e-mail anonymously when reporting the issue by hiding his / her identity. In this respect, the Whistleblower shall provide and deliver all related information and facts with the initial report to facilitate the investigation process. The Whistleblower can remain anonymous in follow-up communications and clarifications by providing a discreet e-mail address.

d. The Whistleblower must address the following aspects, while reporting any issues under this policy:

  • A clear understanding of the issue being raised.
  • The issue should not be merely speculative in nature but should be based on actual facts.
  • Should contain as much specific information as possible to allow proper inquiry/ investigation.
  • If the Whistleblower has a personal interest in the matter, (s)he will be required to disclose this.

5. Protection to Whistleblower

The identity of the Whistleblower shall be kept confidential at all times unless otherwise agreed with the Whistleblower or required by law (e.g. during the course of any legal proceedings, where the Whistleblower is required to give evidence in court). No unfair treatment shall be vetted out towards any Whistleblower acting in good faith by virtue of his/her having reported issues under this policy and the Company shall ensure that full protection is granted to him/her against any action.

—————————End of example————————————— 

IATF 16949:2016 Clause 4.3.1 Determining the Scope of the Quality Management System and Clause 4.3.2 Customer specific requirements

The scope of  QMS must do two things :1. Meet requirements consistently and 2. Enhance customer satisfaction by the effective application of  QMS,    continual improvement of  QMS, and providing assurance of conformity to customer and applicable regulatory requirements. Your organization must have the capability to determine your customer needs and requirements; design and develop a product; know-how and capacity to manufacture a product; package product; deliver on time; provide service and support; etc. It must have the ability to repeat your capability within specified parameters for quality as defined by customers, your own organization, or regulatory bodies. To achieve and demonstrate your capabilities, you must effectively plan, operate and control the processes, within your organization that provides them. These processes collectively form the scope of your quality management system (QMS).  The effective application of your QMS can be determined by – how well QMS activities and results measure up to planned performance indicators. Continual improvement of the QMS is achieved by – increasing the ability of the QMS to meet requirements through raising the performance indicators and more efficient use of resources.   Assurance of conformity to requirements may be achieved by providing confidence that requirements will be fulfilled. This confidence may be achieved through – implementing prevention-based controls; conducting internal/external audits; 3rd party certification of your QMS; etc.   This standard provides specific requirements to effectively plan, operate, control, and improve your QMS processes. These requirements focus on prevention-based controls and to a lesser extent detection-based controls, as well as continual improvement of your QMS.   It is important to note that the does not specify requirements for the product. The focus is on your QMS and its processes. By effectively controlling and continually improving your QMS processes, there will obviously be a positive impact on product quality performance. look at regulatory requirements applicable to your organization. These requirements may come from your customer; the industry you are in; from within your own organization; or state or federal organizations. You may need to apply regulatory requirements to your suppliers and outsourced processes (subcontractors). Your ultimate objective is to enhance customer satisfaction. You achieve this by planning, operating, and improving your QMS to effectively meet customer and regulatory requirements. As this standard represents specific automotive OEMs, your QMS must provide objective evidence that your QMS processes can identify and manage these requirements and that customer-specific requirements are effectively implemented.

Scope refers to the type of automotive supply chain facilities, IATF 16949 is applicable to. “Automotive” includes cars, trucks (light, medium, and heavy), buses, motorcycles. It excludes industrial, agricultural, off-highway (mining, forestry, construction, etc.). It includes all supplier ‘sites’  providing value-added parts, components, products, sub-assemblies, and services up the supply chain to the OEM. TS 16949 requirements may be applied to any site in the supply chain by its customer. It applies to all supply chain facilities or ‘sites’ that manufacture production materials; production and service parts; assemblies; or provide (value-added) finishing services such as heat treating, welding, painting; etc., for the automotive OEM’s subscribing to this standard. This means that all Tier 1 suppliers providing such products or services directly to subscribing automotive OEMs, must get IATF 16949 certification and they in turn may flow IATF 16949 conformity or certification requirements down to Tier 2 suppliers and so on. The flow down to tier 2 or 3 has now become more the norm than the exception. The ultimate aim is that all suppliers must be certified to IATF 16949 standard. This standard cannot be applied to:

  • Automotive after-market service parts made to original subscribing OEM specifications, but not procured and released through them.
  • Manufacturers of tooling; production equipment; jigs; fixtures; molds; etc used by the auto industry.
  • Remanufactured automobile parts.
  • Distribution centers; warehouses; parts packagers; logistics support; and sequencers.

Determine whether your activities or location is a site or support function. Note that the definition of ‘site is a location where value-added manufacturing occurs and a support function is a value-adding non-manufacturing process that supports a site. The support function may be on-site or at a remote location.   The rules for third-party Certification Body (Registrar) auditing of sites and remote locations are specified in an IATF document called “Automotive Certification Scheme for IATF 16949:2016 – Rules for achieving IATF recognition”. The general rule is that sites may obtain stand-alone IATF 16949 certification, but support functions, cannot obtain stand-alone certification.    Support functions may include a variety of non-manufacturing activities such as – design; purchasing; HR; sales; distribution centers; warehousing; sequencing; logistics; etc.     All support functions (whether on-site or off-site) that support a site must be included in that site’s QMS scope. As such they must be audited to all applicable IATF 16949 requirements including their interaction with site activities. Both manufacturing, as well as support activities, maybe outsourced (i.e. performed by an independently owned organization, on your site, or off-site). Organizations performing outsourced manufacturing activity must be subject to the same TS 16949 requirements that would apply if the activity were done by your organization. Such organizations can obtain independent IATF 16949 certification if required by their customers.  Organizations performing outsourced support functions (e.g. warehousing or HR services) may be subject to specific IATF 16949 requirements imposed by their customers, however, they cannot obtain independent IATF 16949 certification for such support activities. They may obtain independent ISO 9001 certification. The organizations subscribing to the TS 16949 standard include General Motors; Ford; Daimler Chrysler; Fiat; PSA Peugeot-Citreon; Renault SA; FIEV: Opel Vauxhall; Audi; BMW; VW; Mercedes Benz; etc. The Japanese OEM’s while participating in the development of the IATF 16949 standard, do not formally subscribe to it or require it of their supply chain.

ISO 9001:2015 4.3 Determining the Scope of the Quality Management System

For explanation on ISO 9001:2015 4.3.Determining the scope of the Quality Management System click here. 

IATF 16949:2016 4.3.1 Determining the Scope of the Quality Management System- Supplement

All Supporting functions, whether they’re done in the same place as the main work or from somewhere else (like design offices, main offices, and distribution centers) should be part of the Scope of the Quality Management system(QMS) . The only time you’re allowed to not include them in the scope is when it is related to the product design and development requirements , as described in ISO 9001, Section 8.3. If you choose to leave these parts out, you need to have a good reason and write it down. But you can’t leave out the manufacturing process design.

Explanation:

In order to establish a QMS (Quality Management System) according to IATF 16949, you first need to define everything the QMS will apply to. This requirement is nothing new to quality standards, or any other management system standard, for that matter. Although it seems like just a formality, defining the scope is one of the crucial steps in the implementation and ongoing maintenance of the QMS. You will basically define to what processes, locations, products, and services your QMS applies, and this will provide input for the certification body and auditors. Requirements for the scope in IATF 16949 are based mostly on ISO 9001, but as with many other requirements, the automotive industry goes a bit further. Since ISO 9001 requirements are the first we need to meet in the implementation and are not stated in the text of the IATF 16949 standard, let’s examine them first.

Section 4.3 of the ISO 9001:2015 standard details the requirements for determining the scope of the Quality Management System. In a note about the QMS, it is stated that the QMS can include the whole organization, specifically identified functions of the organization, specifically identified sections of the organization, or one or more functions across a group of organizations. To start, there are three considerations to be included when determining the scope:

  • external and internal issues that are relevant to the purpose of the organization, the strategic direction, and the ability to achieve intended results
  • requirements of relevant interested parties
  • the product and service of the organization

In addition, the scope must state the products and services covered by the QMS, and justification for any instances where the ISO 9001 standard cannot be applied—but this requirement is further limited by IATF 16949, as you will see below. Although ISO 9001 allows organizations to decide which functions or sections will be included in the scope, IATF 16949 requires supporting functions, whether on-site or remote, to be included in the scope of the QMS. Supporting functions can be design centers, corporate headquarters, and distribution centers. This leaves far less freedom for the organization when defining the scope, and the aim is to ensure that all operations that affect the quality of products and services and/or customer satisfaction are included in the QMS scope. This will make the implementation much harder for some organizations, especially for big companies that have many locations on several continents. Customer-specific requirements also need to be evaluated and included in the scope of the QMS. In practice, this means that the organization will have to consider these requirements, and see how they reflect on the QMS, and act accordingly. For some organizations, this won’t bring anything new; however, for companies where their customers define processes, products, or services it means that they will have to include all of this in the scope of the QMS. Furthermore, the standard in this section defines the exclusions. IATF 16949 allows exclusions only from clause 8.3, and even here, with many limitations. Basically, the only requirements that can be excluded are related to the design and development of products and services. Permitted exclusions do not include manufacturing process design. Naturally, the organization will also have to provide and document justifications for exclusions. Finally, there is a requirement to document the scope; unlike ISO 9001, which doesn’t specify where and how IATF 16949 requires the Quality Manual to include the information about the scope and justifications for any exclusions.

Usually, the scope of the QMS covers the entire organization. Some noted exceptions are when your QMS only covers one physical location of a multi-location company, or when your manufacturing or service is distinctly split between industries (e.g., in a plant with three assembly lines where assembly lines 1 and 2 are for automotive and need to have a QMS certified to the ISO/TS 16949 QMS standard for automotive, but you want line 3 to be certified to ISO 9001 because many of the automotive requirements do not apply). So, your scope should identify the physical locations of the QMS, products or services that are created within the QMS processes, and the industries that are applicable, if this is relevant. It should be clear enough to identify what your business does, and if not all parts of the business are applicable, it should be identified clearly which parts are.

Your scope does not have a size limit and should include enough information to determine what is covered by the processes of the QMS. However, it is important to make clear what is included and what is not. If it is not clear to you what processes in your company are covered by your QMS, then how will it be clear to an outside auditor or other interested parties? Making your scope statement simple and easy to read can help to focus your QMS efforts, and prevent unnecessary questions about activities that may not be applicable to your QMS certification. The definition of a management system in ISO 9000:2015 for the first time provides an option to scope the system down to a single function or discipline. This was never the intent of a QMS, which was always intended to apply to an entire organization. ISO 9001:2015 also eliminated the term “permissible exclusions” by saying that if a requirement can be applied, it must be applied. Minimalists can now argue they only must include one function in their systems and incorporate only those requirements that apply to that function. IATF 16949:2016 addresses this problem in sub-clause 4.3.1, which requires support processes and value-adding sites to be included in a QMS’s scope. The previous 2008 version of ISO 9001 never mentioned omitting applicable requirements due to the geographic location of the processes. In IATF 16949:2016, where you choose to locate activities is your organization’s prerogative, but all applicable processes and requirements must be in the QMS regardless of where an organization chooses to locate and perform them. Individuals, such as auditors, who must verify whether an organization is conforming to applicable requirements must visit the locations in which those processes are being performed to verify conformance. The new ISO 9000:2015 definition of “management system” now allows for a QMS scope to be as narrow as one function. Furthermore, top management is aligned to the scope of the QMS. If a minimalist organization chose to include only the purchasing department in its scope, top management would be the purchasing executive. There is another argument that can be used by minimalist ISO 9001 implementers. A clause in IATF 16949:2016 indicates that if an ISO 9001 requirement can be applied, it must be, and product quality cannot be compromised.

For an example on how a scope could be derived please click here

Clause 4.3.2 Customer Specific requirements

“The organization should look at what each customer wants as part of its customer-specific requirements and include those things in scope of its QMS.”

Explanation:

Customer specific requirements (CSRs) as defined by IATF 16949 is “interpretations of or supplemental requirements linked to a specific clause(s) of this Automotive QMS standards

Customer-specific requirements are the requirements created by the customer with the expectation that the supplier will identify, implement, and audit these customer-specific requirements with the same intensity that they do the basic requirements of the standard. Customer-specific requirements are requirements that are outside the TS document. Had all the subscribers to the document being able to agree on these unique, very specific, company-specific requirements, then those requirements would have been written as part of the text inside TS. It is important that the audit team receiving details of customer-specific requirements well in advance of any audit (initial, surveillance, or renewal) from the organization, using them as a basis for the audit planning process. Failure to do so is viewed as an audit failure. Customer-specific requirements are those that are agreed to between the supplier and the customer. They typically fall into the following categories:

  • Part-specific requirements (dimensions, materials, performance characteristics, etc.)
  • Delivery requirements
  • Boiler-plate requirements (typically found in the purchase order)
  • General requirements (PPAP, APQP, etc.)
  • Process requirements (example: heat treat)
1

The terms customer-specific requirements and supplier quality manuals are in many ways interchangeable. Some customers refer to their documents directly as ‘Customer Specific Requirements’ while others call their documents ‘Supplier Manuals’ or ‘Supplier Quality Manuals’. The distinction, in part, is that ‘Supplier Manuals’ or ‘Supplier Quality Manuals’ often contain customer-specific requirements, as well as policies, terms, and conditions unrelated to quality. Customer-specific requirements, in their truest form, seek to expand the standard, or define how a customer wants a portion of the standard to be met. Customer-specific requirements are a component of lATF 16949 that cannot be ignored. ln fact, customer-specific requirements are more important in lATF 16949 than they were in QS-9000, which considered them as part of the requirements. Furthermore. the customer-specific requirements of Daimler Chrysler, Ford. and GM was the only essential “requirements” in implementing and auditing QS-9000. IATF I6949 changes this situation. The International Automotive Task Force (IATF), which consists of nine OEMs which include the following vehicle manufacturers: BMW Group, FCA US LLC, Daimler AG, FCA Italy Spa, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company, PSA Group, Renault, Volkswagen AG and the vehicle manufacturers respective trade associations – AIAG (U.S.), ANFIA (Italy), FIEV (France), SMMT (U.K.) and VDA QMC (Germany) used a different strategy to create IATF 16949. When all of the IATF members could not agree on a certain clause or process, the objecting OEM put that particular clause into its own customer-specific requirements. Consequently, there are many more customer core requirements. The five Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) reference manuals, which were understood to be core requirements of QS-9000. are now customer-specific requirements of DaimlerChrysler. Ford. and GM.

The figure above shows that ISO 9001 is considered a base set of requirements that IATF 16949 builds upon for the automotive sector. IATF I6949 tells the supplier to conform to the company- (i.e.customer specific requirements in addition to IATF l6949’s requirements. Additional requirements may include division-specific requirements, commodity-specific requirements. or part-specific requirements. Examples of division-specific requirements include a semiconductor commodity supplier to a Daimler Chrysler plant. or a heat treat supplier to a Ford Powertrain division. The semiconductor supplier has to contend with the following requirements:
ISO 9001,  IATF 16949,  five reference manuals. which are part of DaimlerChrysler’s requirements: semiconductor commodity-specific requirements issued by the Automotive Electronics Council: and part-specific requirements from a contract review. Similarly, the heat treat supplier to Ford Powertrain has to implement ISO 9001, IATF 16949. five reference manuals. heat treat requirements specific to Ford. a DCP control plan methodology specific to the Ford Powertrain division. and part-specific requirements of that particular heat-treated part. derived from contract review. Needless to say. the customer-specific requirements have gained a whole new degree of importance in IATF In fact. customer-specific requirements will be It challenge when implementing and/or auditing IATF I6949.

Documentation Requirements For Customer-Specific  Requirements

Customer-specific documentation requirements are stated in the customer-specific documents of DaimlerChrysler. Ford, and GM. The Daimler Chrysler requirement says. “All IATF 16949 requirements and the requirements of this document (i.e.. customer-specific requirements) shall be documented in the organization’s quality system.” The Ford and GM customer-specific documents say. “All IATF 16949:2016 requirements and the requirements of this document shall be addressed by the organization’s quality system.” The DaimlerChrysler requirement asks the organization to trace each “shall“ to ensure that it has been included in the documented system. The Ford and GM requirements ask the organization and the auditor to ensure that each “shall” has been addressed by the organization’s business/quality system. Daimler Chrysler’s documentation requirements are more precise and place a greater documentation burden on the organization. Organizations should map the customer-specific requirements into their process documentation or work instructions. Through this method. both current and future employees can become knowledgeable of customer-specific requirements as they work within a process. If your organization does not use this strategy. it will have difficulty separating out customer-specific requirements and addressing the issue of how employees are to ensure process repeatability. For example. clause 8.3.5.2 of the GM customer-specific requirements says. “The organization shall have a method to identify, control, and monitor the high-risk items on those critical operations. There shall be rapid feedback and feed-forward between inspection stations and manufacturing, between departments, and between shifts. ” This is a detail that needs to be built into the process. It is not possible for a management system to address such a requirement without building it into a process. work instruction. form, or checklist.

Implementing customer specific Requirements. 

1

The strategy for addressing customer-specific requirements should be as follows. First. the organization must identify and assemble all of the customer-specific requirements from its customer base.

Customer Specific requirement checklist: for Automotive industry (considered requirements of IATF 16949)

  • It is important that utilization of accredited laboratory facilities should be specified by as per government-approved certifying body.
  • To verify, is customer approved sub-contractor service to be utilized? The approved vendor list index such information.
  • Most important is transportation mode for shipping the materials should be specified, where containers / or and any vehicle type / or and specified as surface transportation.
  • Some analytical and statistical details that possible to demand by the customer which is conducted internally for process and activities, like control plan, PFMEA, PPAP (PPAP is widely recommended and used in the automotive industry, in with some customers are demand as necessary requirements)
  • Some customer is demand detailed information about traceability requirements.
  • The stability of processes: ongoing process capability requirement should be specified; most customers can ask for it.
  • It should be clear with the customer-specific requirements, PPAP submission, and sample size, grade, and specification should be identified and confirmed from customers.
  • Is there a customer-specified method for handing complaints? Specified format for responding like 8D format, most customers are preferring standard formats but some customers are expecting some unique requirements as its application requirements.
  • Specific packing and labeling requirements should be specified. Generally packaging and labeling requirements mostly different for a single product from different customers, so it is very important to specific requirements are collected and approved by customers.

Some other requirements like MSA approval requirements, shipping notification, quality records and reviews, inspection reports, special characters and their symbol identifications, internal quality auditors’ qualifications, non-conformance details, etc. International standards – requirements mostly IATF 16949 requirements are Measurement system Analysis are consider as the primary requirement for the manufacturers of the automotive applications and same for the supplier chain that provided material to OEM & automotive applications assembling, supply chain also needs to update with the same technical specification which is automotive industries are following.

Implementation begins with training. Key supplier personnel must be trained in customer-specific requirements. Customer requirements typically come in two levels of specificity: identifying how a process should operate. or requiring an entirely new process or method. Detailed customer specifics can be implemented into processes by following a documentation strategy. Mapping the customer-specific requirements to processes is the least risky, and so the best. documentation strategy. Adopt a common process for the entire organization and clearly indicate different ways tasks should be performed to satisfy different customers. Organizations should follow these steps when adopting customer-specific requirements:

  1. Adopt the most stringent requirement.
  2. Describe how tasks may be different for different customers.
  3. Add different forms for different customers if the submission methods differ.
  4. Measure processes differently if customer measurement criteria vary.

Some customer criteria cannot be implemented just by mapping them into existing processes. Customer specifics may ask suppliers to adopt a certain system. For example. Daimler Chrysler requires the use of Power way. and Ford requires the use of a particular CAD system. Sometimes, the requirements mandate an entire implementation for e.g., MS-9000 or MMOG (by Ford) or Ford Ql requirements. Teams must be formed for these specific implementations and the mandates must be completed as a part of ISO/T S 16949 implementation.

Auditing Requirements  For Customer-Specific Requirements

Utilizing document review is the best method for determining whether the organization has already considered all of the customer-specific requirements. The internal auditor needs to have a detailed document review checklist with the “shalls” clearly delineated. The organization must complete the checklist, showing where it believes the customer-specific requirements are documented. The auditor will check to see if the processes indeed demonstrate evidence of compliance with the customer-specific requirements. As mentioned previously. some requirements are processes that would only be audited during an onsite audit. Once the auditor has checked each process and ensured that the processes demonstrate evidence of compliance with the customer’s specifics. then the requirements can be discarded and the process documentation used for the on-site audit. Trying to audit customer-specific requirements during an onsite audit without the document review is difficult and time-consuming. To understand the specific requirements matrix, let’s see what can consider requirements that customers can demands? And what kinds of customer demands or requirements are considered as specific. As on base of supplier’s previous experience with customers & routine supplies than extra things are requested by the customer that never asked before those requirements are considered as specific requirements, No it is not completely true, actually customer-specific requirements are considered on the basis of the customer’s requirements those are affecting the customer’s applications & business that concern with the quality of the products, some applications are very critical that required special measurements & Analysis to approve for the assembling, most of automotive customers requirements are almost specific. The reason very states that application of the product and its fitting criteria’s required tolerances of approval is very close that need to the analysis of the product to enhance quality with minor or zero tolerances with comparing customer’s required tolerances, there is no space for huge variation, application requirements variation of product an be very low that critical to maintaining for a supplier, that should need care at all the parameters, instructions and its follow-up strongly.

Customer Specific requirements matrix, base requirement is PPAP ( Part Production Approval Process ), it’s a specific requirement, the reason that customer buy the material for the assembling with a specific design that can possible are done in the assembly area, to match with the design of the customer engineering shop, product’s first part will be going to approval for,. Customer’s engineers are check as design provided to the supplier, match all possibilities to understand the further requirements, changes, or modifications to the finalized product. The customer-specific requirements matrix can be developed when we really fully understand the customer-specific requirements or customer’s end application’s requirements. the product we are manufacturing is installed/used at any particular part or utilize for a specific purpose of course against the customers must ask for unique requirements to match its requirements queries. To understand the customer-specific requirements, needs to verify what the really customer expects?